Pentagon adviser Ryan Higgins' online posts draw scrutiny
Reports detail adviser's history of sharing views described as racist and homophobic.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Source: MEGAAn advisor to Hegseth espoused far-right rhetoric online.
Photograph: OK! Magazine (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Ryan Higgins, a senior adviser to Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon, has a history of sharing online views described as racist, homophobic, and conspiratorial.
- Higgins is credited with developing the Defense Department's religious messaging and the 'Office of Religious Affairs'.
- His online posts include references to a 'satanic cult of LGBTQ' and concerns about illegal immigrants 'raping our white women'.
- A Pentagon spokesperson called a report detailing these posts a 'pathetic attempt to slander' Higgins.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 8 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 9 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
60/100
Hype
65/100
9 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 8 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Ryan Higgins, a senior adviser to Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon, has shared online posts containing views described as racist, homophobic, and conspiratorial. Multiple sources credit Higgins with developing the Defense Department's religious messaging and the creation of the 'Office of Religious Affairs'.
Higgins posted on X about the 'satanic cult of LGBTQ' and made comments about illegal immigrants 'raping our white women'. He also expressed skepticism about the legitimacy of US elections, stating he has '0 percent faith in our elections'.
Pentagon response
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell described a CNN report detailing Higgins' posts as 'a pathetic attempt to slander' Higgins. Parnell stated the report was designed to distract from the work the Department is carrying out.
What the coverage left out
None of the reports below mention the specific date of the CNN investigation into Ryan Higgins' online posts, only that it was published on October 27. The reports also do not include the specific number of followers Higgins has on X, only that he has '14,000 followers' according to OK! Magazine.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 6 times, most recently on 27 Oct 2026, 23:30, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
7 rated outlets
- The left-rated report from OK! Magazine led with the assertion that the man shaping the Pentagon's religious agenda has a lengthy history of sharing racist, homophobic, and conspiratorial views online. It detailed Higgins' posts about the 'satanic cult of LGBTQ' and illegal immigrants 'raping our white women'. The report also highlighted his skepticism about US election legitimacy, stating he has '0 percent faith in our elections'. It noted Higgins does not disclose his Pentagon position on his X account, where he shares far-right and white nationalist rhetoric. The outlet also mentioned that Pentagon officials downplayed Higgins' influence.
Centre
1 rated outlet
We have not written our reading of the centre coverage of this story. The centre-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Pentagon adviser Ryan Higgins' online posts draw scrutiny?
- Of the 8 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 88% are rated left, 12% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 9. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Pentagon adviser Ryan Higgins' online posts draw scrutiny left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 8 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Pentagon adviser Ryan Higgins' online posts draw scrutiny biased?
- Pentagon adviser Ryan Higgins' online posts draw scrutiny is one event reported by 9 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Pentagon adviser Ryan Higgins' online posts draw scrutiny?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Pentagon adviser Ryan Higgins' online posts draw scrutiny?
- 9 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Who is Ryan Higgins and what is his role?
- Ryan Higgins is a senior adviser to Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon. He is credited with developing the Defense Department's religious messaging and the 'Office of Religious Affairs'.
- What kind of online posts has Ryan Higgins shared?
- Higgins has shared posts described as racist, homophobic, and conspiratorial. These include comments about a 'satanic cult of LGBTQ', illegal immigrants 'raping our white women', and skepticism about US election legitimacy.
- How has the Pentagon responded to the scrutiny of Higgins' posts?
- Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell called a report detailing Higgins' posts a 'pathetic attempt to slander' him. He stated the report was intended to distract from the Department's work.
Read it at the source
9 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
7- Pentagon Adviser Behind Pete Hegseth’s Religious Agenda Complains About a 'Satanic Cult of LGBTQ' and Shares Racist Views (opens OK! Magazine in a new tab)
OK! Magazine — is OK! Magazine biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CNN: Hegseth's Senior Faith Advisor Shared Scores Of Racist, Homophobic, Anti-Immigrant, Conspiracy Posts (opens Joe.My.God. in a new tab)
Joe.My.God. — is Joe.My.God. biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Hegseth's Religious Advisor: This Is a Christian Nation, LGBTQ Is a Satanic Cult (opens IndexHR in a new tab)
IndexHR — is IndexHR biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Pete Hegseth Hired a Christian Nationalist Lackey to Help Realize His Dream of an American Holy War (opens Esquire in a new tab)
Esquire — is Esquire biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Hegseth Faith Adviser’s Disgusting Social Media Comments Exposed (opens The New Republic in a new tab)
The New Republic — is The New Republic biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- ‘Killing and raping our white women’: Disturbing posts from Hegseth aide come to light (opens Raw Story in a new tab)
- Pete Hegseth’s faith adviser shared racist, homophobic posts (opens CNN in a new tab)
Centre
1Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
1How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
