Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics20 outlets ran this5 min read

Judge fines US government $500 daily for delaying immigration agents' phone records

Federal court holds Homeland Security in contempt over slow imaging of 800+ devices from Los Angeles raids

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Judge fines US government $500 daily for delaying immigration agents' phone records

What this story says

  • U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt for delaying imaging of personal cell phones used by over 800 immigration agents in Los Angeles raids.
  • The judge imposed a $500 daily fine on the federal government until the records are produced, with DHS attorneys estimating nearly four years to complete the task at the current pace.
  • The case stems from 2025 immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles, with plaintiffs alleging racial profiling and seeking evidence from the agents' phones.
  • The Department of Homeland Security issued a statement criticising media focus on the case rather than crimes attributed to undocumented immigrants.

Who covered it

Left 56%(9)Centre 38%(6)Right 6%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 16 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 4 of the 20 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

64/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

20 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 1 of the 16 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

A federal judge in California held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt on 4 August 2026 for failing to comply with an order to image personal cell phones of immigration agents involved in Los Angeles raids in 2025. U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong imposed a fine of $500 per day on the federal government until the records are produced.

The order concerns more than 800 agents who participated in Operation At Large, a series of immigration enforcement actions in Los Angeles. Attorneys for the Department of Homeland Security told the court in June that the agency was processing the devices at a rate of three phones every two weeks, a pace that would take nearly four years to complete.

Plaintiffs in the case, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, argue that the phones may contain evidence of racial profiling by federal agents. Court records cite text messages and body camera footage in which agents used terms such as "wet" and "tonks" to identify working-class Latinos during stops. The Department of Homeland Security has not responded to questions about whether the use of those terms violated its policy.

Disagreement over the fine amount

The Washington Times reported that the Trump administration said it paid a $3,500 fine for being in contempt of court. The Associated Press and Washington Top News, which carried the full reports, did not mention this figure. The reports agree that a fine was imposed but disagree on the amount paid.

What the coverage left out

None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the racial slurs cited in court records or the allegations of racial profiling. The right-rated digest did not mention the $500 daily fine, the number of agents involved, or the estimated time to complete the imaging. The Daily Record digest, which was left-rated, focused on the effects of immigration enforcement on California farmworkers and did not mention the contempt ruling or the phone imaging order.

Tags:#ImmigrationEnforcement#DepartmentOfHomelandSecurity#FederalCourt#RacialProfiling#TrumpAdministration

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 5 Aug 2026, 19:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

9 rated outlets

  • The eight left-rated digests and full reports led on the contempt ruling and the $500 daily fine. They included the number of agents involved (over 800), the estimated time to complete the imaging (nearly four years), and the allegations of racial profiling. The Associated Press and Washington Top News, whose full reports were printed, quoted the ACLU’s Mayra Joachin: "Not only are federal agents violating the Constitution on the streets, the government is violating court orders by intentionally withholding critical evidence."
  • The left-rated reports named the racial slurs cited in court records and noted that the Department of Homeland Security had not responded to questions about whether their use violated policy. The Los Angeles Times digest mentioned that the contempt order was newly unsealed.

Centre

6 rated outlets

  • The five centre-rated digests led on the contempt ruling and the $500 daily fine. They included the number of agents involved and the slow pace of imaging. Washington Top News, whose full report was printed, quoted the Department of Homeland Security’s statement: "Our agents are focused on protecting the American people, not entertaining performative outrage." The statement also asked, "Where is the media’s outrage for Angel families who lost a loved one to illegal alien crime?"
  • The centre-rated digests did not mention the racial slurs or the allegations of racial profiling. None of the centre-rated digests included the ACLU’s criticism of the government’s compliance.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • The single right-rated digest, from the Washington Times, led on the $3,500 fine paid by the Trump administration. It framed the story as a failure to produce documents rather than a delay in imaging phones. The digest did not mention the $500 daily fine, the number of agents involved, the estimated time to complete the task, or the allegations of racial profiling.

Read it at the source

20 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

9
Show 1 more

Centre

6

Right

1

Not rated

4

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
Trump administration proposes changes to Head Start programme rules3 min readTrump administration proposes changes to Head Start programme rulesRead storyStudents help put away supplies at the end of a reading and writing lesson at the Head Start program run by Easterseals, an organization that gets about a third of its funding from the federal government, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025, in Miami. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)3 min readTrump administration plans Head Start overhaul to remove federal standardsRead storyMembers of the National Guard patrol around the Washington Monument, before Marine One, with President Donald Trump aboard, departs near the White House, Friday, July 17, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)4 min readNational Guard deployment in Washington extended to 2029 at $1.4bn costRead story
Judge fines US government $500 daily over delayed immigration phone records | MediaBias News