Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social media posts
Legislation follows launch of Trump Media premium service offering expedited Truth Social alerts
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Donald Trump holds up a printout of one of his Truth Social posts
Photograph: Common Dreams (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Senator Alex Padilla introduced the Stop Corrupt Trading Act to ban presidents and vice presidents from selling early access to their social media posts.
- The bill follows Trump Media & Technology Group’s launch of a premium service offering expedited access to Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts.
- House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin announced an investigation into the service as a potential insider-information scheme.
- Left-rated outlets led on the corruption framing, while right-rated digests described the bill as a Democratic response to Trump Media’s service.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 30 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 4 of the 34 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
50/100
Craft
87/100
Hype
15/100
34 sources · methodology
Missing from the left
Only 3 of the 30 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.
A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
Senator Alex Padilla introduced legislation on 4 August 2026 to prohibit sitting presidents and vice presidents from selling early access to their social media posts. The Stop Corrupt Trading Act would apply to both official and personal accounts and would impose civil penalties for violations. Padilla’s office said the bill targets what it called a blatant abuse of public office for private gain.
The legislation follows the launch of a premium service by Trump Media & Technology Group, which offers subscribers expedited access to posts from Donald Trump’s Truth Social account. The service was announced days before Padilla’s bill. House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, a Democrat, announced an investigation into the service, describing it as an insider-information scheme that could give wealthy investors an unfair advantage.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated digests mentioned Jamie Raskin’s investigation into the Trump Media service as an insider-information scheme. None of the centre-rated digests named Alex Padilla or carried the name of the legislation, the Stop Corrupt Trading Act. The left-rated digests did not report that the bill would apply to future presidents and vice presidents beyond Donald Trump and JD Vance.
Coverage settled. We checked this 12 times and stopped on 10 Aug 2026, 08:45. The figures above are what it finished at.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
3 rated outlets
- Common Dreams led with Padilla’s framing of the bill as a response to corruption. The outlet quoted Padilla calling Donald Trump "the most corrupt president in American history" and describing the premium service as evidence of a government "for sale to hedge funds and Wall Street banks." It named the legislation the Stop Corrupt Trading Act and carried Padilla’s statement that the bill would establish civil penalties for selling nonpublic government information.
- NBC News’s digest described the bill as targeting a "new paid service from Trump Media promising faster alerts to posts from President Donald Trump." Neither left-rated digest mentioned Raskin’s investigation or the potential market impact of the service.
Centre
14 rated outlets
- All five centre-rated digests carried the same summary from The Center Square, which described the bill as a response to Trump Media’s new service. The digests led on the service itself, stating that it offered "fast access to Truth Social posts," and framed the legislation as a Democratic initiative to bar presidents from profiting off advance access to their own statements. None mentioned Padilla’s name, the name of the bill, or Raskin’s investigation.
Right
13 rated outlets
- The six right-rated digests also carried The Center Square’s summary, which framed the bill as a Democratic response to Trump Media’s service. The digests described the service as selling "fast access to Truth Social posts" and the legislation as an attempt to bar presidents from profiting off advance access to their own social media. None named Padilla, the bill’s title, or Raskin’s investigation.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social…?
- Of the 30 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 10% are rated left, 47% are rated centre, 43% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 34. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 30 rated outlets on this story, 10% are rated left, 47% are rated centre, 43% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social… biased?
- Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social media posts is one event reported by 34 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Padilla introduces bill to block Trump selling early access to social…?
- 34 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What does Padilla’s bill propose?
- The Stop Corrupt Trading Act would prohibit presidents and vice presidents from selling early access to their social media posts. It would apply to both official and personal accounts and establish civil penalties for violations. Padilla introduced the bill after Trump Media launched a premium service offering expedited access to Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts.
- Why did Democrats introduce the legislation?
- Senator Alex Padilla and Representative Jamie Raskin framed the bill as a response to what they called an abuse of public office for private gain. Raskin announced an investigation into Trump Media’s premium service, describing it as an insider-information scheme that could give wealthy investors an unfair advantage in financial markets.
