Skip to the story
All stories

Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Order After SCOTUS Ruling

A new lawsuit has been filed by 26 states challenging USPS regulations on mail-in ballots.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Department of Elections workers sort mail-in ballots for the California primary election at City Hall on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, in San Francisco.

What this story says

  • U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani lifted a nationwide block on President Trump's mail-in voting executive order.
  • The Supreme Court ruled that a lower court could not block the order because new USPS regulations were not finalized when states sued.
  • A new lawsuit has been filed by Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, joined by 25 other states, against the USPS over the rule.
  • The new lawsuit argues the USPS rule interferes with states' election authority and risks disenfranchising voters.

Who covered it

Left 15%(5)Centre 41%(14)Right 44%(15)

Percentages are shares of the 34 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 22 of the 56 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

50/100

Hype

45/100

56 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 5 of the 34 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani has lifted a nationwide injunction that had prevented the implementation of President Trump's executive order concerning mail-in voting. The Supreme Court had previously ruled that a lower court lacked the authority to block the order because new U.S. Postal Service (USPS) regulations had not been finalized at the time states initiated their lawsuit.

The Supreme Court's decision stated that the states' challenge was premature. However, following the finalization of the USPS rule, Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, along with 25 other states, have filed a new lawsuit. This legal action contends that the new USPS rule infringes upon states' authority to manage their own elections and could lead to voter disenfranchisement.

Disagreement on the timing of the USPS rule

Fox 17 reported that the USPS published the rule requiring mail-in ballots to have a unique logo and barcodes with an embedded ZIP code in the Federal Register on Wednesday. Hot Air stated that the Supreme Court's decision was based on the fact that the USPS had not yet implemented its part of the new regulation when the states challenged the order.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated reports below mention the specific details of the new USPS rule beyond the requirement for a unique logo and barcodes with an embedded ZIP code. The new lawsuit filed by Washington and 25 other states, which argues the rule interferes with states’ authority to administer elections and risks disenfranchising voters, is mentioned by Fox 17. However, the specific arguments and potential harms detailed in that lawsuit are not elaborated upon in the other right-rated digests.

Coverage settled. We checked this 61 times and stopped on 1 Sept 2026, 19:30. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

AP Photo/David Zalubowski
Hot AirRight

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • The left-leaning outlets reported that a federal judge lifted an injunction on an executive order concerning mail-in voting. This action followed a Supreme Court ruling that had dismissed a previous challenge. The judge cited the Supreme Court's decision in her reasoning for lifting the block.
  • Multiple outlets noted that voting rights groups and Democratic-led states immediately filed new lawsuits. These challenges targeted a related rule from the US Postal Service that had recently been finalized. The new legal actions sought to block this USPS rule.
  • Common Dreams, which published a full report, stated that the executive order restricted participation in elections. It quoted the League of Women Voters and the ACLU, who argued the USPS rule was unconstitutional and would disenfranchise voters. Other outlets presented digests of these developments.

Centre

14 rated outlets

  • All twelve centre outlets published a piece on the lawsuit. WKMG, Winnipeg Free Press, KVIA, CBS News, The Hill, Newsweek, Washington Top News, UPI, Chicago Tribune, Portland Press Herald, WPLG and KCRA 3 each led on Democratic‑controlled states filing a suit against President Donald Trump’s executive order that would limit mail‑in voting. Their digests noted that roughly two dozen states and the District of Columbia are challenging the Postal Service rule.
  • WKMG’s full report added that the filing came two days after the Supreme Court’s decision in a separate case, and quoted New York Attorney General Letitia James saying the federal action threatens Americans’ right to vote. It also referenced Judge Indira Talwani’s earlier injunction and described the Postal Service rule requiring federal approval of ballot‑envelope designs and a voter list.
  • None of the digests from Winnipeg Free Press, KVIA, CBS News, The Hill, Newsweek, Washington Top News, UPI, Chicago Tribune, Portland Press Herald, WPLG or KCRA 3 mentioned Letitia James’s statement, the Supreme Court timing, Judge Talwani’s background or the specific envelope‑design requirement. Only WKMG provided those details, indicating that the centre‑rated digests omitted the broader legal and procedural context.

Right

15 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports focused on the lifting of the injunction and the Supreme Court's role in the decision. Fox 17 noted that U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama appointee, granted the Justice Department's request to drop her earlier injunction. The outlet also reported that Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, joined by 25 other states, filed a new lawsuit against the USPS. Hot Air described the new mail-in ballot procedure as a "common sense solution" and questioned why anyone would oppose it unless their intention was to cheat. The Post Millennial referred to the judge as a "leftist Boston judge forced to lift ruling blocking USPS from securing elections after SCOTUS ruling."

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Order After SCOTUS Ruling?
Of the 34 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 15% are rated left, 41% are rated centre, 44% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 56. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Order After SCOTUS Ruling left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 34 rated outlets on this story, 15% are rated left, 41% are rated centre, 44% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Order After SCOTUS Ruling biased?
Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Order After SCOTUS Ruling is one event reported by 56 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Order After SCOTUS Ruling?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Judge Lifts Block on Trump Mail-In Voting Order After SCOTUS Ruling?
56 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What was the federal judge's decision regarding Trump's mail-in voting order?
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani lifted a nationwide block on President Trump's executive order concerning mail-in voting. This action followed a Supreme Court ruling that a previous challenge to the order was premature because new U.S. Postal Service regulations had not yet been finalized.
Why did the Supreme Court rule on the mail-in voting order?
The Supreme Court ruled that a lower court had no authority to block Trump's executive order because the new USPS regulations were not yet finalized when states initially sued. The court found the states' challenge to be premature.
What is the new lawsuit about?
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, joined by 25 other states, have filed a new lawsuit against the USPS over its mail-in ballot rule. They argue the rule interferes with states' authority to administer elections and risks disenfranchising voters.

Read it at the source

410 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

106
Show 98 more

Centre

153
Show 145 more

Right

61
Show 53 more

Not rated

90
Show 82 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Trump Mail-In Voting Order | MediaBias News