Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court
The 9th Circuit ruled it lacked jurisdiction to hear the Justice Department's request.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court
Photograph: The Independent (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected the Justice Department's request to set aside about 20,000 California mail-in ballots suspected of being cast by noncitizens.
- The appeals court panel ruled 2-1 that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the Justice Department's emergency appeal at this stage.
- The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court in California, where a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday.
- Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez formed the majority, while Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 43 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 46 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
76/100
Craft
85/100
Hype
30/100
46 sources · methodology
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a request from the Justice Department to set aside approximately 20,000 California mail-in ballots that the department alleges belong to noncitizens. The panel of judges ruled 2-1 that the appeals court does not have jurisdiction to hear the Justice Department's request at this stage of the litigation.
The ruling sends the case back to the U.S. District Court in California, where a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday. Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez joined the majority opinion, while Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented. The Justice Department had appealed to the 9th Circuit after the district court judge did not issue a ruling last week.
Disagreement on the majority's reasoning
The majority opinion stated that the appeals court lacked jurisdiction, and that some of the delay in the case was attributable to the United States's own actions. Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented from this reasoning.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated, centre-rated, or right-rated digests mention the specific names of the judges who formed the majority or dissented in the case. The full reports from ABC News and KIFI name Judges Mark Bennett, Gabriel Sanchez, and Patrick Bumatay.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 27 Oct 2026, 00:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
17 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports led with the appeals court rejecting the Justice Department's request. Several reports highlighted that the case was sent back to the district court for a hearing. ABC News noted the ruling was a rejection of the Trump administration's lawsuit. The Los Angeles Times stated the decision clears the way for the lower court to proceed with hearing the case. Other left-rated outlets, including Rocky Mountain Outlook, Orillia Matters, Collingwood Today, Bowen Island Undercurrent, Sudbury, ElliotLakeToday.com, thealbertan.com, and The Independent, used headlines that focused on the court declining to rule on the federal bid to set aside ballots.
Centre
24 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports also focused on the appeals court rejecting the Justice Department's request. KIFI reported that the court denied the Justice Department's emergency appeal. Many centre-rated outlets, such as KSBW, WCVB, WLKY, Koco News5, WTAE, WISN, KETV, WVTM, and KOAT, used headlines stating the appeals court declined to rule on the federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens. Telemundo 20 and Telemundo 52 reported that the Trump administration refused to separate the ballots.
Right
2 rated outlets
- The single right-rated report, from RedState, stated that the 9th Circuit denied the DOJ appeal to block California from processing likely noncitizen mail ballots. Its headline also noted that the case heads back to district court.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court?
- Of the 43 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 40% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 5% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 46. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 43 rated outlets on this story, 40% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 5% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court biased?
- Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court is one event reported by 46 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which outlets covered Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court?
- 46 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rule?
- The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Justice Department's request to set aside approximately 20,000 California mail-in ballots alleged to be from noncitizens. The court ruled it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal at this stage.
- What happens next in the case?
- The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court in California. A hearing is scheduled to take place on Tuesday to address the Justice Department's lawsuit.
- Was the appeals court ruling unanimous?
- No, the ruling from the three-judge panel was split 2-1. Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez joined the majority decision, while Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented.
Read it at the source
46 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
17- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens thealbertan.com in a new tab)
thealbertan.com — is thealbertan.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens ElliotLakeToday.com in a new tab)
ElliotLakeToday.com — is ElliotLakeToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Sudbury in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Bowen Island Undercurrent in a new tab)
Bowen Island Undercurrent — is Bowen Island Undercurrent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Collingwood Today in a new tab)
Collingwood Today — is Collingwood Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Orillia Matters in a new tab)
Orillia Matters — is Orillia Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Rocky Mountain Outlook in a new tab)
Rocky Mountain Outlook — is Rocky Mountain Outlook biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Enid News & Eagle in a new tab)
Enid News & Eagle — is Enid News & Eagle biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 9 more
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 9th Circuit denies feds' appeal over 20,000 ballots; district court hearing to proceed (opens Los Angeles Times in a new tab)
Los Angeles Times — is Los Angeles Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court rejects Trump admin's voting lawsuit against California (opens ABC News in a new tab)
- Federal appeals court declines to rule on Justice Department bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens The Daily Item in a new tab)
The Daily Item — is The Daily Item biased? Our profile of this outlet
- DOJ can’t leapfrog lower court in bid to block 20,000 California voters, appeals court rules (opens Democracy Docket in a new tab)
Democracy Docket — is Democracy Docket biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court rejects Trump DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots (opens CNN in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens St Catharines Standard in a new tab)
St Catharines Standard — is St Catharines Standard biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court rejects DOJ’s bid to quickly force California to set aside ballots (opens Politico in a new tab)
Centre
24- 9th Circuit dismisses feds' latest effort to regulate California elections (opens Everett Post in a new tab)
Everett Post — is Everett Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens KSBW in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens MOR-TV in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens KHBS in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WGAL in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WPBF in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens KOAT in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WVTM in a new tab)
Show 16 more
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens KETV in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WISN in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WTAE in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Koco News5 in a new tab)
Koco News5 — is Koco News5 biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WLKY in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WCVB in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Henry Herald in a new tab)
Henry Herald — is Henry Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Security Check (opens WKBT in a new tab)
- Appeals court rejects Trump DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots (opens Local 3 News in a new tab)
Local 3 News — is Local 3 News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Appeals court rejects Trump DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots (opens KWWL in a new tab)
- Appeals court dismisses Justice Department effort to challenge California ballots (opens KCRA 3 in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens WKMG in a new tab)
- Appeals court rejects Trump DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots (opens KRDO in a new tab)
- Appeals court rejects Trump DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots (opens KIFI in a new tab)
- Appeals court declines to rule on federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- DOJ Bid for Fast Ruling in California Voting Case Rejected (opens Bloomberg in a new tab)
Right
2Not rated
3- Trump Administration Refuses to Separate 20,000 Ballots in California · Global Voices (opens Telemundo 52 in a new tab)
Telemundo 52 — is Telemundo 52 biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump Administration Refuses to Separate 20,000 Ballots in California · Global Voices (opens Telemundo 20 in a new tab)
Telemundo 20 — is Telemundo 20 biased? Our profile of this outlet
- DOJ Bid for Fast Ruling in California Voting Case Rejected (opens BizToc in a new tab)
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
