Australian teens returning to social media despite usage ban
New data suggests social media use among Australian children aged 13-15 is nearing pre-ban levels.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Australian teens returning to social media despite usage ban
Photograph: Irish Examiner (embedded from source)
What this story says
- 26% of Australian children aged 13-15 used TikTok last month, close to pre-ban levels, according to Qustodio data.
- Usage rates for Instagram and Snapchat have also begun to increase after an initial fall following the ban.
- Australia's government plans to double the maximum penalty for social media violations to A$99m.
- No social media platform has yet been fined for breaching the ban.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 29 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 12 of the 41 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
50/100
Craft
65/100
Hype
45/100
41 sources · methodology
Eight months after Australia introduced a ban on social media use for those under 16, data from parental control software maker Qustodio suggests that younger users are returning to these platforms. Last month, 26% of Australian children aged 13 to 15 used TikTok, a figure only one percentage point lower than before the rules were enacted. For children aged 10 to 12, usage rates are now higher than they were prior to the ban.
Usage rates for Instagram and Snapchat, while lower than TikTok, have also started to rise after an initial decrease when the ban took effect in December. Yasmin London, a global online safety expert at Qustodio, stated that while there was an initial drop, numbers have slowly increased again to near equivalent levels for some services. She suggested that children might be obscuring their ages, using VPNs, or not encountering effective age verification on platforms. Qustodio's research was based on anonymised information from 19,000 Australian families.
Australia's government has been a leader in legislating to prevent underage users from accessing services like Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok, with other countries, including New Zealand, announcing similar plans. The government stated in June that social media companies were not doing enough to comply with the age restriction, which requires firms to take reasonable steps to keep under-16s off their platforms or face fines. The government has pledged to double the maximum penalty for violations to A$99 million and to grant the country's online safety watchdog additional enforcement powers. As of now, no social media platform has been fined for breaching the ban.
Coverage comparison
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated reports mention the Qustodio data being collected only from devices with its parental oversight software installed, which the source material states may understate the issue. The reports also do not mention Meta's WhatsApp seeing an increase in usage, which is not subject to the government's restrictions.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 26 Aug 2026, 20:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
11 rated outlets
- The Irish Examiner reported that 26% of Australian children aged 13-15 were on TikTok last month, a figure close to pre-ban levels. The outlet noted that usage rates for Instagram and Snapchat have also begun to increase after initially falling. It highlighted that Australia's government has pledged to double the maximum penalty for social media violations to A$99m, and that no platform has been fined so far. The report quoted Yasmin London, a global online safety expert at Qustodio, who suggested children may be using methods to circumvent age checks. The Irish Examiner also mentioned that other countries are following Australia's example in legislating against underage social media use.
Centre
9 rated outlets
- Centre-rated outlets reported that Australian under-16s are increasing their use of social media apps like Instagram and TikTok. This rise is occurring despite a ban implemented in December. Data for this reporting came from the parental control app Qustodio.
- Channel News Asia, which published a full report, stated that usage fell initially after the ban but has since climbed. This outlet quoted Yasmin London, a global online safety expert for Qustodio, who suggested VPNs or age obfuscation as possible reasons for continued access.
- The reports noted that messaging platform WhatsApp, which is not affected by the ban, is also seeing increased use among children. Some outlets mentioned that Australian officials stated the ban aims to protect children from online bullying and predatory algorithms.
Right
9 rated outlets
- Right-rated outlets reported that Australian under-16s are increasing their use of social media apps like Instagram and TikTok. This trend emerged despite a ban implemented in December 2025, which aimed to restrict children's access to these platforms.
- Data from a parental control software company was cited across these reports. Some digests noted that the ban is proving ineffective, with one suggesting that VPNs are being used to circumvent age restrictions.
- One digest mentioned that the rate of use for children aged 10 to 12 is now higher than before the ban was introduced. The reports also noted that other countries, including the UK and France, have followed Australia's lead with similar measures.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Australian teens returning to social media despite usage ban?
- Of the 29 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 38% are rated left, 31% are rated centre, 31% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 41. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Australian teens returning to social media despite usage ban left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 29 rated outlets on this story, 38% are rated left, 31% are rated centre, 31% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Australian teens returning to social media despite usage ban biased?
- Australian teens returning to social media despite usage ban is one event reported by 41 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which outlets covered Australian teens returning to social media despite usage ban?
- 41 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What percentage of Australian children aged 13-15 are using TikTok?
- According to data from Qustodio, 26% of Australian children aged 13 to 15 were using TikTok last month. This figure is only one percentage point lower than the rate observed before Australia implemented its ban on social media use for under-16s.
- What is Australia's penalty for social media violations?
- Australia's government has pledged to double the maximum penalty for social media violations to A$99 million. This measure is part of efforts to enforce age restrictions on social media platforms for users under 16.
- Have social media platforms been fined for breaching the ban?
- No social media platform has been fined for breaching Australia's ban on social media use for under-16s so far. The government has stated that companies are not doing enough to comply with the age restriction.
