Is Temple Daily Telegram biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Temple Daily Telegram in the centre. We have not yet published a story this outlet appeared on.
The short answers
Is Temple Daily Telegram biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Temple Daily Telegram in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Temple Daily Telegram left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places Temple Daily Telegram in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Temple Daily Telegram reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Temple Daily Telegram. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Temple Daily Telegram has been covering
None yet. This fills in as Temple Daily Telegram appears on stories we publish, and each entry links both to the outlet’s own report and to ours.
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MediacenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
- Frank Mayborn EnterprisesCorporationdirect owner
- Frank MaybornCorporationparent group
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- tdtnews.com
- Seen publishing on
- tdtnews.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
We have not published a story Temple Daily Telegram appeared on. It has a page here because it turned up in the coverage of a story we were reading, which happens well before we have written anything it is part of. Measured 7 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Temple Daily Telegram, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.