Is http://www.wfxg.com biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places http://www.wfxg.com in the centre. We have seen it on 3 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is http://www.wfxg.com biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places http://www.wfxg.com in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is http://www.wfxg.com left or right?
Media Bias/Fact Check places http://www.wfxg.com in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is http://www.wfxg.com reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for http://www.wfxg.com are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Media Bias/Fact CheckcenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for http://www.wfxg.com.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- United States
- Official site
- wfxg.com
- Seen publishing on
- wfxg.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 3
- Reports listed
- 3
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
3 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. http://www.wfxg.com is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 3 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, we logged no report earlier than http://www.wfxg.com’s on 1 of them. Overall it filed a median of 5 hours after the earliest report we logged.
Measured 6 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 6 August 2026. Ratings pulled 6 August 2026.
Stories we have seen it on
- http://www.wfxg.comCentreHigh factualityHottest Augusts in Georgia since 1895 (opens http://www.wfxg.com in a new tab)
Our report: Missouri records hottest August in 1936 as Stacker ranks state heat since 1895
- http://www.wfxg.comCentreHigh factualityGun laws to be tested at U.S. Supreme Court (opens http://www.wfxg.com in a new tab)
Our report: US Supreme Court to revisit gun law precedent in upcoming term
- http://www.wfxg.comCentreHigh factualityBill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens http://www.wfxg.com in a new tab)
Our report: Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social media posts
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as http://www.wfxg.com, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.