Republican congressman says Congress should do more for wealthy Americans
Glenn Grothman’s remarks in Michigan drew attention to the GOP’s economic priorities ahead of midterm elections
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
Grothman, currently serving his sixth term, is no stranger to controversial public statements (Getty)
Photograph: The Independent (US) (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI) said Congress should do more to help wealthy Americans during a panel in Troy, Michigan on 14 August 2026.
- The "One Big Beautiful Bill" passed the House 218-214 and the Senate 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. No Democrats supported it.
- CNN analyst Harry Enten reported the bill added $4 trillion to the national debt and lowered Trump’s approval rating on spending from 34% to 12%.
- Grothman is running for re-election in November against Democratic challenger Brad Smith.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
62/100
Craft
85/100
Hype
18/100
6 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI) said Congress should do "a little more" for wealthy Americans during a panel discussion in Troy, Michigan on 14 August 2026. The event focused on the Republican Party’s economic agenda and featured Michigan gubernatorial candidate Rep. John James (R-MI) and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA). Grothman, a six-term congressman, defended the 2025 "One Big Beautiful Bill" as aimed at helping the middle class, though he argued the government could do more for the wealthy.
The bill, a tax and spending package, passed the House 218-214 and the Senate 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. No Democrats voted for it, and two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), opposed it. Democrats criticised the bill for cutting assistance programmes for low-income families, including Medicaid and free school meals. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) filibustered for nearly nine hours against it.
CNN data analyst Harry Enten reported on 10 August 2026 that the bill added $4 trillion to the national debt. He also noted that Trump’s approval rating on government spending fell from 34% to 12% after its passage. Grothman is running for re-election in November against Democratic challenger Brad Smith.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated reports mentioned the Democratic filibuster or the specific cuts to Medicaid and free school meals. The centre-rated digest also omitted these details. The left-rated reports carried all the facts above.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 14 Aug 2026, 19:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wisc.) listens as Homeland Security Inspector General, Joseph Cuffari, testifies during a House National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C, June 6, 2023. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Independent Journal Review — embedded from source
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
5 rated outlets
- The left-rated reports led on Grothman’s statement that Congress should do more for wealthy Americans. The Independent’s full report quoted his remarks in full and noted his history of controversial statements, including comments about judicial nominees and Vice President Kamala Harris. It also detailed Democratic opposition to the bill, including the filibuster by Hakeem Jeffries and the cuts to low-income programmes.
- The Independent and Mediaite both included Enten’s analysis of the bill’s impact on the national debt and Trump’s approval ratings. Daily Kos, The Independent’s digest, and Joe.My.God. all carried Grothman’s quote verbatim. None of the left-rated digests omitted the $4 trillion debt figure or the bill’s partisan passage.
Centre
1 rated outlet
- The centre-rated digest from Political Wire led with Grothman’s quote that Congress should do more for wealthy Americans. It included his defence of the bill as aimed at the middle class but did not mention the Democratic filibuster, the cuts to low-income programmes, or Grothman’s past remarks. The $4 trillion debt figure was included.
Right
0 rated outlets
- The right-rated full report from Independent Journal Review led with Grothman’s argument that more should be done for wealthy Americans. It quoted his remarks in full and included a video clip of the panel. The report noted Enten’s analysis of the bill’s impact on the national debt and Trump’s approval ratings but did not mention the Democratic filibuster or the cuts to low-income programmes.
- The report highlighted Grothman’s loyalty to Trump, citing an Axios analysis that ranked him as the most loyal Trump supporter in Congress. It did not include his past comments about judicial nominees or Kamala Harris.
Read it at the source
7 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
5- GOP House goon says Congress isn’t ‘looking out for the rich’ (opens Daily Kos in a new tab)
- House Republican says Congress ‘should do a little more’ for the rich (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- House Republican says Congress ‘should do a little more’ for the rich (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- GOP Rep: “We Should Do A Little More For The Rich” (opens Joe.My.God. in a new tab)
Joe.My.God. — is Joe.My.God. biased? Our profile of this outlet
- House Republican Says ‘We Should Do a Little More’ for the Rich (opens Mediaite in a new tab)
Centre
1Right
1Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Republican congressman says Congress should do more for wealthy…?
- Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 83% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Republican congressman says Congress should do more for wealthy… left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Republican congressman says Congress should do more for wealthy… biased?
- Republican congressman says Congress should do more for wealthy Americans is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Republican congressman says Congress should do more for wealthy…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Republican congressman says Congress should do more for wealthy…?
- 6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What did Glenn Grothman say about wealthy Americans?
- Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI) said Congress should do "a little more" for wealthy Americans during a panel in Michigan. He defended the 2025 tax and spending bill as aimed at the middle class but argued the government could do more for the wealthy. The remark drew attention to GOP economic priorities ahead of midterm elections.
- How did the "One Big Beautiful Bill" pass Congress?
- The bill passed the House 218-214 and the Senate 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. No Democrats supported it, and two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick, opposed it. Democrats criticised the bill for cutting assistance programmes for low-income families.
- What was the impact of the bill on the national debt?
- CNN analyst Harry Enten reported the bill added $4 trillion to the national debt. Trump’s approval rating on government spending fell from 34% to 12% after its passage. The figure was included in reports from left- and centre-rated outlets but not omitted by any side.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

