DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns
A preservation official wrote to the Trump administration proposing slender columns instead of a 250-foot arch.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns
Photograph: Joe.My.God. (embedded from source)
What this story says
- President Donald Trump wants a 250-foot triumphal arch built near Arlington National Cemetery.
- A DC preservation official, C. Andrew Lewis, has proposed building slender columns instead.
- Lewis cited original designs from 1924 and a 1925 Act of Congress in a letter to the Trump administration.
- The proposal suggests abandoning the arch for an alternative that reflects the original intent of the monument.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 102 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 104 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
59/100
Hype
41/100
104 sources · methodology
Missing from the right
Only 7 of the 102 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
President Donald Trump has advocated for the construction of a 250-foot-tall triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery. This proposal cites long-dormant plans for a monument at the site. In response, local officials, preservationists, and historians are advocating for an alternative design. They propose building slender columns, which were originally envisioned by architects and lawmakers a century ago.
Disagreement on original vision
C. Andrew Lewis, an official in Washington’s historic preservation office, wrote a letter to the Trump administration. Lewis requested that the administration give "meaningful consideration" to an alternative that "more accurately reflects the spirit and intent of the 1924 McKim Mead & White design and the 1925 Act of Congress." The Washington Post reported that Lewis's letter was obtained by the newspaper. The digests from Newsmax and washingtonsun.com state that administration officials have cited a 1925 plan that authorized two pillars as justification for Trump's 250-foot arch.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated digests mention the cost estimate for the proposed arch. The centre-rated digest does not mention the cost estimate. The right-rated digest does not mention the cost estimate.
Coverage settled. We checked this 19 times and stopped on 24 Sept 2026, 05:15. The figures above are what it finished at.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
9 rated outlets
- The Washington Post reported that President Donald Trump has pressed for a 250‑foot triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery. The Washington Post, Washingtonsun, The Daily Beast, The Independent, News & Record, St Louis Post‑Dispatch and Winston‑Salem Journal all noted that local officials, preservationists and historians are urging a smaller monument of slender columns. The agency‑related digests said the Federal Aviation Administration cleared the arch but required an eternal flame.
- The Washington Post full article reproduced a letter from C. Andrew Lewis, a historic preservation official, in which he asked the administration to consider the original 1924 design and the 1925 congressional act. None of the digests reproduced Lewis’s wording or the specific reference to the 1924 McKim Mead & White plan.
- Only The Daily Beast digest mentioned that the proposed arch would involve a high cost; the other left‑rated digests did not include any estimate of expense. No left outlet’s digest reported a detailed budget or projected financial impact beyond that brief reference.
Centre
86 rated outlets
- Centre-rated outlets reported that the Federal Aviation Administration has determined President Trump's proposed triumphal arch will not interfere with flights into Washington National Airport.
- Several reports noted the FAA's approval came with a condition: the arch would need an "eternal flame" on top to alert pilots.
- Some digests mentioned that veterans have sued to block the arch, arguing it would damage the historic sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.
Right
7 rated outlets
- The right-rated report from Newsmax focused on the DC official's message to the Trump administration. Its headline stated: "D.C. Official to Trump Admin: Scrap Arch, Build 1925 Columns." The digest noted that a preservation official urged the administration to scrap the planned 250-foot arch and build two slender columns envisioned in a 1925 congressional plan.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns?
- Of the 102 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 9% are rated left, 84% are rated centre, 7% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 104. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns left or right?
- The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 84% of the 102 rated outlets on it are rated centre — so far this is a story carried mostly by the centre. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
- Is the coverage of DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns biased?
- DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns is one event reported by 104 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns?
- 104 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What monument does Donald Trump want built?
- President Donald Trump wants a 250-foot-tall triumphal arch to be constructed near Arlington National Cemetery. He has insisted on this design, citing long-dormant plans for a monument at the site.
- What alternative is being proposed?
- Local officials, preservationists, and historians are proposing an alternative to build slender columns instead of the arch. This idea reflects original designs envisioned by architects and lawmakers a century ago.
- Who is advocating for the alternative design?
- C. Andrew Lewis, an official in Washington's historic preservation office, wrote a letter to the Trump administration. He requested that the administration consider an alternative that more accurately reflects the spirit and intent of the original 1924 design and the 1925 Act of Congress.
