ICE stops revealing locations of thousands of detainees

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover ICE stops revealing locations of thousands of detainees?

Of the 49 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 51% are rated left, 37% are rated centre, 12% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 53. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is ICE stops revealing locations of thousands of detainees left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 49 rated outlets on this story, 51% are rated left, 37% are rated centre, 12% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of ICE stops revealing locations of thousands of detainees biased?

ICE stops revealing locations of thousands of detainees is one event reported by 53 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting ICE stops revealing locations of thousands of detainees?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered ICE stops revealing locations of thousands of detainees?

53 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What has U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement changed regarding detainee locations?

ICE has stopped publicly revealing the locations of thousands of detainees who have final deportation orders. These individuals have been removed from the agency's online locator system, making it significantly harder for their lawyers and relatives to find them.

How many detainees are affected by this change?

Nearly 16,000 people who were arrested and booked into ICE detention in July were subject to final removal orders. This number represents more than a third of all bookings for that month, according to data obtained by the Deportation Data Project.

Are there any exceptions to this new policy?

Yes, the practice does not apply to detainees held at facilities in Adelanto, California, or at temporary holding facilities in Minneapolis, New York City, or suburban Chicago. Judges have ordered ICE to list detainees in these specific facilities in the online locator promptly.

What has ICE said about this change?

ICE did not publicize the move and, in a statement to the Associated Press, did not confirm or deny it. The agency stated that detainees with final removal orders were being prioritized for deportation.