Skip to the story
All stories

US awards $22.9bn Raytheon contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile production

The seven-year deal aims to increase annual output to over 1,000 units amid reports of depleted stockpiles

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
An analysis by a think tank found that US stocks of Patriot and THAAD air defense missiles have been slashed by the conflict with Iran. File photo: Reuters

What this story says

  • The US Department of Defense awarded Raytheon a $22.9 billion contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile production over seven years.
  • Annual production will rise from 60 to over 1,000 units, addressing reported shortages due to the conflict with Iran.
  • Acting US Navy Secretary Hung Cao said the contract would deliver missiles to warfighters at 'unprecedented speed'.
  • CSIS estimated US stocks of Patriot and THAAD interceptors have been roughly halved since the war with Iran began in February.

Who covered it

Left 14%(4)Centre 38%(11)Right 48%(14)

Percentages are shares of the 29 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 12 of the 41 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

86/100

Craft

87/100

Hype

15/100

41 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 4 of the 29 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The US Department of Defense awarded Raytheon a $22.9 billion contract on 17 August 2026 to accelerate production of Tomahawk cruise missiles. The seven-year agreement aims to increase annual output from about 60 units to more than 1,000. Acting US Navy Secretary Hung Cao said the contract would 'accelerate Tomahawk missile delivery to our warfighters at unprecedented speed'.

The contract follows reports of depleted US missile stockpiles due to the conflict with Iran, which began in late February. The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated that US stocks of Patriot and THAAD air defence interceptors have been roughly halved since the war started. Tomahawk missiles, launched from submarines and warships, have a range of over 1,600 kilometres.

Disagreement on contract value

Some outlets reported the contract value as $23 billion, rounding up from $22.9 billion. vijesti.me and Korrespondent.net used the $23 billion figure, while the majority of reports, including those from rthk.hk and the US Navy, cited $22.9 billion.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mentioned the CSIS estimate that US stocks of Patriot and THAAD interceptors have been roughly halved since the war with Iran began. Only rthk.hk, a left-rated outlet, included this detail in its full report. None of the centre-rated digests carried the CSIS estimate either.

The cost per Tomahawk missile, cited as about $2.6 million by vijesti.me, was not mentioned in any of the left-rated or centre-rated digests. Only one right-rated digest, Korrespondent.net, included the annual production increase from 60 to over 1,000 units.

Guaranteeing our naval and joint forces have the lethal firepower they need to deter aggression and protect the homeland is paramount.

Hung Cao, Acting US Navy Secretary

$22.9bn

Value of Raytheon contract

Seven-year deal to increase Tomahawk missile production

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 17 Aug 2026, 20:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

4 rated outlets

  • The four left-rated digests led on the contract’s connection to depleted missile stockpiles. Business Insider and The Independent noted the US military’s effort to 'replenish shrinking stockpiles' of advanced weapons. rthk.hk, whose full report is printed below, quoted Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao’s statement and included the CSIS estimate that Patriot and THAAD interceptor stocks had been 'slashed' by the conflict with Iran. Al-Monitor’s digest also carried Cao’s quote.
  • rthk.hk’s report described the contract as a response to 'reports of a shortfall due to the war with Iran' and quoted The Washington Post’s account of President Donald Trump demanding answers from Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth about munitions shortages. The outlet used the phrase 'dwindling missile stocks' to describe the situation.

Centre

11 rated outlets

  • The eight centre-rated digests focused on the scale of the contract and its role in rebuilding depleted stockpiles. The Jerusalem Post and Military Times described the deal as a 'landmark' or 'dramatic' boost to Tomahawk production. France24 and Lietuvos Radijas ir Televizija led with the contract’s announcement amid 'reports of a shortfall due to the war with Iran'. Navy Times and Defense News emphasised the US military’s effort to 'rebuild depleted stocks of high-tech weaponry'.
  • Newsweek’s digest quoted Raytheon’s pledge to 'dramatically accelerate' production and described the Tomahawk as the US Navy’s 'most important strike weapon'. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the CSIS estimate of halved Patriot and THAAD interceptor stocks.

Right

14 rated outlets

  • The eight right-rated digests led on the contract’s value and its role in addressing munitions shortages. Latestly and Tribune India described the deal as a response to 'depleted US munitions stockpiles' due to the conflict with Iran. Le Figaro’s digest framed the contract as part of Washington’s effort to 'rebuild and strengthen its military capabilities' after months of war. Al Bawaba’s digest used the phrase 'America’s stockpiles are at risk' and described the contract as the Pentagon ‘opening its war vaults’.
  • La Razón’s digest described the contract as a move to 'strengthen its long-range attack capability', while abc.es framed it as part of the US’s attempts to 'strengthen the US Navy'. Korrespondent.net’s digest was the only right-rated report to mention the increase in annual production, noting the rise from 60 to over 1,000 units. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the CSIS estimate of halved Patriot and THAAD interceptor stocks.

Read it at the source

41 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

4

Centre

11
Show 3 more

Right

14
Show 6 more

Not rated

12
Show 4 more

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover US awards $22.9bn Raytheon contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile…?
Of the 29 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 14% are rated left, 38% are rated centre, 48% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 41. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is US awards $22.9bn Raytheon contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 29 rated outlets on this story, 14% are rated left, 38% are rated centre, 48% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of US awards $22.9bn Raytheon contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile… biased?
US awards $22.9bn Raytheon contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile production is one event reported by 41 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting US awards $22.9bn Raytheon contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered US awards $22.9bn Raytheon contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile…?
41 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How much is the Raytheon contract worth?
The US Department of Defense awarded Raytheon a $22.9 billion contract to accelerate Tomahawk missile production. Some outlets rounded the figure to $23 billion, but the official value is $22.9 billion. The deal spans seven years and aims to increase annual output to over 1,000 units.
Why is the US increasing Tomahawk missile production?
The US is increasing Tomahawk missile production to address depleted stockpiles due to the conflict with Iran, which began in February 2026. The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated that US stocks of Patriot and THAAD interceptors have been roughly halved since the war started.
Which outlets reported the CSIS estimate of halved missile stocks?
Only rthk.hk, a left-rated outlet, included the CSIS estimate that US stocks of Patriot and THAAD interceptors have been roughly halved since the war with Iran began. None of the centre-rated or right-rated digests mentioned this detail.
What did Acting US Navy Secretary Hung Cao say about the contract?
Hung Cao said the contract would 'accelerate Tomahawk missile delivery to our warfighters at unprecedented speed'. He also stated that guaranteeing naval and joint forces have the 'lethal firepower they need to deter aggression and protect the homeland is paramount'.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

How left, centre and right covered the $22.9bn Tomahawk missile deal | MediaBias News