EU states provisionally agree to lift sanctions on two Russian oligarchs
Agreement reached as part of a compromise to extend sanctions against Russia for three years.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Ališeras Usmanovas
Photograph: Lietuvos Radijas ir Televizija (embedded from source)
What this story says
- EU member states have reached a provisional agreement to lift sanctions on Russian oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman.
- This agreement is part of a compromise to extend sanctions against Russia for three years.
- Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha stated that lifting sanctions on these oligarchs is unacceptable and would send the wrong message to Moscow.
- France and Slovakia advocated for Usmanov's removal, while Luxembourg requested Fridman's removal.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 7 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 15 of the 22 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
57/100
Hype
41/100
22 sources · methodology
EU member states have reached a provisional agreement to lift sanctions on Russian oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman. This decision is part of a compromise to extend sanctions against Russia for three years, a significantly longer period than the usual six or 12 months. The agreement will become final if no member state formally objects within hours.
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha has stated that lifting sanctions on these individuals is unacceptable and would send the wrong message to Moscow. He argued that pressure on Russia should be increased, not eased. Usmanov and Fridman were added to the sanctions list in 2022 due to their alleged ties to the Russian regime and their alleged contribution to the war in Ukraine.
Disagreements on reasons for removal
Reports indicate that France and Slovakia advocated for Usmanov's removal from the sanctions list. Index.hr reported that France's advocacy followed pressure from Azerbaijan, which had detained French citizens, though a high-ranking Azerbaijani diplomat denied these claims. Lietuvos Radijas ir Televizija stated that Paris cited "national security" reasons for its request but did not provide public details. Luxembourg requested Fridman's removal, with Lietuvos Radijas ir Televizija reporting this was after Fridman initiated a €15 billion lawsuit against the EU over the sanctions.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated reports mention the specific details regarding France's alleged pressure from Azerbaijan or Luxembourg's argument that Fridman's case might be weakened if only Usmanov were removed, as reported by Index.hr and Lietuvos Radijas ir Televizija.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 21 Sept 2026, 18:00, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
1 rated outlet
- Index.hr's full report stated that EU representatives agreed to lift sanctions on Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman, provided no member state objected. The report noted this was a surprising decision and highlighted Ukraine's reaction, quoting Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha saying it was unacceptable and would send the wrong signal. The outlet also mentioned France's and Slovakia's advocacy for Usmanov's removal and Luxembourg's request for Fridman's. It noted France's stated reason for advocating Usmanov's removal was pressure from Azerbaijan, a claim denied by an Azerbaijani diplomat.
Centre
1 rated outlet
- Lietuvos Radijas ir Televizija reported that EU countries reached a preliminary agreement to lift sanctions on Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman, initiated by France. This agreement is part of a compromise to extend sanctions against Russia for three years. The report quoted Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha calling the move unacceptable and a wrong signal to Moscow. It detailed France and Slovakia's push for Usmanov's removal and Luxembourg's subsequent request for Fridman's removal, citing national security for France and a lawsuit for Luxembourg. The report also mentioned opposition from stricter EU countries like Poland and the Baltic states.
Right
5 rated outlets
- The right-rated reports focused on Ukraine's strong opposition to the potential lifting of EU sanctions on Russian oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman. Iefimerida.gr, Arab News, and Korrespondent.net all highlighted Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sibikha's statement that the move is unacceptable and would send a "wrong message" to Moscow. Arab News noted that the issue has stalled due to differing views among EU countries. Korrespondent.net stated Sibiga's position that sanctions need to be tightened and individual lists expanded. Iefimerida.gr mentioned that the two oligarchs were added to the list due to their ties to the Russian regime.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover EU states provisionally agree to lift sanctions on two Russian oligarchs?
- Of the 7 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 14% are rated left, 15% are rated centre, 71% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 22. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is EU states provisionally agree to lift sanctions on two Russian oligarchs left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 7 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of EU states provisionally agree to lift sanctions on two Russian oligarchs biased?
- EU states provisionally agree to lift sanctions on two Russian oligarchs is one event reported by 22 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which outlets covered EU states provisionally agree to lift sanctions on two Russian oligarchs?
- 22 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is the provisional agreement reached by EU member states?
- EU member states have provisionally agreed to lift sanctions on Russian oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman. This agreement is part of a compromise to extend sanctions against Russia for three years, a longer period than usual, and will become final if no member state objects.
