Skip to the story
All stories

Cook Political Report Adjusts Senate Race Ratings

Forecaster shifts Minnesota race toward GOP, while two others move toward Democrats.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published

What this story says

  • The Cook Political Report has changed its rating for the Minnesota U.S. Senate race from 'Likely Democrat' to 'Lean Democrat.'
  • This adjustment indicates a move toward greater competitiveness in the Minnesota contest, favouring the Republican nominee.
  • The forecaster also shifted Senate races in South Carolina and Mississippi in favour of Democratic candidates.
  • RealClearPolitics polling shows Democratic candidate Peggy Flanagan leading by an average of 3.2% in Minnesota.

Who covered it

Left 13%(1)Centre 37%(3)Right 50%(4)

Percentages are shares of the 8 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 9 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

58/100

Craft

67/100

Hype

15/100

9 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 8 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The Cook Political Report, an election forecasting group, has adjusted its ratings for three U.S. Senate races. The Minnesota Senate race rating was moved from "Likely Democrat" to "Lean Democrat," a shift described as moving the contest toward greater competitiveness and favouring the Republican nominee. In South Carolina and Mississippi, the Cook Political Report shifted its ratings in favour of Democratic candidates.

Disagreement on South Carolina and Mississippi

The Cook Political Report shifted the South Carolina Senate race rating from "Likely Republican" to "Lean Republican," according to the Washington Examiner and Holy City Sinner. The Hill reported that the Cook Political Report shifted Mississippi toward a potential upset. Political Wire and the Cook Political Report itself stated that South Carolina and Mississippi were shifted in favour of Democrats.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the specific polling average for the Minnesota Senate race. None of the centre-rated digests mention the specific polling average for the Minnesota Senate race. None of the right-rated digests mention the specific shifts in the South Carolina and Mississippi Senate races, beyond noting that Minnesota moved toward the GOP and South Carolina moved left.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 21 Oct 2026, 02:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • The Washington Post reported that the Cook Political Report shifted its rating of the Minnesota U.S. Senate race toward Republicans. The report noted the contest is between Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan (D) and Republican Michele Tafoya, a former NFL broadcaster.

Centre

3 rated outlets

  • Political Wire and The Cook Political Report stated that candidate quality can magnify trends in Senate races, especially in midterms. Political Wire reported that the Cook Political Report made three rating changes: two in favour of Democrats in South Carolina and Mississippi, and one toward Republicans in Minnesota. The Cook Political Report itself noted these shifts were driven by candidate quality. The Hill reported that the Cook Political Report shifted two Senate races toward Democrats and one toward the GOP, including Minnesota to lean Democrat and Mississippi toward a potential upset.

Right

4 rated outlets

  • TrendingPolitics reported that the Cook Political Report adjusted Minnesota’s U.S. Senate race rating from "Likely Democrat" to "Lean Democrat," indicating greater competitiveness while still favouring Democrats under Cook’s definitions. News Addicts reported that this change signifies increasing competitiveness for GOP candidates. The Washington Examiner stated the Minnesota Senate race shifted toward the GOP nominee Michele Tafoya, while South Carolina moved left. Just the News reported that polling shows a close race in Minnesota, with Flanagan holding a 3.2% average lead according to RealClearPolitics.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Cook Political Report Adjusts Senate Race Ratings?
Of the 8 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 13% are rated left, 37% are rated centre, 50% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 9. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Cook Political Report Adjusts Senate Race Ratings left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 8 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Cook Political Report Adjusts Senate Race Ratings biased?
Cook Political Report Adjusts Senate Race Ratings is one event reported by 9 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Cook Political Report Adjusts Senate Race Ratings?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Cook Political Report Adjusts Senate Race Ratings?
9 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the Cook Political Report?
The Cook Political Report is a non-partisan election forecasting group that analyzes and rates U.S. political races. Its ratings, such as "Likely Democrat" or "Lean Republican," indicate the perceived competitiveness and likely outcome of elections.
How has the Minnesota Senate race rating changed?
The Cook Political Report has shifted its rating for the Minnesota U.S. Senate race from "Likely Democrat" to "Lean Democrat." This change suggests the race has become more competitive, with a slight advantage still leaning towards the Democratic party according to the forecaster's definitions.
Which other Senate races were affected by the Cook Political Report's update?
The Cook Political Report also adjusted its ratings for Senate races in South Carolina and Mississippi. These two races were shifted in favour of the Democratic candidates, indicating a move towards greater competitiveness or a Democratic advantage in those contests.

Read it at the source

9 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

3

Right

4

Not rated

1

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Cook Political Report Updates Senate Ratings | MediaBias News