New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements
Eight states challenge federal deals that redirected funds from renewable energy to fossil fuels.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
imageBROKER/Shutterstock
Photograph: Gothamist (embedded from source)
What this story says
- New York and New Jersey are among eight states suing the federal government over settlements that cancelled offshore wind projects.
- The settlements redirected more than $1.4 billion from renewable energy development to fossil fuel projects.
- Lawsuits allege the deals are an illegal use of taxpayer dollars and hinder clean energy goals.
- The Trump administration stated the projects posed national security risks and companies agreed to the deals.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 31 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 34 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
61/100
Hype
20/100
34 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 3 of the 31 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
New York and New Jersey have joined a multistate coalition of eight states filing lawsuits against the federal government. The suits challenge a pair of settlements that redirected more than $1.4 billion away from offshore wind development and toward fossil fuel projects. The states argue these deals, struck earlier this year, represent an illegal use of taxpayer dollars and have resulted in the cancellation of projects that could have provided needed electricity and jobs.
One settlement involved Bluepoint Wind, which had a lease for a project 38 miles south of Long Island. The company received $765 million from the federal government, money that Bluepoint plans to use to build a liquified natural gas facility. Another settlement concerned Invenergy, which held leases off the Jersey Shore and in the Gulf of Maine. Invenergy received $653 million, which the company intends to reinvest in natural gas power plants.
California is also suing over the cancellation of Invenergy California Offshore LLC.'s federal leases for projects in the Morro Bay Wind Energy Area, New York Bight, and Gulf of Maine. California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated the deal would send $111 million to the fossil fuel industry. The federal government is funding these settlements from the Department of Justice’s Judgement Fund.
Disagreement on settlement terms
Gothamist reported that the Bluepoint settlement pays $765 million to the company, and that money will be spent on oil and gas development. It also stated that Invenergy received $653 million to be reinvested in oil and gas projects. KEYT reported that Invenergy would receive a partial refund of capital it previously paid to the government for the leases and be required to make investments into domestic natural gas and geothermal projects. KEYT also stated that the terms of the buyout agreement require Invenergy to cause its corporate affiliates to invest up to $111,769,231 in fossil fuel and geothermal energy projects.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated reports mention the specific amounts of $765 million paid to Bluepoint Wind or $653 million paid to Invenergy. The left-rated and centre-rated reports also did not mention the specific figure of $111 million that California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated would go to the fossil fuel industry.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 22 Sept 2026, 20:31, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements
KEYT — embedded from source
(AP Photo/Joshua A. Bickel)
Spectrum News — embedded from source
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
15 rated outlets
- Reports from the left-rated outlets led on the lawsuits filed by New York and New Jersey against the Trump administration over settlements that cancelled offshore wind projects. These reports highlighted that the settlements redirected more than $1.4 billion from offshore wind development to fossil fuel projects. They quoted New York Attorney General Letitia James, who stated the deals were an "illegal use of taxpayer dollars" and "corruption over communities." The left-rated reports also mentioned California's lawsuit over the cancellation of Invenergy California Offshore LLC.'s federal leases, with Attorney General Rob Bonta stating the deal would send $111 million to the fossil fuel industry. The funding of these settlements from the Department of Justice’s Judgement Fund was noted. Some reports mentioned that the Trump administration had previously reached similar deals with other companies, such as TotalEnergies.
Centre
13 rated outlets
- Reports from the centre-rated outlets focused on the lawsuits filed by California and New York against the Trump administration regarding offshore wind lease settlements. These reports stated that eight states filed lawsuits challenging the federal government's payments to private companies to cancel offshore wind leases. They noted that the settlements involved redirecting funds from wind energy to fossil fuel projects. The centre-rated reports mentioned the amounts involved in the Bluepoint and Invenergy settlements, stating that Bluepoint received $765 million and Invenergy received $653 million. California Attorney General Rob Bonta was quoted as saying he is suing over the removal of a project off his state's coast. Some reports included a statement from a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of the Interior, Charlotte Taylor, who said the department would not comment on litigation but noted the administration determined the projects posed national security risks and that companies voluntarily agreed to the deals.
