Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong Blocks Warrantless Immigration Arrests in Southern California

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong Blocks Warrantless Immigration…?

Of the 52 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 39% are rated left, 47% are rated centre, 14% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 73. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong Blocks Warrantless Immigration… left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 52 rated outlets on this story, 39% are rated left, 47% are rated centre, 14% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong Blocks Warrantless Immigration… biased?

Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong Blocks Warrantless Immigration Arrests in Southern California is one event reported by 73 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong Blocks Warrantless Immigration…?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong Blocks Warrantless Immigration…?

73 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What did the judge order regarding immigration arrests?

U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong issued a preliminary injunction blocking immigration officers in Southern California from making arrests without a warrant unless they determine the person is likely to escape. The order requires officers to consider the totality of circumstances known to them.

Who filed the lawsuit that led to this ruling?

The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Public Counsel, and Los Angeles immigrant advocacy groups. These organizations argued against warrantless arrests made without assessing the likelihood of escape.

Which areas does the judge's order cover?

The preliminary injunction applies to the Central District of California. This includes seven counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo.