Skip to the story
All stories

Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties

Local governments review contracts after errors, misuse and damage to licence-plate readers

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties

What this story says

  • Flock Safety cameras, used by police to read licence plates, have been damaged in El Paso County, Colorado, and other areas.
  • Several counties are reviewing contracts after reports of privacy violations, including misidentified plates and unauthorised tracking by officers.
  • Flock is reducing data retention from 30 days to 7 and requiring stricter rules for law enforcement access.
  • Right-rated outlets linked opposition to the cameras to abortion activists; no left-rated outlet ran the story.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 52%(11)Right 48%(10)

Percentages are shares of the 21 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 24 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

62/100

Craft

58/100

Hype

41/100

24 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

None of the 21 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Flock Safety cameras, which read and store licence-plate data for law enforcement, have faced growing opposition across the US. Several counties are reviewing their contracts with the company after reports of privacy breaches, including misidentified plates and unauthorised use by police officers. KRDO reported that in one case, a zero was mistaken for the letter O, resulting in a wrongful ticket.

In El Paso County, Colorado, three Flock cameras operated by the sheriff’s department were damaged, along with four others used by the Fountain Police Department. KRDO also reported that a former police officer used the system to track his ex-girlfriend, sending her messages that included her location. Flock Safety told KRDO it is tightening regulations for law enforcement access and reducing the time licence-plate data is stored from 30 days to 7.

Mayors in Fargo and West Fargo, North Dakota, have acknowledged public concerns about the cameras. Inforum reported that West Fargo Mayor Eric Gjerdevig said the cameras are one of the most common issues residents raise with him, while Fargo Mayor Josh Boschee said he has privacy concerns but trusts local police.

What the coverage left out

No left-rated outlet ran the story. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the cost of the cameras, the number of counties reviewing contracts, or the specific cases of misidentified plates and unauthorised tracking reported by KRDO. The centre-rated reports did not address the link between opposition to the cameras and abortion activists.

Coverage settled. We checked this 13 times and stopped on 20 Aug 2026, 04:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left ran this story. We watched the coverage until it stopped changing, and none appeared.

Centre

11 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated outlets led on protests against Flock cameras in Fargo, North Dakota. Seven digests reported a demonstration that ended in fights among participants. The reports agree the protest aimed to raise concerns about police use of cameras that record licence plates and other information from the public.
  • KRDO’s report from Colorado Springs described specific incidents of misuse: a police officer tracking an ex-partner, and a misread licence plate leading to a wrongful fine. The outlet also noted physical damage to cameras in El Paso County and Fountain, and Flock’s response to reduce data retention from 30 days to seven.
  • Digests from Valley News Live and local mayors quoted privacy concerns over access to images, storage duration, and potential data misuse. None of the other centre-rated digests mentioned Flock’s policy changes or the scale of camera damage outside Fargo.

Right

10 rated outlets

  • All four right-rated digests linked opposition to Flock cameras to abortion activists. ussanews.com, LifeNews.com and The Daily Signal each carried identical wording: “Who are among those opposing Flock cameras? Abortion activists in...” The National Desk framed the story as a question to readers, asking whether they considered the cameras a threat to privacy. None of the digests mentioned the damage to cameras, the misidentified plates, or Flock’s changes to data retention rules.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties?
Of the 21 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 52% are rated centre, 48% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 24. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 21 rated outlets on this story, 0% are rated left, 52% are rated centre, 48% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties biased?
Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties is one event reported by 24 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Flock Cameras Face Privacy Backlash Across US Counties?
24 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What privacy concerns have been raised about Flock cameras?
Reports describe cases where Flock cameras misidentified licence plates, leading to wrongful tickets, and where police officers used the system to track individuals without authorisation. KRDO reported a former officer used it to monitor his ex-girlfriend. Several counties are reviewing contracts due to these privacy breaches.
How is Flock Safety responding to the backlash?
Flock Safety told KRDO it is tightening regulations for law enforcement access to its system and reducing the time licence-plate data is stored from 30 days to 7. The company did not specify what the new rules would require, but said they would apply before officers could search for suspects.
Which outlets linked opposition to Flock cameras to abortion activists?
Three right-rated outlets, ussanews.com, LifeNews.com and The Daily Signal, each carried identical wording linking opposition to the cameras to abortion activists. None of the centre-rated reports or the unrated letter to the editor mentioned this connection.

Read it at the source

28 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Centre

11
Show 3 more

Right

13
Show 5 more

Not rated

4

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Flock Safety US contracts reviewed | MediaBias News