Skip to the story
All stories

Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and immediate compliance

The October 2024 Fort Leavenworth test showed volunteers stopped resisting within seconds, and ICE signed a $16.7 million contract for 6,000 pairs in August.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and immediate compliance

What this story says

  • An Army study at Fort Leavenworth in October 2024 found the gloves cause intense pain, fear and immediate compliance.
  • ICE signed a $16.7 million contract in August to buy 6,000 pairs of the gloves.
  • ICE has not responded to requests for comment about the study or deployment.
  • Sixteen senators have asked ICE to explain the purchase and safety measures, without receiving a reply.

Who covered it

Left 51%(21)Centre 34%(14)Right 15%(6)

Percentages are shares of the 41 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 23 of the 64 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

86/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

18/100

64 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 6 of the 41 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The U.S. Army conducted a test at the military prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, in October 2024. Participants who wore the electric shock gloves reported severe pain, stopped fighting within seconds and expressed fear of further shocks. The study concluded that the devices produced immediate compliance and heightened apprehension among the volunteers.

Records obtained by the watchdog group American Oversight show that Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials were aware of the study’s findings before approving a contract in August. The contract, worth $16.7 million, calls for the purchase of 6,000 pairs of the gloves.

ICE has not answered an Associated Press request for comment on the study or on how the gloves will be used. The agency’s own description calls the devices “distraction and de‑escalation” tools intended to keep officers safer.

U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto and fifteen other Democratic senators sent a letter on 27 August asking ICE to cancel the purchase or explain safeguards. The agency has not replied to the senators’ inquiry.

““After experiencing the effects of the GLOVE, … participants stated just seeing the GLOVE was enough to make them want to comply,””

— authors of the Army study

$16.7 million

Contract amount

ICE signed in August for 6,000 pairs of shock gloves

Omissions

None of the right‑rated digests mention the $16.7 million contract amount that ICE signed for 6,000 pairs of shock gloves.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 7 Oct 2026, 03:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

21 rated outlets

  • Left‑rated outlets highlighted the intense pain and terror the gloves cause, describing them as a tool that could be used to intimidate detainees and protesters. They stressed safety concerns, noting that the study did not evaluate risks for children, pregnant women or people with disabilities, and quoted critics who warned the gloves could brutalise vulnerable populations.

Centre

14 rated outlets

  • Centre‑rated outlets reported the study’s findings, the $16.7 million contract and ICE’s claim that the gloves are “distraction and de‑escalation” devices. They included statements from ICE officials, the contract details, and the senators’ letters demanding answers, while also noting that ICE had not responded to media inquiries.

Right

6 rated outlets

  • Right‑rated outlets focused on the study’s demonstration that the gloves produce immediate compliance and fear, repeating the description of the devices as powerful non‑lethal tools. They reported ICE’s framing of the gloves as safer alternatives but did not mention the contract’s $16.7 million cost.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and…?
Of the 41 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 51% are rated left, 34% are rated centre, 15% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 64. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 41 rated outlets on this story, 51% are rated left, 34% are rated centre, 15% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and… biased?
Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and immediate compliance is one event reported by 64 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Army study finds ICE‑purchased shock gloves cause intense pain and…?
64 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the Army study find about the shock gloves?
The study, conducted at Fort Leavenworth in October 2024, recorded that volunteers who were fitted with the electric shock gloves experienced intense pain, stopped resisting within seconds and reported fear of additional shocks, indicating the devices force immediate compliance.
How much did ICE spend on the gloves and how many were ordered?
ICE signed a contract in August for $16.7 million to purchase 6,000 pairs of the shock gloves, according to records obtained by American Oversight and reported by multiple outlets.
Has ICE responded to questions about the study or the gloves?
ICE has not answered an Associated Press request for comment on the Army study or on how the gloves will be deployed, and it also has not replied to a letter from sixteen senators seeking details about the purchase and safety measures.
What action did senators take regarding the glove purchase?
Sixteen Democratic senators, led by Catherine Cortez Masto, sent a letter on 27 August asking ICE to cancel the purchase or explain how the gloves will be used and what safeguards are in place; the agency has not provided a response.

Read it at the source

64 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

21
Show 13 more

Centre

14
Show 6 more

Right

6

Not rated

23
Show 15 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

ICE Shock Gloves Study | MediaBias News