Skip to the story
All stories

Lancet report identifies 17 threats to human survival by 2100

Malicious use of AI and nuclear conflict are named as top dangers in a new global risk assessment.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Lancet report identifies 17 threats to human survival by 2100

What this story says

  • A report in The Lancet identifies 17 major threats to human survival by 2100.
  • Malicious use of artificial intelligence and nuclear conflict are named as the top two threats.
  • Other identified threats include climate change, obesity, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemics.
  • The report stresses that these threats are interconnected and require joint action.

Who covered it

Left 31%(14)Centre 40%(17)Right 29%(12)

Percentages are shares of the 43 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 64 of the 107 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

68/100

107 sources · methodology

Seventeen major threats to human survival by the year 2100 have been identified in a report published in The Lancet. The assessment highlights the malicious use of artificial intelligence and nuclear conflict as the most significant dangers. Other identified threats include climate change, obesity, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemics. The report's authors suggest these threats are interconnected and should be addressed collectively.

Coverage

Omissions

None of the left-rated digests mention the specific number of experts involved in preparing the report. None of the centre-rated digests mention the specific number of experts involved in preparing the report. None of the right-rated digests mention the specific number of experts involved in preparing the report.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 7 times, most recently on 12 Oct 2026, 09:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Threats range from nuclear war to obesity
Metro NewsLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

14 rated outlets

  • Digests from left-rated outlets led on the report's warning that artificial intelligence and nuclear war threaten humanity's extinction by 2100. These reports mentioned the 17 identified threats, including disease, social and economic conditions, environmental change, technology, and conflict. Some digests noted that action to prevent nuclear conflict could avert an estimated 133 million deaths. One digest stated that India faces all 17 threats and quoted Dr Soumya Swaminathan calling for long-term planning and a stronger Indian voice in global health negotiations.

Centre

17 rated outlets

  • Digests from centre-rated outlets focused on the report's identification of 17 "catastrophic threats" to human health over the next 75 years, including the climate crisis and child malnutrition. These reports highlighted nuclear war and the malicious use of AI, particularly its potential role in developing bioweapons, as existential threats. One digest mentioned that the threats are interlinked and should be addressed jointly.

Right

12 rated outlets

  • Digests from right-rated outlets highlighted the report's warning that humanity could be extinct by 2100 due to 17 interrelated factors. Nuclear war and the malicious use of artificial intelligence were frequently cited as the top threats. Some digests mentioned that the report was prepared by a commission of experts and that the threats must be addressed jointly, not in isolation. One digest noted that the British magazine Lancet identified these threats.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Lancet report identifies 17 threats to human survival by 2100?
Of the 43 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 31% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 29% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 107. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Lancet report identifies 17 threats to human survival by 2100 left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 43 rated outlets on this story, 31% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 29% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Lancet report identifies 17 threats to human survival by 2100 biased?
Lancet report identifies 17 threats to human survival by 2100 is one event reported by 107 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Lancet report identifies 17 threats to human survival by 2100?
107 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What are the main threats to human survival identified by the Lancet report?
The Lancet report identifies 17 major threats to human survival by 2100. The top two threats highlighted are the malicious use of artificial intelligence and nuclear conflict. Other significant dangers include climate change, obesity, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemics.
Why are the identified threats considered interconnected?
The report suggests that the 17 identified threats are interconnected, meaning they influence and exacerbate one another. Because of this interconnectedness, the authors recommend that these threats should be addressed jointly rather than in isolation to be effective.
What specific concerns are raised about artificial intelligence?
The report specifically flags the malicious use of artificial intelligence as a major threat. This includes concerns about its potential role in developing bioweapons and its deliberate application for harmful purposes, posing a significant risk to humanity's future.

Read it at the source

107 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

14
Show 6 more

Centre

17
Show 9 more

Right

12
Show 4 more

Not rated

64
Show 56 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Lancet Report 17 Threats | MediaBias News