Skip to the story
All stories

DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns

A preservation official wrote to the Trump administration proposing slender columns instead of a 250-foot arch.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns

What this story says

  • President Donald Trump wants a 250-foot triumphal arch built near Arlington National Cemetery.
  • A DC preservation official, C. Andrew Lewis, has proposed building slender columns instead.
  • Lewis cited original designs from 1924 and a 1925 Act of Congress in a letter to the Trump administration.
  • The proposal suggests abandoning the arch for an alternative that reflects the original intent of the monument.

Who covered it

Left 9%(9)Centre 84%(86)Right 7%(7)

Percentages are shares of the 102 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 104 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

59/100

Hype

41/100

104 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 7 of the 102 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

President Donald Trump has advocated for the construction of a 250-foot-tall triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery. This proposal cites long-dormant plans for a monument at the site. In response, local officials, preservationists, and historians are advocating for an alternative design. They propose building slender columns, which were originally envisioned by architects and lawmakers a century ago.

Disagreement on original vision

C. Andrew Lewis, an official in Washington’s historic preservation office, wrote a letter to the Trump administration. Lewis requested that the administration give "meaningful consideration" to an alternative that "more accurately reflects the spirit and intent of the 1924 McKim Mead & White design and the 1925 Act of Congress." The Washington Post reported that Lewis's letter was obtained by the newspaper. The digests from Newsmax and washingtonsun.com state that administration officials have cited a 1925 plan that authorized two pillars as justification for Trump's 250-foot arch.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the cost estimate for the proposed arch. The centre-rated digest does not mention the cost estimate. The right-rated digest does not mention the cost estimate.

Coverage settled. We checked this 19 times and stopped on 24 Sept 2026, 05:15. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

9 rated outlets

  • The Washington Post reported that President Donald Trump has pressed for a 250‑foot triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery. The Washington Post, Washingtonsun, The Daily Beast, The Independent, News & Record, St Louis Post‑Dispatch and Winston‑Salem Journal all noted that local officials, preservationists and historians are urging a smaller monument of slender columns. The agency‑related digests said the Federal Aviation Administration cleared the arch but required an eternal flame.
  • The Washington Post full article reproduced a letter from C. Andrew Lewis, a historic preservation official, in which he asked the administration to consider the original 1924 design and the 1925 congressional act. None of the digests reproduced Lewis’s wording or the specific reference to the 1924 McKim Mead & White plan.
  • Only The Daily Beast digest mentioned that the proposed arch would involve a high cost; the other left‑rated digests did not include any estimate of expense. No left outlet’s digest reported a detailed budget or projected financial impact beyond that brief reference.

Centre

86 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated outlets reported that the Federal Aviation Administration has determined President Trump's proposed triumphal arch will not interfere with flights into Washington National Airport.
  • Several reports noted the FAA's approval came with a condition: the arch would need an "eternal flame" on top to alert pilots.
  • Some digests mentioned that veterans have sued to block the arch, arguing it would damage the historic sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.

Right

7 rated outlets

  • The right-rated report from Newsmax focused on the DC official's message to the Trump administration. Its headline stated: "D.C. Official to Trump Admin: Scrap Arch, Build 1925 Columns." The digest noted that a preservation official urged the administration to scrap the planned 250-foot arch and build two slender columns envisioned in a 1925 congressional plan.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns?
Of the 102 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 9% are rated left, 84% are rated centre, 7% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 104. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 84% of the 102 rated outlets on it are rated centre — so far this is a story carried mostly by the centre. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
Is the coverage of DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns biased?
DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns is one event reported by 104 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered DC official urges Trump to scrap arch for columns?
104 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What monument does Donald Trump want built?
President Donald Trump wants a 250-foot-tall triumphal arch to be constructed near Arlington National Cemetery. He has insisted on this design, citing long-dormant plans for a monument at the site.
What alternative is being proposed?
Local officials, preservationists, and historians are proposing an alternative to build slender columns instead of the arch. This idea reflects original designs envisioned by architects and lawmakers a century ago.
Who is advocating for the alternative design?
C. Andrew Lewis, an official in Washington's historic preservation office, wrote a letter to the Trump administration. He requested that the administration consider an alternative that more accurately reflects the spirit and intent of the original 1924 design and the 1925 Act of Congress.

Read it at the source

104 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

9
Show 1 more

Centre

86
Show 78 more

Right

7

Not rated

2

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Trump Arch Plan Alternatives | MediaBias News