Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics202 outlets ran this3 min read

Trump administration appeals ruling blocking mail voting order

The White House seeks to reinstate an executive order that could allow the Postal Service to reject mail ballots.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Election workers sort vote-by-mail ballots at the Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections Office for the Florida primary election in Doral, Fla., Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)

What this story says

  • The Trump administration is appealing a judge's ruling that blocked an executive order concerning mail voting.
  • The executive order could allow the U.S. Postal Service to refuse mail ballots from states that do not provide lists of eligible voters or use a uniform envelope style.
  • U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani found states lack sufficient time and money to comply with the directives before the midterm elections.
  • The first mail ballots for the general election are scheduled to be sent out on September 4.

Who covered it

Left 42%(77)Centre 48%(88)Right 10%(18)

Percentages are shares of the 183 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 19 of the 202 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

77/100

Hype

20/100

202 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 18 of the 183 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

The Trump administration has appealed a federal judge's ruling that temporarily blocked an executive order aimed at limiting mail voting before the midterm elections. The appeal comes days before the first mail ballots are due to be sent out for the general election.

The executive order, issued by President Donald Trump, could permit the U.S. Postal Service to refuse delivery of ballots from states that do not submit lists of eligible voters or adhere to a uniform envelope style. The White House has described these as "commonsense measures" to protect ballot security, calling the judge's order blocking it "unreasoned and unlawful."

Disagreement on compliance timeline

U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani ruled that states do not have adequate time or financial resources to redesign ballots, update systems, and train officials to upload voter data to the Postal Service before the midterm elections. The first mail ballots for the general election are scheduled to be sent out on September 4.

What the coverage left out

No right-rated outlet ran this story. The digests provided do not mention the specific legal arguments made by the plaintiffs challenging the executive order, nor do they detail the Supreme Court's previous involvement in allowing the plan to move forward on procedural grounds.

Tags:#MailVoting#TrumpAdministration#MidtermElections#USPS#ElectionLaw

Coverage settled. We checked this 41 times and stopped on 3 Sept 2026, 16:15. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

77 rated outlets

  • All twelve left‑rated outlets listed the story under the headline “Trump administration appeals latest ruling blocking his mail voting order from taking effect.” The Associated Press supplied a full report; the remaining eleven outlets reproduced a one‑paragraph digest of that AP story.
  • The AP report said the administration filed an appeal after a Boston federal judge blocked the executive order that would let the Postal Service refuse ballots from states lacking voter‑list submissions and a uniform envelope. It noted the Supreme Court had earlier allowed the plan on procedural grounds, the 1st Circuit will review the case, and the White House called the measures “commonsense” and the block “unreasoned and unlawful.”
  • The eleven digests each led on the appeal and the judge’s blocking, echoing the AP lead sentence. Two digests added “key November elections,” and one described the action as a USPS appeal to halt ballot curbs. The three NBC digests only presented a photo caption of ballot‑sorting in Florida and omitted any reference to the appeal, the White House comment, the judge’s reasoning, or the Brookings fraud statistic.

Centre

88 rated outlets

  • Seven centre-rated outlets reported that the Trump administration is appealing a judge's ruling that blocked limitations on mail voting before the midterm elections. These reports noted the executive order could allow the U.S. Postal Service to refuse delivery of ballots from states that do not submit lists of eligible voters and follow a uniform envelope style. They also stated that U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani found states do not have the time or money to comply with the directives before the elections. The first mail ballots are scheduled to be sent out September 4. Several reports mentioned that the president has targeted mail voting, which he blames for his 2020 election loss, even though he uses it himself. The Brookings Institution report on mail voting fraud was also mentioned.

Right

18 rated outlets

  • All six right‑rated digests report that the Trump administration filed an appeal after a federal judge blocked a new U.S. Postal Service rule on mail‑in voting. They note the Justice Department submitted the appeal, reference a temporary two‑week or 14‑day block, and in at least one case name Judge Indira Talwani.
  • The Boston Herald digest adds that the Supreme Court permitted the administration to continue work on the plan while declining to rule on its legality. The MY Northwest digest situates the appeal days before states begin mailing ballots for the midterm election, and the Washington Examiner digest specifies that the appeal was directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
  • None of the right‑rated digests include a cost estimate for the rule, statements from postal officials, reactions from election‑security groups, or analysis of potential voter impact. They also do not quote any individual beyond the judge’s name, and they omit any discussion of the broader legal context beyond the immediate appeal.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump administration appeals ruling blocking mail voting order?
Of the 183 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 42% are rated left, 48% are rated centre, 10% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 202. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Trump administration appeals ruling blocking mail voting order left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 183 rated outlets on this story, 42% are rated left, 48% are rated centre, 10% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Trump administration appeals ruling blocking mail voting order biased?
Trump administration appeals ruling blocking mail voting order is one event reported by 202 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Trump administration appeals ruling blocking mail voting order?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Trump administration appeals ruling blocking mail voting order?
202 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the Trump administration appealing?
The Trump administration is appealing a judge's ruling that blocked an executive order concerning mail voting. This order could allow the U.S. Postal Service to refuse mail ballots from states that do not submit lists of eligible voters or follow a uniform envelope style.
Why did the judge block the order?
U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani found that states do not have sufficient time or money to comply with the new directives before the midterm elections. The first mail ballots are scheduled to be sent out on September 4.
What is the history of this executive order?
The executive order was challenged in court after its issuance in March. While the Supreme Court previously allowed the plan to proceed on procedural grounds, a federal judge blocked its implementation for the midterm elections, leading to the current appeal.

Read it at the source

202 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

77
Show 69 more

Centre

88
Show 80 more

Right

18
Show 10 more

Not rated

19
Show 11 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
President Trump3 min readTrump announces submarine repair center for Cleveland, OhioRead storyTrump administration aired ads after judge ordered them stopped2 min readTrump administration aired ads after judge ordered them stoppedRead storyTrump's tariffs linked to factory job losses, potential midterm backlash3 min readTrump's tariffs linked to factory job losses, potential midterm backlashRead story
Trump Appeals Mail Voting Ruling | MediaBias News