Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking
An expert panel recommends reducing the temporary resident population and enhancing data collection on departures.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking
Photograph: City News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Canada needs to reduce the number of temporary residents and improve data on their departures, stated Parisa Mahboubi, chair of the C.D. Howe Institute’s immigration targets council.
- As of June 30, Canada had 632,000 study permit holders and 1.5 million temporary work permit holders.
- The government's objective is to decrease the temporary resident population to below five per cent of the total population by the end of 2027.
- Michelle Rempel Garner argued that immigration levels should align with Canada's capacity to provide jobs, housing, and healthcare.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 19 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 21 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
60/100
Hype
20/100
21 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 19 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Canada should implement further reductions in its temporary resident population and develop more effective methods for tracking individuals who leave the country, according to Parisa Mahboubi, chair of the C.D. Howe Institute’s immigration targets council. This council is preparing a submission for the government's annual immigration levels consultation.
Mahboubi stated that Canada is currently operating without clear data on visa renewals and the number of non-permanent residents with expired permits who depart the country. She indicated that assumptions are made about people leaving when their status expires, rather than having concrete data. As of June 30, there were 632,000 study permit holders and 1.5 million temporary work permit holders. The government's stated goal is to reduce the temporary resident population to less than five per cent of the total population by the end of 2027, a level that was exceeded in October 2024 when it reached over seven per cent.
Michelle Rempel Garner, the Conservative immigration critic, commented that immigration levels, encompassing both temporary and permanent residents, should be adjusted to match Canada's capacity to offer jobs, housing, and healthcare. She suggested that current immigration levels are not fair to newcomers seeking a better life or to Canadians already facing unemployment.
The government has also revised its targets for new permanent residents. The former Liberal government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had planned for 500,000 new permanent residents in both 2025 and 2026. This target was later reduced to 395,000 for 2025 and 380,000 for 2026. Mahboubi noted that these figures do not account for one-time programs that could grant status to approximately 148,000 individuals between 2026 and 2027, including protected persons and skilled workers.
Rempel Garner also raised concerns about a perceived two-tiered justice system, where non-citizens may receive reduced sentences to avoid immigration consequences. She cited lawyers who have indicated this practice is common. A 2019 review by the University of Saskatchewan College of Law examined 40 cases with sentences under six months, finding that in 19 of these instances, immigration consequences influenced the sentence reduction, often by a small margin.
Disagreements in reporting
The reports do not present any factual disagreements.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated reports printed below mention the government's goal to reduce the temporary resident population to less than five per cent of the total population by the end of 2027. No right-rated outlet ran this story.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 6 times, most recently on 30 Aug 2026, 14:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
11 rated outlets
- Reports from outlets rated left led on the call for further cuts to temporary residents and improved tracking of departures. They highlighted Parisa Mahboubi's statement that Canada is "flying in the dark" regarding data on non-permanent residents. These reports also included Michelle Rempel Garner's criticism that immigration levels should be tailored to Canada's ability to provide jobs, housing, and healthcare, and her assertion that current levels are unfair to both newcomers and unemployed Canadians. The reduction in permanent resident targets from 500,000 to 395,000 for 2025 and 380,000 for 2026 was also noted. The left-rated reports mentioned Rempel Garner's concerns about a "two-tiered justice system" and cited the University of Saskatchewan College of Law review of cases where immigration consequences influenced sentencing.
Centre
8 rated outlets
- Reports from outlets rated centre also focused on the recommendation to reduce temporary residents and enhance tracking of those leaving the country, citing Parisa Mahboubi. They noted the current numbers of study and work permit holders and the government's goal to reduce the temporary resident population to under five per cent of the total population by 2027. These reports included Michelle Rempel Garner's comments on aligning immigration levels with Canada's capacity for jobs, housing, and healthcare. The revised permanent resident targets for 2025 and 2026 were also mentioned, as were Rempel Garner's remarks on the justice system and the University of Saskatchewan study on sentencing.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking?
- Of the 19 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 58% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 21. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 19 rated outlets on this story, 58% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 0% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking biased?
- Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking is one event reported by 21 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Canada urged to cut temporary residents and improve tracking?
- 21 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is the main recommendation regarding temporary residents in Canada?
- The main recommendation is that Canada needs to make further cuts to the number of temporary residents and generate better tracking data for when they leave the country. This call comes from Parisa Mahboubi, chair of the C.D. Howe Institute’s immigration targets council.
- How many temporary residents are currently in Canada?
- As of June 30, there were 632,000 study permit holders and 1.5 million temporary work permit holders in Canada. The temporary resident population was estimated to be around 2.5 million people, or about 6.2 per cent of the total population, as of last spring.
- What is the government's target for temporary residents?
- The government's goal is to reduce the temporary resident population to less than five per cent of the total population by the end of 2027. At its peak in October 2024, the temporary resident population represented more than seven per cent of the total population.
- What concerns have been raised about the justice system and immigration?
- Concerns have been raised about a potential 'two-tiered justice system' where non-citizens might receive lighter sentences to avoid immigration consequences. A 2019 review examined cases where immigration factors influenced sentence reductions, with 19 out of 40 cases showing this influence.
Read it at the source
21 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
11- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Timmins Today in a new tab)
Timmins Today — is Timmins Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Bradford Today in a new tab)
Bradford Today — is Bradford Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens InnisfilToday.ca in a new tab)
InnisfilToday.ca — is InnisfilToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Bay Today in a new tab)
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Sudbury in a new tab)
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Bowen Island Undercurrent in a new tab)
Bowen Island Undercurrent — is Bowen Island Undercurrent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Thorold Today in a new tab)
Thorold Today — is Thorold Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Orillia Matters in a new tab)
Orillia Matters — is Orillia Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 3 more
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens SooToday.com in a new tab)
SooToday.com — is SooToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens St Catharines Standard in a new tab)
St Catharines Standard — is St Catharines Standard biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
8- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Narcity in a new tab)
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Ckpg Today in a new tab)
Ckpg Today — is Ckpg Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Medicine Hat News in a new tab)
Medicine Hat News — is Medicine Hat News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens CFJC Today Kamloops in a new tab)
CFJC Today Kamloops — is CFJC Today Kamloops biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens meadowlakeNOW in a new tab)
meadowlakeNOW — is meadowlakeNOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Battlefords NOW in a new tab)
Battlefords NOW — is Battlefords NOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens City News in a new tab)
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
2- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Loonie Politics in a new tab)
Loonie Politics — is Loonie Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Immigration board asks feds to better track temporary residents (opens Airdrie City View in a new tab)
Airdrie City View — is Airdrie City View biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


