Appeals court blocks order to reopen Diversity Visa lottery

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Appeals court blocks order to reopen Diversity Visa lottery?

Of the 17 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 6% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 77% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 19. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is Appeals court blocks order to reopen Diversity Visa lottery left or right?

The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 77% of the 17 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.

Is the coverage of Appeals court blocks order to reopen Diversity Visa lottery biased?

Appeals court blocks order to reopen Diversity Visa lottery is one event reported by 19 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting Appeals court blocks order to reopen Diversity Visa lottery?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered Appeals court blocks order to reopen Diversity Visa lottery?

19 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What did the appeals court rule regarding the Diversity Visa lottery?

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked a lower court's order that would have forced the State Department to open the 2027 Diversity Visa lottery. The court ruled 2-1 that the law firm Red Eagle did not have standing to sue the federal government over the program's pause.

Why did the State Department pause the Diversity Visa program?

The State Department ordered an indefinite pause on issuing diversity visas after a Portuguese national, who received a 2017 lottery visa, carried out a mass shooting at Brown University. The attack resulted in two deaths and nine injuries.

Did the court rule on the State Department's actions?

The appeals court stated its decision was based on procedural grounds, specifically that the law firm lacked standing to sue. The court explicitly wrote that it did not endorse the Department's failure to open the lottery registration period.