- How did right-rated outlets cover the story?
- Right-rated digests described the bill as a Democratic response to Trump Media’s new service, which offers fast access to Truth Social posts. None mentioned Jamie Raskin’s investigation or the name of the legislation, and all used the same summary from The Center Square.
Read it at the source
34 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
3- Padilla Unveils Bill to Stop Trump From Selling Access to 'Market-Moving Social Media Posts' (opens Common Dreams in a new tab)
Common Dreams — is Common Dreams biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Daily Post-Athenian in a new tab)
Daily Post-Athenian — is Daily Post-Athenian biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New bill would stop Trump Media from selling speedy access to president’s posts (opens NBC News in a new tab)
Centre
14- Sen. Padilla Introduces Bill to Ban Trump From Selling Social Media Access (opens edhat.com in a new tab)
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Idaho County Free Press in a new tab)
Idaho County Free Press — is Idaho County Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Your Alaska Link in a new tab)
Your Alaska Link — is Your Alaska Link biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens The Penn in a new tab)
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Columbia Gorge News in a new tab)
Columbia Gorge News — is Columbia Gorge News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Tioga Publishing in a new tab)
Tioga Publishing — is Tioga Publishing biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Star Local in a new tab)
Star Local — is Star Local biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens The Guam Daily Post in a new tab)
The Guam Daily Post — is The Guam Daily Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 6 more
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Delaware Business Now in a new tab)
Delaware Business Now — is Delaware Business Now biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens http://www.wfxg.com in a new tab)
http://www.wfxg.com — is http://www.wfxg.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens News-Graphic.com in a new tab)
News-Graphic.com — is News-Graphic.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens InsideNoVA.com in a new tab)
InsideNoVA.com — is InsideNoVA.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Senate Democrat unveils bill barring social media from selling early access to official posts after Trump API launch (opens The Hill in a new tab)
- Trump backs card bill, again (opens Payments Dive in a new tab)
Payments Dive — is Payments Dive biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
13- Trump’s sale of access to Truth Social raises eyebrows (opens Free Malaysia Today News in a new tab)
Free Malaysia Today News — is Free Malaysia Today News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Chronicle-Tribune in a new tab)
Chronicle-Tribune — is Chronicle-Tribune biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens The Elkhart Truth in a new tab)
The Elkhart Truth — is The Elkhart Truth biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens The Center Square in a new tab)
The Center Square — is The Center Square biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens The Mountain Press in a new tab)
The Mountain Press — is The Mountain Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens KTEN in a new tab)
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens [your]NEWS in a new tab)
[your]NEWS — is [your]NEWS biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Princeton Clarion in a new tab)
Princeton Clarion — is Princeton Clarion biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 5 more
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Rochester Sentinel in a new tab)
Rochester Sentinel — is Rochester Sentinel biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Bryan Times in a new tab)
Bryan Times — is Bryan Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens The Herald Palladium in a new tab)
The Herald Palladium — is The Herald Palladium biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Marietta Daily Journal in a new tab)
Marietta Daily Journal — is Marietta Daily Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump Sells Privileged Access to Truth Social Publications for $100,000 per Month (opens Le Journal de Montreal in a new tab)
Le Journal de Montreal — is Le Journal de Montreal biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
4- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts - BIZ Magazine (opens bizmagsb.com in a new tab)
bizmagsb.com — is bizmagsb.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Alex Padilla Has A Bombshell New Bill That Would Allow The American People To Sue Trump (opens The Daily in a new tab)
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Fort Wayne Business Weekly in a new tab)
Fort Wayne Business Weekly — is Fort Wayne Business Weekly biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bill would bar Trump Media from selling early access to posts (opens Sunnyside Sun in a new tab)
Sunnyside Sun — is Sunnyside Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


