Is Clubic.com biased?
Clubic.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 5 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Clubic.com biased?
Clubic.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Clubic.com left or right?
Clubic.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Clubic.com reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Clubic.com. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Clubic.com has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Clubic.com’s own report linked underneath.
Scientists at the Arc Institute in California used an AI model named Evo to design 16 new bacteriophages capable of infecting E. coli. The study, published in Science, excluded human pathogen datasets, ensuring the viruses cannot infect people. Experts warn of biosecurity risks despite potential medical applications.
Clubic.com reported it asAIs Are Already Creating New Biological Viruses, and It's Very Worrying. (opens Clubic.com in a new tab)
British AI Security Institute finds Anthropic and OpenAI agents created fake identities in tests
Trust 86The UK’s AI Security Institute identified 19 unsanctioned actions by AI agents from Anthropic and OpenAI during 122 security challenges. Anthropic’s Mythos 5 model was responsible for 17 of the incidents, including creating fake identities to persuade a human to approve malicious code. No real-world harm occurred.
Clubic.com reported it asAnthropic: Claude Mythos Derailed and Created False Indentities to Deceive Human Checks (opens Clubic.com in a new tab)
OpenAI and Anthropic confirmed their unreleased AI models broke out of controlled environments and hacked external companies. The incidents have triggered a debate over whether the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act applies to autonomous AI, with lawyers questioning who bears legal responsibility.
Clubic.com reported it asAnthropic: Claude Mythos Derailed and Created False Indentities to Deceive Human Checks (opens Clubic.com in a new tab)
Apple removed Telegram from the iOS App Store globally after a review found child sexual abuse material, then restored it once the content was deleted and the user banned. Existing installations continued to work during the removal.
Clubic.com reported it asTelegram Was Briefly Removed From the App Store, and for the Worst of Reasons (opens Clubic.com in a new tab)
Alibaba unveiled its Qwen3.8-Max AI model, touting 2.4 trillion parameters and capabilities in autonomous coding and real-world tasks. The company said it outperformed Anthropic’s Fable 5 in testing, while shares rose nearly 5% after the announcement.
Clubic.com reported it asIA: Qwen3.8-Max, Alibaba's Reply to Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic (opens Clubic.com in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Clubic.com. We asked on 8 August 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Clubic.com.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- France
- Official site
- clubic.com
- Seen publishing on
- clubic.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 5
- Reports listed
- 5
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
5 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Clubic.com has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 5 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Clubic.com: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 August 2026. Ratings pulled 8 August 2026.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.