9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say
Pre-attack border crossings were informal for some residents, according to news digests.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say
Photograph: Narcity (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, individuals like Steven Backman could often cross the Canada-U.S. border with a simple wave from officials.
- Backman, a resident of St. Stephen, New Brunswick, frequently travelled to Calais, Maine, a practice common among locals.
- The informal border crossings, where officials might wave locals through after a brief visual check, were a feature of life before 9/11.
- Following the 9/11 attacks, Canada's approach to national security and border control underwent significant changes.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 22 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 24 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
30/100
Craft
45/100
Hype
20/100
24 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 22 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Before the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks, Steven Backman, a resident of St. Stephen, New Brunswick, could typically cross the border into Calais, Maine, with little more than a wave from customs officials. This informal practice was common for many residents who frequently travelled between the two countries. Officials would often recognise locals and permit passage after a brief inspection.
Coverage
Omissions
No right-rated reports covered this story. The digests from left and centre-rated outlets did not include specific details about the nature of the changes to Canada's national security approach after 9/11, beyond stating that such changes occurred.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 10 Sept 2026, 13:45, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
14 rated outlets
- Fourteen left-rated reports focused on the pre-9/11 ease of crossing the Canada-U.S. border. These digests noted that Steven Backman, like many residents of St. Stephen, New Brunswick, would travel frequently to Calais, Maine. They also highlighted that U.S. or Canadian customs officials would often wave locals through after a brief look. The reports stated that this informal system changed after the 9/11 attacks, altering Canada's approach to national security.
Centre
8 rated outlets
- Seven centre-rated reports also highlighted the pre-9/11 border crossing experiences. These digests mentioned Steven Backman's ability to cross the border with a simple wave and his frequent travel between St. Stephen, New Brunswick, and Calais, Maine. They noted that officials would often recognise locals and wave them through. The reports indicated that these practices changed following the 9/11 attacks, leading to shifts in Canada's national security posture.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover 9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say?
- Of the 22 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 64% are rated left, 36% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 24. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is 9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 22 rated outlets on this story, 64% are rated left, 36% are rated centre, 0% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of 9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say biased?
- 9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say is one event reported by 24 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting 9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered 9/11 changed Canada's border approach, reports say?
- 24 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- How did border crossings work before 9/11?
- Before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, border crossings between Canada and the U.S. were often informal for residents living near the border. People like Steven Backman could typically cross with a simple wave from officials who recognised them as locals.
- What changed after 9/11?
- The 9/11 attacks led to significant changes in Canada's approach to national security and border control. The informal crossing practices common before the attacks were altered, resulting in increased security measures.
- Which news outlets covered this story?
- Twenty-three news outlets, including National Observer, Battlefords NOW, Narcity, and The Toronto Star, published reports on how 9/11 changed Canada's border security approach. No right-rated outlets covered the story.
Read it at the source
24 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
14- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to our national security (opens National Observer in a new tab)
National Observer — is National Observer biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens flamboroughtoday.com in a new tab)
flamboroughtoday.com — is flamboroughtoday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens thealbertan.com in a new tab)
thealbertan.com — is thealbertan.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Timmins Today in a new tab)
Timmins Today — is Timmins Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens ElliotLakeToday.com in a new tab)
ElliotLakeToday.com — is ElliotLakeToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Guelph Today in a new tab)
Guelph Today — is Guelph Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Bay Today in a new tab)
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Sudbury in a new tab)
Show 6 more
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Thorold Today in a new tab)
Thorold Today — is Thorold Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Collingwood Today in a new tab)
Collingwood Today — is Collingwood Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Orillia Matters in a new tab)
Orillia Matters — is Orillia Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens SooToday.com in a new tab)
SooToday.com — is SooToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Rocky Mountain Outlook in a new tab)
Rocky Mountain Outlook — is Rocky Mountain Outlook biased? Our profile of this outlet
- ‘Consequences we live with’: How 9/11 changed Canada’s approach to national security (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
8- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Castanet in a new tab)
- ‘Consequences we live with’: How 9/11 changed Canada’s approach to national security (opens Battlefords NOW in a new tab)
Battlefords NOW — is Battlefords NOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Narcity in a new tab)
- ‘Consequences we live with’: How 9/11 changed Canada’s approach to national security (opens CFJC Today Kamloops in a new tab)
CFJC Today Kamloops — is CFJC Today Kamloops biased? Our profile of this outlet
- ‘Consequences we live with’: How 9/11 changed Canada’s approach to national security (opens Ckpg Today in a new tab)
Ckpg Today — is Ckpg Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Medicine Hat News in a new tab)
Medicine Hat News — is Medicine Hat News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- ‘Consequences we live with’: How 9/11 changed Canada’s approach to national security (opens meadowlakeNOW in a new tab)
meadowlakeNOW — is meadowlakeNOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
2- ‘Consequences we live with’: How 9/11 changed Canada’s approach to national security (opens Loonie Politics in a new tab)
Loonie Politics — is Loonie Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Consequences we live with': How 9/11 changed Canada's approach to national security (opens Airdrie City View in a new tab)
Airdrie City View — is Airdrie City View biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.



