Skip to the story
All stories

Investigative journalist sues California over new law

Nick Shirley argues Assembly Bill 2624 violates free speech and could hinder his reporting.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Investigative journalist sues California over new law

What this story says

  • Investigative journalist Nick Shirley is suing California over Assembly Bill 2624, which opponents call the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.'
  • Shirley claims the law infringes on his free speech rights and could limit his reporting on immigration-service organizations.
  • The lawsuit names California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber.
  • The law restricts the publication of identifying information about workers at organizations that provide immigration-related services.

Who covered it

Left 4%(1)Centre 9%(2)Right 87%(20)

Percentages are shares of the 23 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 5 of the 28 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

28 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 23 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Investigative journalist Nick Shirley has filed a lawsuit against the state of California, challenging Assembly Bill 2624. Critics have dubbed the law the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.' Shirley asserts that the legislation violates his free speech rights and could restrict his reporting on immigration-service organizations.

The lawsuit names California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber as defendants. Assembly Bill 2624 restricts the publication of certain identifying information about workers employed by organizations that offer immigration-related services.

Coverage

Omissions

None of the right-rated digests mention the specific individuals named in the lawsuit beyond Governor Gavin Newsom. The left-rated report did not mention the specific individuals named in the lawsuit beyond Governor Gavin Newsom.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 7 Sept 2026, 03:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • The left-rated report from Courthouse News Service led on the lawsuit filed by Nick Shirley over a law that shields information of immigration support workers. It noted that supporters of the journalist have referred to Assembly Bill 2624 as the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.'

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports from The Economic Times and Internewscast focused on investigative journalist Nick Shirley suing California over the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act' and its impact on free speech rights. The Economic Times noted the lawsuit launches a First Amendment fight with Governor Gavin Newsom's administration. Internewscast highlighted that critics have begun calling the bill the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.'

Right

20 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports from 20 outlets, including Zero Hedge, The Epoch Times, and Times of India, highlighted Nick Shirley's lawsuit against California over the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.' Many framed the law as an effort to muzzle journalists or restrict free speech. For example, RedState described the law as a 'Soviet-style effort to muzzle journalists,' and PJ Media stated Shirley is preparing for 'war against California.' Several reports, such as those from The Daily Signal and Tennessee Star, mentioned that the bill restricts the publication of certain identifying information about workers at organizations that provide immigration-related services.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Investigative journalist sues California over new law?
Of the 23 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 4% are rated left, 9% are rated centre, 87% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 28. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Investigative journalist sues California over new law left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 87% of the 23 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
Is the coverage of Investigative journalist sues California over new law biased?
Investigative journalist sues California over new law is one event reported by 28 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Investigative journalist sues California over new law?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Investigative journalist sues California over new law?
28 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Who is Nick Shirley and why is he suing California?
Nick Shirley is an investigative journalist who has filed a lawsuit against the state of California. He is challenging Assembly Bill 2624, which critics have dubbed the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.' Shirley argues the law violates his free speech rights and could restrict his reporting on immigration-service organizations.
What is Assembly Bill 2624, also known as the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act'?
Assembly Bill 2624 is a California law that restricts the publication of certain identifying information about workers at organizations that provide immigration-related services. Critics, including investigative journalist Nick Shirley, have nicknamed it the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.'
Who is named in Nick Shirley's lawsuit?
The lawsuit filed by Nick Shirley names California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber as defendants. The suit challenges Assembly Bill 2624, which opponents have called the 'Stop Nick Shirley Act.'

Read it at the source

28 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

2

Right

20
Show 12 more

Not rated

5

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Nick Shirley sues California | MediaBias News