Skip to the story
All stories

Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court

The 9th Circuit ruled it lacked jurisdiction to hear the Justice Department's request.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court

What this story says

  • The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected the Justice Department's request to set aside about 20,000 California mail-in ballots suspected of being cast by noncitizens.
  • The appeals court panel ruled 2-1 that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the Justice Department's emergency appeal at this stage.
  • The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court in California, where a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday.
  • Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez formed the majority, while Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented.

Who covered it

Left 40%(17)Centre 55%(24)Right 5%(2)

Percentages are shares of the 43 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 46 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

76/100

Craft

85/100

Hype

30/100

46 sources · methodology

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a request from the Justice Department to set aside approximately 20,000 California mail-in ballots that the department alleges belong to noncitizens. The panel of judges ruled 2-1 that the appeals court does not have jurisdiction to hear the Justice Department's request at this stage of the litigation.

The ruling sends the case back to the U.S. District Court in California, where a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday. Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez joined the majority opinion, while Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented. The Justice Department had appealed to the 9th Circuit after the district court judge did not issue a ruling last week.

Disagreement on the majority's reasoning

The majority opinion stated that the appeals court lacked jurisdiction, and that some of the delay in the case was attributable to the United States's own actions. Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented from this reasoning.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated, centre-rated, or right-rated digests mention the specific names of the judges who formed the majority or dissented in the case. The full reports from ABC News and KIFI name Judges Mark Bennett, Gabriel Sanchez, and Patrick Bumatay.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 27 Oct 2026, 00:15, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

17 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports led with the appeals court rejecting the Justice Department's request. Several reports highlighted that the case was sent back to the district court for a hearing. ABC News noted the ruling was a rejection of the Trump administration's lawsuit. The Los Angeles Times stated the decision clears the way for the lower court to proceed with hearing the case. Other left-rated outlets, including Rocky Mountain Outlook, Orillia Matters, Collingwood Today, Bowen Island Undercurrent, Sudbury, ElliotLakeToday.com, thealbertan.com, and The Independent, used headlines that focused on the court declining to rule on the federal bid to set aside ballots.

Centre

24 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports also focused on the appeals court rejecting the Justice Department's request. KIFI reported that the court denied the Justice Department's emergency appeal. Many centre-rated outlets, such as KSBW, WCVB, WLKY, Koco News5, WTAE, WISN, KETV, WVTM, and KOAT, used headlines stating the appeals court declined to rule on the federal bid to set aside California ballots of alleged noncitizens. Telemundo 20 and Telemundo 52 reported that the Trump administration refused to separate the ballots.

Right

2 rated outlets

  • The single right-rated report, from RedState, stated that the 9th Circuit denied the DOJ appeal to block California from processing likely noncitizen mail ballots. Its headline also noted that the case heads back to district court.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court?
Of the 43 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 40% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 5% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 46. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 43 rated outlets on this story, 40% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 5% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court biased?
Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court is one event reported by 46 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Appeals court sends noncitizen ballot case back to district court?
46 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rule?
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Justice Department's request to set aside approximately 20,000 California mail-in ballots alleged to be from noncitizens. The court ruled it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal at this stage.
What happens next in the case?
The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court in California. A hearing is scheduled to take place on Tuesday to address the Justice Department's lawsuit.
Was the appeals court ruling unanimous?
No, the ruling from the three-judge panel was split 2-1. Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez joined the majority decision, while Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented.

Read it at the source

46 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

17
Show 9 more

Centre

24
Show 16 more

Right

2

Not rated

3

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

9th Circuit Rules on California Ballots | MediaBias News