Skip to the story
All stories

FBI files reveal Eric Swalwell's ties to suspected Chinese operative Fang Fang

Declassified documents show the FBI investigated illegal donations, interns and a sexual relationship between the former congressman and Fang.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
FBI: Fang Fang Sought Illegal Donations for Swalwell Campaign

What this story says

  • The FBI investigated Eric Swalwell from 2014 to 2017 over ties to suspected Chinese operative Fang Fang, codenamed 'Freshman Fifteen'.
  • Declassified memos show Fang solicited illegal straw donations from foreign nationals and placed interns in Swalwell’s office.
  • Swalwell admitted to a sexual relationship with Fang but denied knowledge of any scheme involving internships or donations.
  • The case was closed in 2017 without charges, citing national security reasons.

Who covered it

Left 7%(2)Centre 8%(2)Right 85%(23)

Percentages are shares of the 27 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 29 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

74/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

68/100

29 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 2 of the 27 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The FBI investigated former California congressman Eric Swalwell for three years over his ties to Fang Fang, a suspected Chinese intelligence operative. The probe, codenamed 'Freshman Fifteen', ran from May 2014 to May 2017 and examined allegations that Fang sought illegal campaign contributions and placed interns in Swalwell’s office in exchange for political access.

Declassified FBI memos, released by the White House on 17 August 2026, show the bureau developed evidence that Fang violated campaign finance laws by soliciting straw donations from foreign nationals. Swalwell’s campaign received £845,838 ($1,145,688) in individual contributions between January 2013 and December 2014, some of which the FBI suspected were routed through intermediaries to conceal their origin.

Swalwell admitted to FBI agents that he had a sexual relationship with Fang, including at least two encounters at his apartment. He told investigators he viewed Fang as his primary contact with the Asian Pacific Islander American Public Affairs association and was unaware of any scheme involving internships or donations. The FBI did not find evidence that Swalwell knowingly participated in the alleged arrangement.

The investigation was shelved in 2017 after consultations with the FBI’s San Francisco Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California. Officials cited 'national security reasons' for not pursuing charges. Fang left the U.S. and was barred from re-entry.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mentioned the FBI’s determination that no evidence was established proving Swalwell knowingly participated in the alleged exchange of internships for donations. Neither of the centre-rated reports carried the detail that Fang was barred from re-entering the U.S.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 17 Aug 2026, 23:15, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

A newly declassified White House release reveals that a suspected Chinese intelligence operative potentially compromised former congressman Eric Swalwell with campaign cash and interns By United States Congress - https://swalwell.house.gov/media-center/social-media
IBTimes UKLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

2 rated outlets

  • The two left-rated reports led on the FBI’s findings of illegal donations and the sexual relationship between Swalwell and Fang. IBTimes UK’s full report described Fang as having 'potentially compromised' Swalwell with 'sex, foreign interns and illicit campaign cash'. It noted that Swalwell relinquished his congressional seat and abandoned a gubernatorial bid amid unrelated allegations of sexual misconduct.
  • SFist’s digest carried the detail that Swalwell claimed one encounter with Fang occurred while he was on Ambien. Both reports included the FBI’s conclusion that Swalwell was not found to have knowingly participated in the alleged scheme.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • Internewscast’s full report led on the FBI’s shelving of the case for national security reasons. It quoted the declassified memo stating that Fang ‘left the United States in [redacted] and has been barred from re-entry’. The report included Swalwell’s admission to FBI agents that he had ‘hooked up’ with Fang at least twice, including once after taking Ambien.
  • Political Wire’s digest highlighted Swalwell’s confession to a ‘drug-fueled sex romp’ with Fang, quoting the New York Post’s phrasing. Both centre-rated reports carried the FBI’s finding that no evidence was established proving an exchange of internships for donations.

Right

23 rated outlets

  • The 22 right-rated digests led on the FBI’s evidence of illegal donations and the sexual relationship. Fox News, The Epoch Times, and The Gateway Pundit all carried the detail that Swalwell admitted to having sex with Fang. The New York Post’s digest stated the FBI ‘stumbled on’ the affair while trying to recruit Fang as a double agent.
  • Several right-rated digests, including those from The Federalist, TrendingPolitics, and The Western Journal, emphasised the FBI’s finding that Fang secured ‘conduit campaign contributions’ for Swalwell. The Epoch Times and WLTReport carried the detail that Fang placed interns in Swalwell’s office. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the FBI’s conclusion that Swalwell was not found to have knowingly participated in the scheme.

Read it at the source

29 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

2

Centre

2

Right

23
Show 15 more

Not rated

2

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover FBI files reveal Eric Swalwell's ties to suspected Chinese operative…?
Of the 27 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 7% are rated left, 8% are rated centre, 85% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 29. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is FBI files reveal Eric Swalwell's ties to suspected Chinese operative… left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 85% of the 27 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
Is the coverage of FBI files reveal Eric Swalwell's ties to suspected Chinese operative… biased?
FBI files reveal Eric Swalwell's ties to suspected Chinese operative Fang Fang is one event reported by 29 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting FBI files reveal Eric Swalwell's ties to suspected Chinese operative…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered FBI files reveal Eric Swalwell's ties to suspected Chinese operative…?
29 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What was the FBI investigation into Eric Swalwell about?
The FBI investigated Swalwell from 2014 to 2017 over ties to suspected Chinese operative Fang Fang. The probe examined allegations that Fang sought illegal campaign contributions and placed interns in his office in exchange for political access. The case was shelved in 2017 for national security reasons.
Did the FBI find evidence that Eric Swalwell knowingly participated in illegal activity?
The FBI did not establish evidence proving Swalwell knowingly participated in the alleged exchange of internships for donations. Declassified memos show the bureau developed evidence that Fang violated campaign finance laws, but Swalwell denied knowledge of any scheme involving interns or donations.
Why was the FBI investigation into Eric Swalwell closed?
The investigation was shelved in 2017 after consultations with the FBI’s San Francisco Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Officials cited 'national security reasons' for not pursuing charges against Swalwell or Fang. Fang left the U.S. and was barred from re-entry.
What did Eric Swalwell admit to in the FBI interviews?
Swalwell admitted to FBI agents that he had a sexual relationship with Fang, including at least two encounters at his apartment. He told investigators he viewed Fang as his primary contact with the Asian Pacific Islander American Public Affairs association and was unaware of any scheme involving internships or donations.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Eric Swalwell FBI files: left, centre and right coverage | MediaBias News