Read it at the source
41 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
11- Australia's social media ban for kids is a flop (opens Business Insider in a new tab)
Business Insider — is Business Insider biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Australia: Use of Social Media Goes Back to Under 16 Years After Being Banned (opens La Presse in a new tab)
- In Australia, the Use of Social Networks Goes Back to Young People After Being Banned at the End of December. (opens Liberation in a new tab)
Liberation — is Liberation biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Eight months after Australia’s ban, teen TikTok use is down one percentage point (opens TNW in a new tab)
- Unexpected Effect After Banning Social Networks in Australia for Children Under 16 Years of Age. What Happens 9 Months After the Law Comes Into Force - HotNews.ro (opens Hot News in a new tab)
- In Australia, the Use of Social Media Goes Back to Those Under 16 Years of Age After Being Banned. (opens Le Temps in a new tab)
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban: data (opens The New Indian Express in a new tab)
The New Indian Express — is The New Indian Express biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Teens return to TikTok after world’s first usage ban (opens Taipei Times in a new tab)
Taipei Times — is Taipei Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 3 more
- Australia's teens flock back to TikTok despite world-first social media ban (opens Los Angeles Times in a new tab)
Los Angeles Times — is Los Angeles Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Australia sees teenagers return to social media despite world’s first usage ban (opens Irish Examiner in a new tab)
Irish Examiner — is Irish Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Australian teens returning to TikTok after ban, data shows (opens Irish Times in a new tab)
Irish Times — is Irish Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
9- Failed. More and More Young Australians Under 16 Use Social Networks After Banning Them (opens Digi 24 in a new tab)
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban: Data (opens TechXplore in a new tab)
TechXplore — is TechXplore biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Despite Ban, Youth Social Media Use in Australia Has Increased Again (opens Lietuvos Radijas ir Televizija in a new tab)
- Australia: Social Media Use Goes Back to Children Under 16 Years of Age After Being Banned (opens Sud Ouest in a new tab)
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban: data (opens France24 in a new tab)
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban: data (opens Radio France Internationale in a new tab)
Radio France Internationale — is Radio France Internationale biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s despite ban (opens Channel News Asia in a new tab)
Channel News Asia — is Channel News Asia biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban: data (opens Hindustan Times in a new tab)
Hindustan Times — is Hindustan Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
9- Use of Social Networks Under the Age of 16 in Australia Recovers After Prohibition (opens Observador in a new tab)
Observador — is Observador biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use rebounds among Australian children despite under-16 ban (opens Malay Mail in a new tab)
Malay Mail — is Malay Mail biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Australia: Use of Social Networks by Under 16s Goes Back After Its Ban (opens Le Figaro in a new tab)
- Opposite Effect: Use of Social Networks by Minors Increases in Australia After Ban (opens Globo in a new tab)
- This Country Vetoed Use of Social Networks Among Children Under 16, but Their Use Rather Picked Up (opens La Nación, Grupo Nación in a new tab)
La Nación, Grupo Nación — is La Nación, Grupo Nación biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban (opens Free Malaysia Today News in a new tab)
Free Malaysia Today News — is Free Malaysia Today News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Teens return to TikTok after world’s first usage ban, data show (opens The Print in a new tab)
- Australian teens return to TikTok after world's first ban, new data shows (opens Irish Independent in a new tab)
Irish Independent — is Irish Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
12- Social Media Use Among Minors Under 16 in Australia Recovers After Ban. (opens Publico in a new tab)
- Use of Networks Recovers in Australia After Prohibition to Children Under 16 Years of Age (opens Noticias ao Minuto in a new tab)
Noticias ao Minuto — is Noticias ao Minuto biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use rebounds among Australian children despite under-16 ban (opens AlKhaleej Today in a new tab)
AlKhaleej Today — is AlKhaleej Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Australia: Despite the Ban, Under-16s Are Increasingly Using Social Networks (opens cnews.fr in a new tab)
- What Happened After Australia Banned Social Networks for Children Under 16 Years Old. The Data Are Worrying (opens Stirile Pro TV in a new tab)
Stirile Pro TV — is Stirile Pro TV biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s despite ban (opens theasialive.com in a new tab)
theasialive.com — is theasialive.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban: data (opens The Frontier Post in a new tab)
The Frontier Post — is The Frontier Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social Networks in Australia: Use Goes Back to Young People (opens RTS in a new tab)
Show 4 more
- The Use of Social Media Goes Back to Australia for Those Under 16 Years of Age After Their Ban (opens ouest-france.fr in a new tab)
ouest-france.fr — is ouest-france.fr biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Social media use on the rise among Australian under-16s after ban: data (opens rtl.lu in a new tab)
- Australia tried to keep kids off social media. Its ban has had the opposite effect. (opens Tubefilter in a new tab)
Tubefilter — is Tubefilter biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Use of Social Networks Among Australian Minors Says Despite a Ban, According to Qustodio Figures (opens El Economista in a new tab)
El Economista — is El Economista biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