Right
3 rated outlets
- The right-rated reports focused on California suing the Trump administration over a deal to cancel an offshore wind project. These reports stated that the state is challenging a settlement that exchanged tens of millions of dollars for a promise to invest in fossil fuels. The reports mentioned that the Interior Department struck an agreement with an energy developer to cancel an offshore wind project.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements?
- Of the 31 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 48% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 10% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 34. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 31 rated outlets on this story, 48% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 10% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements biased?
- New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements is one event reported by 34 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements?
- 34 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Why are New York and New Jersey suing the federal government?
- New York and New Jersey, along with six other states, are suing the federal government over settlements that cancelled offshore wind projects. They allege these deals improperly redirected over $1.4 billion from renewable energy development to fossil fuel projects, constituting an illegal use of taxpayer money.
- What were the specific settlements being challenged?
- The lawsuits challenge two specific settlements. One involved Bluepoint Wind, which received $765 million for a project planned south of Long Island. The other involved Invenergy, which received $653 million for leases off the Jersey Shore and in the Gulf of Maine. California is also suing over Invenergy's cancelled leases.
- What is the federal government's stated reason for these settlements?
- A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of the Interior stated that the Trump administration determined the offshore wind projects posed national security risks. The department also noted that the companies voluntarily agreed to the deals, which were reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Read it at the source
34 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
15- States file new lawsuits against Trump’s payouts stopping offshore wind (opens Pennsylvania Capital-Star in a new tab)
Pennsylvania Capital-Star — is Pennsylvania Capital-Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Maine, northeast states file new lawsuit against Trump’s payouts stopping offshore wind (opens mainemorningstar.com in a new tab)
mainemorningstar.com — is mainemorningstar.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States file new lawsuits against Trump’s payouts stopping offshore wind (opens Source New Mexico in a new tab)
Source New Mexico — is Source New Mexico biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Inside the $1.4B taxpayer-backed buyout to kill N.J. offshore wind projects (opens nj in a new tab)
- NY, NJ sue Trump admin over deals to scrap offshore wind projects (opens Gothamist in a new tab)
- States file new lawsuits against Trump’s payouts stopping offshore wind (opens Stateline in a new tab)
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 7 more
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens Bangor Daily News in a new tab)
Bangor Daily News — is Bangor Daily News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens ABC News in a new tab)
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, Maine lead challenge against Trump offshore wind dealings (opens Courthouse News Service in a new tab)
Courthouse News Service — is Courthouse News Service biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
13- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens My Mother Lode in a new tab)
My Mother Lode — is My Mother Lode biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in a new tab)
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette — is Pittsburgh Post-Gazette biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CT sues Trump administration over payouts stopping offshore wind (opens The CT Mirror in a new tab)
The CT Mirror — is The CT Mirror biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California Sues Trump Administration Over Deal To Kill Local Offshore Wind Project (opens KEYT in a new tab)
- California, New York sue to block Trump deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens NY1 in a new tab)
- California, New York sue to block Trump deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens Spectrum News in a new tab)
Spectrum News — is Spectrum News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California, New York sue to block Trump deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens Spectrum Local News in a new tab)
Spectrum Local News — is Spectrum Local News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record
Show 5 more
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling (opens WBAL in a new tab)
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens WV News in a new tab)
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens WKMG in a new tab)
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens WPLG in a new tab)
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
3- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens Boston Herald in a new tab)
Boston Herald — is Boston Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens MY Northwest in a new tab)
MY Northwest — is MY Northwest biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues Trump over deal to cancel offshore wind projects (opens Washington Examiner in a new tab)
Washington Examiner — is Washington Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
3- California and New York Demand Trump for Plan to Stop Wind Power Generation · Global Voices (opens Independent Español in a new tab)
Independent Español — is Independent Español biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New York, California sue to block Trump administration deals canceling offshore wind projects (opens BizToc in a new tab)
- New Jersey joins lawsuits challenging cancellation of offshore wind leases - WRNJ Radio (opens WRNJ Radio, Inc in a new tab)
WRNJ Radio, Inc — is WRNJ Radio, Inc biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


