Skip to the story
All stories

New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements

Eight states challenge federal deals that redirected funds from renewable energy to fossil fuels.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
imageBROKER/Shutterstock

What this story says

  • New York and New Jersey are among eight states suing the federal government over settlements that cancelled offshore wind projects.
  • The settlements redirected more than $1.4 billion from renewable energy development to fossil fuel projects.
  • Lawsuits allege the deals are an illegal use of taxpayer dollars and hinder clean energy goals.
  • The Trump administration stated the projects posed national security risks and companies agreed to the deals.

Who covered it

Left 48%(15)Centre 42%(13)Right 10%(3)

Percentages are shares of the 31 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 34 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

20/100

34 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 3 of the 31 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

New York and New Jersey have joined a multistate coalition of eight states filing lawsuits against the federal government. The suits challenge a pair of settlements that redirected more than $1.4 billion away from offshore wind development and toward fossil fuel projects. The states argue these deals, struck earlier this year, represent an illegal use of taxpayer dollars and have resulted in the cancellation of projects that could have provided needed electricity and jobs.

One settlement involved Bluepoint Wind, which had a lease for a project 38 miles south of Long Island. The company received $765 million from the federal government, money that Bluepoint plans to use to build a liquified natural gas facility. Another settlement concerned Invenergy, which held leases off the Jersey Shore and in the Gulf of Maine. Invenergy received $653 million, which the company intends to reinvest in natural gas power plants.

California is also suing over the cancellation of Invenergy California Offshore LLC.'s federal leases for projects in the Morro Bay Wind Energy Area, New York Bight, and Gulf of Maine. California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated the deal would send $111 million to the fossil fuel industry. The federal government is funding these settlements from the Department of Justice’s Judgement Fund.

Disagreement on settlement terms

Gothamist reported that the Bluepoint settlement pays $765 million to the company, and that money will be spent on oil and gas development. It also stated that Invenergy received $653 million to be reinvested in oil and gas projects. KEYT reported that Invenergy would receive a partial refund of capital it previously paid to the government for the leases and be required to make investments into domestic natural gas and geothermal projects. KEYT also stated that the terms of the buyout agreement require Invenergy to cause its corporate affiliates to invest up to $111,769,231 in fossil fuel and geothermal energy projects.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated reports mention the specific amounts of $765 million paid to Bluepoint Wind or $653 million paid to Invenergy. The left-rated and centre-rated reports also did not mention the specific figure of $111 million that California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated would go to the fossil fuel industry.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 22 Sept 2026, 20:31, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements
KEYTCentre
(AP Photo/Joshua A. Bickel)
Spectrum NewsCentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

15 rated outlets

  • Reports from the left-rated outlets led on the lawsuits filed by New York and New Jersey against the Trump administration over settlements that cancelled offshore wind projects. These reports highlighted that the settlements redirected more than $1.4 billion from offshore wind development to fossil fuel projects. They quoted New York Attorney General Letitia James, who stated the deals were an "illegal use of taxpayer dollars" and "corruption over communities." The left-rated reports also mentioned California's lawsuit over the cancellation of Invenergy California Offshore LLC.'s federal leases, with Attorney General Rob Bonta stating the deal would send $111 million to the fossil fuel industry. The funding of these settlements from the Department of Justice’s Judgement Fund was noted. Some reports mentioned that the Trump administration had previously reached similar deals with other companies, such as TotalEnergies.

Centre

13 rated outlets

  • Reports from the centre-rated outlets focused on the lawsuits filed by California and New York against the Trump administration regarding offshore wind lease settlements. These reports stated that eight states filed lawsuits challenging the federal government's payments to private companies to cancel offshore wind leases. They noted that the settlements involved redirecting funds from wind energy to fossil fuel projects. The centre-rated reports mentioned the amounts involved in the Bluepoint and Invenergy settlements, stating that Bluepoint received $765 million and Invenergy received $653 million. California Attorney General Rob Bonta was quoted as saying he is suing over the removal of a project off his state's coast. Some reports included a statement from a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of the Interior, Charlotte Taylor, who said the department would not comment on litigation but noted the administration determined the projects posed national security risks and that companies voluntarily agreed to the deals.

Right

3 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports focused on California suing the Trump administration over a deal to cancel an offshore wind project. These reports stated that the state is challenging a settlement that exchanged tens of millions of dollars for a promise to invest in fossil fuels. The reports mentioned that the Interior Department struck an agreement with an energy developer to cancel an offshore wind project.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements?
Of the 31 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 48% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 10% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 34. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 31 rated outlets on this story, 48% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 10% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements biased?
New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements is one event reported by 34 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered New York, California Sue Over Offshore Wind Lease Settlements?
34 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why are New York and New Jersey suing the federal government?
New York and New Jersey, along with six other states, are suing the federal government over settlements that cancelled offshore wind projects. They allege these deals improperly redirected over $1.4 billion from renewable energy development to fossil fuel projects, constituting an illegal use of taxpayer money.
What were the specific settlements being challenged?
The lawsuits challenge two specific settlements. One involved Bluepoint Wind, which received $765 million for a project planned south of Long Island. The other involved Invenergy, which received $653 million for leases off the Jersey Shore and in the Gulf of Maine. California is also suing over Invenergy's cancelled leases.
What is the federal government's stated reason for these settlements?
A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of the Interior stated that the Trump administration determined the offshore wind projects posed national security risks. The department also noted that the companies voluntarily agreed to the deals, which were reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Read it at the source

34 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

15
Show 7 more

Centre

13
Show 5 more

Right

3

Not rated

3

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

States Sue US Over Wind Lease Settlements | MediaBias News