US plans $2.8bn arms package for Israel including 40,000 bombs
The proposed sale includes MK-84 and BLU-117 munitions, which have been linked to civilian casualties.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

US plans $2.8bn arms package for Israel including 40,000 bombs
Photograph: Anadolu Ajansı (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The Trump administration is preparing a $2.8 billion arms package for Israel.
- The package includes 40,000 bombs weighing 2,000 pounds each, including MK-84 and BLU-117 types.
- The Washington Post reported the plan, citing US officials.
- The MK-84 is described as a highly destructive munition, and Israel has used 2,000-pound bombs extensively in Gaza and Lebanon, linked to civilian casualties.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 8 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 4 of the 12 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
60/100
Craft
60/100
Hype
40/100
12 sources · methodology
The Trump administration is preparing a $2.8 billion arms package for Israel, according to reports. The package would include 40,000 bombs weighing 2,000 pounds each. The Washington Post reported the plan, citing US officials. The bombs are identified as MK-84 and BLU-117 types. The MK-84 is described as a highly destructive munition. Israel has used 2,000-pound bombs extensively in Gaza and Lebanon, where their use has been linked to civilian casualties. The proposed package would exceed previous US transfers of 2,000-pound bombs to Israel under both the Biden and Trump administrations.
Disagreement on specific bomb types
While The Washington Post and Anadolu Ajansı reported the package includes 20,000 MK-84 bombs and 20,000 BLU-117 bombs, along with 20,000 I-2000 Penetrator warheads according to Anadolu Ajansı, other reports state the package includes tens of thousands of 2,000-pound bombs without specifying the exact breakdown of types.
Omissions
None of the centre-rated digests mention the specific detail that the proposed package would exceed previous US transfers of 2,000-pound bombs to Israel under both the Biden and Trump administrations, a point made by Anadolu Ajansı and The Washington Post.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 15 Sept 2026, 19:45, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
1 rated outlet
- The Washington Post's report led on the planned sale of controversial bombs to Israel, describing it as the largest in years. The report noted the 2,000-pound munition has been involved in scores of incidents resulting in civilian casualties and stated the sale sets up a potential litmus test for Democrats.
Centre
4 rated outlets
- Reports from the centre-rated outlets focused on the Trump administration's plan to sell Israel a $2.8 billion munitions package, including tens of thousands of highly destructive 2,000-pound bombs. Several reports cited US officials or sources familiar with the sale. Political Wire specifically mentioned the sale as the largest single sale of the controversial munition in recent years.
Right
3 rated outlets
- Right-rated reports highlighted the Trump administration's intention to send a draft deal worth approximately $2.8 billion to Congress for approval. These reports stated the deal includes the sale of 40,000 heavy aerial bombs to Israel, including 2,000-pound MK-84 and BLU-117 bombs. Anadolu Ajansı also provided details on the specific types of bombs and warheads, and noted that the weapons would be purchased with US taxpayer funds.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover US plans $2.8bn arms package for Israel including 40,000 bombs?
- Of the 8 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 13% are rated left, 49% are rated centre, 38% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 12. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is US plans $2.8bn arms package for Israel including 40,000 bombs left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 8 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of US plans $2.8bn arms package for Israel including 40,000 bombs biased?
- US plans $2.8bn arms package for Israel including 40,000 bombs is one event reported by 12 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which outlets covered US plans $2.8bn arms package for Israel including 40,000 bombs?
- 12 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is the value of the proposed arms package?
- The Trump administration is preparing to sell Israel a munitions package worth $2.8 billion. This figure is consistent across multiple reports, including those from Reuters, The Washington Post, and Anadolu Ajansı.
- What types of bombs are included in the package?
- The package is reported to include 40,000 bombs weighing 2,000 pounds each. Specific types mentioned are MK-84 and BLU-117. The Washington Post and Anadolu Ajansı provided details on the quantities of each type.
- Why are these bombs considered controversial?
- The 2,000-pound bombs, particularly the MK-84, are described as highly destructive. Reports indicate that Israel has used similar munitions extensively in Gaza and Lebanon, and their use has been linked to significant civilian casualties.
Read it at the source
12 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
1Centre
4- Trump administration plans $2.8 billion munitions sale to Israel, sources say (opens WTVB in a new tab)
- Trump administration plans $2.8 billion munitions sale to Israel, sources say (opens Market Screener in a new tab)
Market Screener — is Market Screener biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump Plans Sale of 2,000-Pound Bombs to Israel (opens Political Wire in a new tab)
Political Wire — is Political Wire biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump administration plans $2.8 billion munitions sale to Israel, sources say (opens Reuters in a new tab)
Right
3- US to send $2.8B arms package for Israel including controversial bombs: WaPo (opens Anadolu Ajansı in a new tab)
Anadolu Ajansı — is Anadolu Ajansı biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump intends to transfer 40 heavy bombs to Israel (opens news-pravda.com in a new tab)
news-pravda.com — is news-pravda.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump Intends to Hand over 40,000 Heavy Bombs to Israel. (opens topwar.ru in a new tab)
Not rated
4- Reuters: Trump Administration Plans $2.8 Billion Arms Sale to Israel (opens Naftemporiki in a new tab)
Naftemporiki — is Naftemporiki biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US Is Preparing to Sell Israel a New Shipment of 2,000-Pound Aerial Bombs, Writing to WP (opens 1prime.ru in a new tab)
- Media: Trump Administration Plans to Sell Weapons to Israel for $2.8 Billion (opens Unknown in a new tab)
Unknown
- Washington Post: The US Intends to Sell Tens of Thousands of Heavy Aerial Bombs to Israel for $2.8 Billion (opens NEWSru.co.il in a new tab)
NEWSru.co.il — is NEWSru.co.il biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