Read it at the source
104 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
9- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Winston-Salem Journal in a new tab)
Winston-Salem Journal — is Winston-Salem Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens News & Record in a new tab)
News & Record — is News & Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens St Louis Post-Dispatch in a new tab)
St Louis Post-Dispatch — is St Louis Post-Dispatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump’s triumphal arch approved by FAA with one big adjustment (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump’s triumphal arch approved by FAA with one big adjustment (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- DC Officials Propose Columns Instead Of Trump’s Arch (opens Joe.My.God. in a new tab)
Joe.My.God. — is Joe.My.God. biased? Our profile of this outlet
- D.C. Preservation Official Says Trump Needs to Scrap His Arch for a Smaller Monument (opens washingtonsun.com in a new tab)
washingtonsun.com — is washingtonsun.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Build columns, not Trump’s arch, D.C. official tells administration (opens The Washington Post in a new tab)
The Washington Post — is The Washington Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
86- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WJCL in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens MOR-TV in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens KHBS in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens KSBW in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WXII in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WGAL in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WPBF in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WAPT in a new tab)
Show 78 more
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens KOAT in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WVTM in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WMTW in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WBAL-TV in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WPTZ in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens KMBC in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens KETV in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WISN in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens KCCI in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WTAE in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WDSU in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WYFF in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WESH in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens Koco News5 in a new tab)
Koco News5 — is Koco News5 biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WLKY in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WMUR in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WLWT in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens WCVB in a new tab)
- FAA says President Trump’s 250-foot arch won’t interfere with flights (opens KCRA 3 in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens MYSTATELINE in a new tab)
MYSTATELINE — is MYSTATELINE biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens WQOW in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens LiveNOW from FOX in a new tab)
LiveNOW from FOX — is LiveNOW from FOX biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens WNYW in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens KTBC in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens WTXF in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens KRIV in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens WJBK in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens Fox5 DC in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens KDFW in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens Fox 9 in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens WOFL in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens Fox 10 Phoenix in a new tab)
Fox 10 Phoenix — is Fox 10 Phoenix biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens Fox 6 now in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens WFLD in a new tab)
- FAA approves Trump's triumphal arch, requires 'eternal flame' on top (opens WAGA in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens WCBD in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens WOWK in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens WDHN in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens KXRM in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens KTSM in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens louisianafirstnews.com in a new tab)
louisianafirstnews.com — is louisianafirstnews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens WHNT 19 News in a new tab)
WHNT 19 News — is WHNT 19 News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens Fox8 in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens Fox8 in a new tab)
Fox8
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens PHL17 in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require 'eternal flame' on top to alert pilots (opens WGN 9 in a new tab)
- FAA says proposed Trump arch will require ‘eternal flame’ on top to alert pilots (opens The Hill in a new tab)
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens The Press of Atlantic City in a new tab)
The Press of Atlantic City — is The Press of Atlantic City biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Star-Herald in a new tab)
Star-Herald — is Star-Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Lincoln Journal Star in a new tab)
Lincoln Journal Star — is Lincoln Journal Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Tulsa World in a new tab)
Tulsa World — is Tulsa World biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Beatrice Daily Sun in a new tab)
Beatrice Daily Sun — is Beatrice Daily Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens The Billings Gazette in a new tab)
The Billings Gazette — is The Billings Gazette biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Dispatch Argus in a new tab)
Dispatch Argus — is Dispatch Argus biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Corvallis Gazette Times in a new tab)
Corvallis Gazette Times — is Corvallis Gazette Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Missoulian in a new tab)
Missoulian — is Missoulian biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens fredericksburg.com in a new tab)
fredericksburg.com — is fredericksburg.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens Montana Standard in a new tab)
Montana Standard — is Montana Standard biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Proposed arch clears federal agency hurdle (opens The Times of Northwest Indiana in a new tab)
- FAA Approves Trump's Bow and Claims It Will Not Interfere with Flights (opens KEZI 9 News in a new tab)
KEZI 9 News — is KEZI 9 News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA Approves Trump's Bow and Claims It Will Not Interfere with Flights (opens WXOW in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KESQ in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KEYT in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KRDO in a new tab)
- FAA clears proposed Trump arch, requires 'eternal flame' to alert pilots (opens Jerusalem Post in a new tab)
Jerusalem Post — is Jerusalem Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens kioncentralcoast.com in a new tab)
kioncentralcoast.com — is kioncentralcoast.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KDRV in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KTVZ in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens Local 3 News in a new tab)
Local 3 News — is Local 3 News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KTEN in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KMIZ in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens KVIA in a new tab)
- FAA says Trump’s arch would not interfere with airplanes flying into DC’s national airport (opens KIFI in a new tab)
- FAA gives approval for Trump’s arch, says it won’t interfere with flights (opens WKOW in a new tab)
- FAA clears proposed Trump arch, requires ‘eternal flame’ to alert pilots (opens WTVB in a new tab)
- FAA says Trump arch will not interfere with D.C. airport flight path (opens CBS News in a new tab)
- D.C. Official Says Trump Arch Should Be Scaled Back (opens Political Wire in a new tab)
Political Wire — is Political Wire biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FAA clears proposed Trump arch, requires 'eternal flame' to alert ... (opens Reuters in a new tab)
Right
7- Lawyer says 250-foot Trump arch disrupts historic sightlines cherished by veterans seeking burial at Arlington - NEW YORK TIMES POST (opens nytimespost.com in a new tab)
nytimespost.com — is nytimespost.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- The FAA Gives Trump’s Bow Green Light in Washington, but Demands an “Eternal Call” to Alert Pilots (opens voz.us in a new tab)
- FAA advances Triumphal Arch after safety hazard review on planes (opens Washington Examiner in a new tab)
Washington Examiner — is Washington Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
- D.C. Official to Trump Admin: Scrap Arch, Build 1925 Columns (opens Newsmax in a new tab)
- FAA Clears President Trump’s 250-Foot Washington Arch For DCA Flight Path (opens WLTReport in a new tab)
- FAA Clears President Trump’s 250-Foot Washington Arch For DCA Flight Path (opens 100% FED UP! in a new tab)
100% FED UP! — is 100% FED UP! biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Aviation authority green lights proposed Trump triumphal arch in Washington (opens Cyprus Mail in a new tab)
Cyprus Mail — is Cyprus Mail biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
2- Trump Will Turn the Arc of Triumph Into a Military Complex (opens El Economista in a new tab)
El Economista — is El Economista biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- The FAA Has Approved Trump's Plan to Build an Arc De Triomphe, Which Requires the Installation of a Perpetual Aviation Warning Light. (opens 大纪元 Epoch Times in a new tab)
大纪元 Epoch Times — is 大纪元 Epoch Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


