Is mycharisma.com biased?
mycharisma.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is mycharisma.com biased?
mycharisma.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is mycharisma.com left or right?
mycharisma.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is mycharisma.com reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for mycharisma.com. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What mycharisma.com has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with mycharisma.com’s own report linked underneath.
More than 100 of Abdul El-Sayed’s YouTube videos were removed or made private before his 2026 Senate campaign. CNN reported that some criticised Fourth of July fireworks, the Second Amendment and American football, prompting backlash from Republican opponents and scrutiny from Democrats.
mycharisma.com reported it asWake Up, America: Abdul El-Sayed's Own Words Reveal a Dangerous Threat to the Second Amendment - Charisma Magazine Online (opens mycharisma.com in a new tab)
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani denied claims by conservative leaders that his planned low-price grocery stores would require ID, calling the allegations 'insane'. The dispute centres on whether Democrats’ opposition to voter ID laws is inconsistent with the city’s grocery plan, which officials say will not require identification.
mycharisma.com reported it asMamdani Backtracks on Controversial Grocery ID Claims - Charisma Magazine Online (opens mycharisma.com in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed mycharisma.com. We asked on 10 August 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for mycharisma.com.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- mycharisma.com
- Seen publishing on
- mycharisma.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 7 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. mycharisma.com has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of mycharisma.com: its report arrived a median of 3 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 12 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 12 August 2026. Ratings pulled 10 August 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where mycharisma.com publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.