Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics68 outlets ran this3 min read

President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of midterms

The ads cost between $1.4 million and $1.7 million, drew bipartisan criticism and were defended as public‑service announcements

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of midterms

What this story says

  • President Trump selected the imagery for taxpayer‑funded ads
  • The ads have cost about $1.4‑$1.7 million
  • Senate leaders John Thune and John Cornyn criticised the spending
  • The White House says the spots are public‑service announcements

Who covered it

Left 22%(12)Centre 74%(41)Right 4%(2)

Percentages are shares of the 55 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 13 of the 68 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

47/100

Craft

87/100

Hype

30/100

68 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 2 of the 55 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

A source familiar with the White House video operation told CNN that President Donald Trump personally chose the images and video clips used in a series of government‑funded television advertisements. The three spots were aired on major networks in the weeks before the November midterm elections and promoted the president’s record and policy agenda.

AdImpact and other media‑monitoring firms estimated that the campaign cost between $1.4 million and $1.7 million of taxpayer money. The spending prompted public criticism from both parties. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the ads should not be paid for with public funds, and Senator John Cornyn echoed that sentiment, calling the practice “questionable.”

The White House defended the advertisements, describing them as public‑service announcements similar to past government campaigns on Medicare, Obamacare and Covid‑19 vaccines. A White House spokesperson said the spots aim to remind Americans of the country’s values and achievements.

“It’s a perfectly reasonable message.”

— Scott Jennings, White House aide

$1.4‑$1.7 million

Estimated cost

Spent on three taxpayer‑funded TV ads, according to AdImpact and other trackers

Disagreement on cost estimate

AdImpact reported a spend of more than $1.4 million, while The Daily Boulder cited a figure of $1.7 million. The Las Vegas Review‑Journal noted the amount as “nearly $1.5 million.” Each outlet presented a different point within the $1.4‑$1.7 million range.

What the coverage left out

None of the right‑rated digests mention the $1.4‑$1.7 million cost estimate that appears in the left and centre reports. The left‑rated reports do not provide the exact cost figure used by the centre outlets, limiting the monetary detail to a single $1.7 million estimate. The centre‑rated digests omit the “propaganda” language and impeachment references that appear in the HuffPost full article.

Tags:#TrumpAds#TaxpayerFunding#BipartisanCriticism#WhiteHouseDefense#MidtermElections

Coverage settled. We checked this 12 times and stopped on 5 Oct 2026, 03:15. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

12 rated outlets

  • All nine left‑rated outlets highlighted the bipartisan backlash and framed the ads as political propaganda. HuffPost’s full report quoted Scott Jennings defending the spots and included a back‑and‑forth with CNN host Kaitlan Collins. The Daily Boulder, The Independent, Mediaite and Mother Jones stressed that Democrats and Republicans alike condemned the use of public money for what they called campaign‑style messaging. Several left outlets referenced calls for impeachment and described the ads as “propaganda” that stoked anti‑communist fear.

Centre

41 rated outlets

  • Across the centre sample, outlets reported that President Donald Trump personally directed video ads paid for with public money and meant to promote his image and administration’s policies. KIFI’s full report and digests from other centre outlets all said a source told CNN that Trump chose the imagery and audio and that the White House video team produced the spots before the November midterms.
  • KIFI’s report quoted Senate majority leader John Thune and Senator John Cornyn expressing that the ads should not be funded by taxpayers, and included a White House spokesperson defending the spots as public‑service messages. The report also cited Representative Jamie Raskin warning that the ads could breach the Hatch Act, and an unnamed former Trump campaign official calling the practice a serious wrongdoing.
  • Only the Las Vegas Review‑Journal digest mentioned a spending figure, citing AdImpact’s estimate that the ads had cost more than $1.4 million and could be close to $1.5 million. None of the other centre digests or KIFI’s full report provided a cost estimate, so the sample shows that the monetary scale of the campaign was largely omitted by most centre‑rated outlets.

Right

2 rated outlets

  • The single right‑rated outlet, The News, reported only that President Trump personally helped shape the taxpayer‑funded advertisements, citing the same CNN source. The digest did not mention the cost estimate, the criticism from Senate leaders, or the White House’s public‑service framing.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of…?
Of the 55 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 22% are rated left, 74% are rated centre, 4% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 68. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of… left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 74% of the 55 rated outlets on it are rated centre — so far this is a story carried mostly by the centre. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
Is the coverage of President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of… biased?
President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of midterms is one event reported by 68 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered President Trump personally directed taxpayer‑funded ads ahead of…?
68 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How much did the taxpayer‑funded ads cost?
AdImpact and other trackers placed the total spend between $1.4 million and $1.7 million. Different outlets reported figures of $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $1.7 million, all within that range.
What did Senate leaders say about the ads?
Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters the ads should not be paid for with taxpayer money, and Senator John Cornyn called the practice “questionable,” echoing Thune’s criticism.
How did the White House justify the advertisements?
A White House spokesperson described the spots as public‑service announcements, saying they are similar to previous government campaigns on health care and vaccines and are meant to remind Americans of national values.
Did President Trump have a role in creating the ads?
A source familiar with the White House video team told CNN that President Trump personally selected the images and video clips used in the ads, and multiple outlets repeated that claim.

Read it at the source

68 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

12
Show 4 more

Centre

41
Show 33 more

Right

2

Not rated

13
Show 5 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins3 min readDemocrat Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins Elected Alaska GovernorRead storyRep. Thomas Massie says new Iran War Powers resolution could reach House floor by Christmas3 min readRep. Thomas Massie says new Iran War Powers resolution could reach House floor by ChristmasRead storyJoe Biden with a USA flag behind him4 min readBiden defends 2024 re-election bid in new memoirRead story
Trump taxpayer-funded ads | MediaBias News