Is Tulsa World biased?
The bias data this site ingests places Tulsa World in the centre. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. We have seen it on 3 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Tulsa World biased?
The bias data this site ingests places Tulsa World in the centre. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Tulsa World left or right?
The bias data this site ingests places Tulsa World in the centre. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Tulsa World reliable?
The factuality data this site ingests describes Tulsa World as high factuality. It reaches us without a named assessor, so it is an unattributed rating rather than our verdict. It does not guarantee that every report is correct.
Who says so
The lean above is carried in the coverage data this site ingests, which names no rater for it. We publish it because it is what the rest of the site groups Tulsa World on, and we will not present it as an assessment by anyone in particular until we hold one.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
The rating above reaches us without a named assessor, and is published as that rather than as anyone’s verdict.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Tulsa World.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, United States
- Seen publishing on
- tulsaworld.com
- Access
- Paywalled
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 3
- Reports listed
- 3
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 5 August 2026
3 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Tulsa World is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 3 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Tulsa World: its report arrived a median of 24 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 6 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 6 August 2026.
Stories we have seen it on
- Tulsa WorldCentreHigh factualityDow closes at record on Mideast optimism; SpaceX, AMD drag Nasdaq (opens Tulsa World in a new tab)
Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, United States
Our report: US stocks hit record highs as Strait of Hormuz talks progress
- Tulsa WorldCentreHigh factualityCourt: EPA can't cancel grants for clean energy (opens Tulsa World in a new tab)
Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, United States
Our report: US appeals court rules Trump administration wrongly ended $20bn climate fund
- Tulsa WorldCentreHigh factualityBlanche rescinds 'weaponization' fund (opens Tulsa World in a new tab)
Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, United States
Our report: Senate panel to advance Todd Blanche nomination after Republican deal
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Tulsa World, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.