Skip to the story
All stories

Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media

Bill imposes prison sentences of up to two years for contact with outlets deemed hostile to the Islamic Republic

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media

What this story says

  • Iran’s parliament passed a bill on 16 August 2026 that criminalises interviews or other contact with US or Israeli media, or outlets financed by either country.
  • Violations carry prison sentences of six months to two years, with cases to be heard by Revolutionary Courts.
  • The bill must still be reviewed by the Guardian Council before it can become law.
  • Interviews with other foreign media will require notification to Iran’s intelligence ministry.

Who covered it

Left 22%(8)Centre 20%(7)Right 58%(21)

Percentages are shares of the 36 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 32 of the 68 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

56/100

Craft

85/100

Hype

15/100

68 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 8 of the 36 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Iran’s parliament approved a bill on 16 August 2026 that makes it a crime to give interviews or take part in discussions with media deemed hostile to the Islamic Republic. The legislation targets US and Israeli outlets, as well as any media financed by either country. Violations are punishable by six months to two years in prison.

The bill must still be reviewed by the Guardian Council, a body that vets legislation for compliance with Iran’s constitution and Islamic law. If approved, it will expand existing restrictions on contact with foreign entities. Interviews with other foreign media will require notification to the intelligence ministry. Contact with foreign embassies or organisations without written permission from the foreign ministry will also be punishable by fines and loss of social rights.

The legislation also increases penalties for economic crimes linked to foreigners, bans providing information to foreign entities without intelligence ministry approval, and restricts scientific cooperation with foreign institutions outside an approved list. Policy proposals made under the direction of foreign intelligence services that harm Iran’s security or independence could result in prison sentences of up to 30 years.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mentioned that the bill must still be reviewed by the Guardian Council. The Deccan Herald was the only report to include the case of Yalda Moaiery and the bill’s provisions on economic crimes and scientific cooperation. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the bill’s restrictions on policy proposals made under foreign direction or the role of Revolutionary Courts in hearing cases.

Coverage settled. We checked this 36 times and stopped on 22 Aug 2026, 02:31. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

8 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports agree that Iran’s parliament approved a bill on 16 August 2026 to criminalise interviews with US and Israeli media, with prison terms of six months to two years for violations. All seven outlets carried the requirement for Guardian Council review before the bill becomes law.
  • Six digests and the Deccan Herald report led on the prison sentence range. The Deccan Herald’s full article added that interviews with other foreign media would require notification to the intelligence ministry, and that economic crimes linked to foreigners would face harsher penalties. It also noted a 2025 law imposing tougher penalties for cooperation with hostile states.
  • Only the Deccan Herald named the Revolutionary Courts as the venue for trials under the new law. It alone quoted the 15-year sentence handed to photojournalist Yalda Moaiery this month under the 2025 law, citing interviews with hostile media and providing photographs to US and Israel-linked organisations.

Centre

7 rated outlets

  • The four centre-rated digests, Jerusalem Post, WTVB, Reuters and The Japan Times, all carried the core facts: the bill’s approval by parliament, the two-year prison sentence for violations, and the requirement for Guardian Council review. The Jerusalem Post and The Japan Times added that interviews with other foreign media would require notification to the intelligence ministry.
  • None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the bill’s provisions on economic crimes, scientific cooperation, or the case of Yalda Moaiery. The Reuters digest, which was republished by WTVB, was the most widely cited among the digests.

Right

21 rated outlets

  • The seven right-rated digests, India Today, regionalmedianews.com, The Straits Times, SRN News, WKZO, WTAQ and WSAU, all led on the prison sentence for contact with hostile media. India Today’s headline framed the bill as a direct ban: “Talk to hostile foreign media, go to jail: Iran to ban US, Israeli outlets contact.”
  • The digests from regionalmedianews.com, SRN News, WKZO, WTAQ and WSAU were identical, repeating the Reuters digest verbatim. The Straits Times added a call to “read more” but did not include additional details. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the bill’s provisions on economic crimes, scientific cooperation, or the requirement for intelligence ministry notification for other foreign media.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media?
Of the 36 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 22% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 58% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 68. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 36 rated outlets on this story, 22% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 58% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media biased?
Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media is one event reported by 68 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Iran parliament criminalises interviews with US and Israeli media?
68 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What does the new Iranian bill criminalise?
The bill criminalises interviews or other communications with US or Israeli media, or outlets financed by either country. Violations are punishable by six months to two years in prison. It also requires notification to the intelligence ministry for interviews with other foreign media and restricts contact with foreign embassies without permission.
Who must approve the bill before it becomes law?
The bill must be reviewed by Iran’s Guardian Council, a body that ensures legislation complies with the constitution and Islamic law. The council has the power to approve, reject, or request amendments to the bill before it can become law.
Which outlets reported on the case of Yalda Moaiery?
The Deccan Herald was the only outlet to report on the case of Yalda Moaiery, an Iranian photojournalist sentenced to 15 years in prison under a 2025 law for alleged cooperation with hostile states, including giving interviews to US and Israel-linked media.

Read it at the source

69 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

8

Centre

7

Right

22
Show 14 more

Not rated

32
Show 24 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Iran parliament bans interviews with US and Israeli media | MediaBias News