- What is Ukraine's reaction to the potential lifting of sanctions?
- Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha has called the move unacceptable, stating it would send the wrong message to Moscow. He argued that pressure on Russia should be increased, not eased, and that the oligarchs were sanctioned for their ties to the Russian regime and contribution to the war.
- Which EU countries advocated for the removal of these oligarchs?
- France and Slovakia advocated for the removal of Alisher Usmanov from the sanctions list. Luxembourg subsequently requested the removal of Mikhail Fridman. Reports suggest France cited national security reasons, while Luxembourg's request may be linked to a lawsuit initiated by Fridman.
Read it at the source
22 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
1Centre
1Right
5- Ukraine: Possible Lifting of EU Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs Unacceptable - iefimerida.gr (opens Iefimerida in a new tab)
Iefimerida — is Iefimerida biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ukraine slams ‘unacceptable’ push to lift EU sanctions on Russian oligarchs (opens Al Arabiya in a new tab)
Al Arabiya — is Al Arabiya biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ukraine slams unacceptable push to lift EU sanctions on Russian oligarchs (opens anews.com.tr in a new tab)
anews.com.tr — is anews.com.tr biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ukraine slams ‘unacceptable’ push to lift EU sanctions on Russian oligarchs (opens Arab News in a new tab)
- Ukraine Expressed Its Position on Usmanov and Friedman (opens Korrespondent.net in a new tab)
Korrespondent.net — is Korrespondent.net biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
15- Removal of Russian Oligarchs From EU Sanctions List Unacceptable for Kiev (opens dialogos.com.cy in a new tab)
dialogos.com.cy — is dialogos.com.cy biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ukraine Considers "Unacceptable" Lifting of Sanctions Against Russian Oligarchs (opens e-global.pt in a new tab)
e-global.pt — is e-global.pt biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Big Surprise: Europe's Gift to Putin's Oligarch (opens siol.net in a new tab)
siol.net — is siol.net biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Lifting Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs "Unacceptable", Says Ukraine (opens seleo.gr in a new tab)
- EU Lifts Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs - Ukraine Says "Unacceptable" (opens CNN Greece in a new tab)
CNN Greece — is CNN Greece biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Kiev Tells Brussels that Lifting Sanctions Against Russian Oligarchs Is Unacceptable (opens Correio da Manhã in a new tab)
Correio da Manhã — is Correio da Manhã biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Revolt in Kiev After France Called for the Removal of Russian Oligarchs Usmanov and Fridman From the EU Sanctions List: "It Is Unacceptable" (opens antena3.ro in a new tab)
antena3.ro — is antena3.ro biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Lifting Sanctions Against Russian Oligarchs Would Be "Unacceptable" (opens RadioMaryja.pl in a new tab)
RadioMaryja.pl — is RadioMaryja.pl biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 7 more
- Ukraine vs. EU: Lifting Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs "Unacceptable" (opens Naftemporiki in a new tab)
Naftemporiki — is Naftemporiki biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ukraine: "Lifting Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs Is Unacceptable" (opens reader.gr in a new tab)
reader.gr — is reader.gr biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Kyiv Tells Brussels that Lifting Sanctions Against Oligarchs Is "Unacceptable" (opens Noticias ao Minuto in a new tab)
Noticias ao Minuto — is Noticias ao Minuto biased? Our profile of this outlet
- RAINEWS * ECONOMY AND FINANCE: "THE RUSSIA LOST THE CONTROL OF HIS GASOLIO INDUSTRY IN CASE OF WAR" - Journalistic Agency Opinion. News From Italy - World / Trentino Alto Adige (opens Agenzia giornalistica Opinione in a new tab)
- Andriy Sibikha: Lifting Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs "Unacceptable" (opens ΑΘΗΝΑ 9,84 in a new tab)
ΑΘΗΝΑ 9,84 — is ΑΘΗΝΑ 9,84 biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Ukraine: EU Lifting Sanctions on Russian Oligarchs "Unacceptable" (opens Business Daily in a new tab)
Business Daily — is Business Daily biased? Our profile of this outlet
- No Concessions to Putin's Oligarchs: Ukrainian Foreign Ministry Demands to Strengthen Sanctions Pressure (opens ТСН.ua in a new tab)
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.




