Skip to the story
All stories

Senator Slotkin suggests prosecuting Trump aides to deter future hires

Michigan Democrat advocates for 'signature cases' to send a message to young people considering government work.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Michigan Democrat Elisa Slotkin shared last week that she wants to deter young people from serving in the Trump administration while participating in an event at UChicago last week

What this story says

  • Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin said Democrats should select 'signature cases' to prosecute and 'go after people and projects that are just super egregious' to create a 'deterrence message' for young people considering future Trump administration roles.
  • Slotkin made these remarks at a live recording of the America, Actually! podcast at the University of Chicago.
  • Conservatives, including New York Post columnist Miranda Devine and FTC Commissioner Mark Meador, have condemned Slotkin's statements.
  • Slotkin also predicted a contested 2028 Democratic presidential primary.

Who covered it

Left 7%(1)Centre 6%(1)Right 87%(13)

Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 5 of the 20 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

68/100

20 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan has suggested that Democrats should pursue prosecutions against individuals associated with a future Trump administration. Speaking at a live recording of the America, Actually! podcast at the University of Chicago, Slotkin stated that Democrats should select 'signature cases' and 'go after people and projects that are just super egregious.' She indicated this approach would create a 'deterrence message' for young people considering working for a future Trump administration, aiming to make them think twice about potential repercussions.

Slotkin, a former CIA analyst, expressed her desire for accountability regarding 'unbelievable corruption.' She also predicted a contested 2028 Democratic presidential primary, suggesting it would feature 'new faces and big and bold ideas.' When asked about her own potential candidacy, she stated she was considering it but emphasized that the mission was more important than any single individual.

Disagreement on Slotkin's remarks

Conservatives have reacted negatively to Slotkin's statements. New York Post columnist Miranda Devine called Slotkin 'a piece of work' and questioned her 'moderate' label. FTC Commissioner Mark Meador expressed disappointment that the University of Chicago would host what he described as 'dangerous rhetoric,' calling it an 'embarrassment.'

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention Senator Slotkin's prediction of a contested 2028 Democratic presidential primary.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 19 Oct 2026, 01:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • The left-rated report led on Senator Elissa Slotkin's argument that Democrats need to 'go after' Trump staffers to deter college graduates from working for a future administration. It noted her call for Democrats to pick out 'signature cases' to crack down on Trump's 'unbelievable corruption' during an event at the University of Chicago.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • The centre-rated report focused on Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin's remarks about deterring young Americans from working for the Trump administration. It stated that she told University of Chicago students Democrats would select 'signature cases' to prosecute and 'go after people and projects that are just super egregious' to send a 'deterrence message.' The report also included conservative condemnation from Miranda Devine and Mark Meador, and mentioned Slotkin's prediction of a contested 2028 Democratic primary.

Right

13 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports generally highlighted Senator Elissa Slotkin's call for Democrats to use prosecutions to make young people afraid to serve in a future Trump administration. Many reports used phrases such as 'scare off young conservatives,' 'intimidate young conservatives,' or 'coming for you' in their headlines. Several cited Slotkin's quote about wanting a 'deterrence message' and her remarks about prosecuting 'enablers' or 'Trump administration figures.' Some reports also included criticism from figures like Miranda Devine and Mark Meador, with some outlets labelling Slotkin's comments as 'actual fascism' or 'disturbing.'

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Senator Slotkin suggests prosecuting Trump aides to deter future hires?
Of the 15 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 7% are rated left, 6% are rated centre, 87% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 20. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Senator Slotkin suggests prosecuting Trump aides to deter future hires left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 87% of the 15 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
Is the coverage of Senator Slotkin suggests prosecuting Trump aides to deter future hires biased?
Senator Slotkin suggests prosecuting Trump aides to deter future hires is one event reported by 20 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Senator Slotkin suggests prosecuting Trump aides to deter future hires?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Senator Slotkin suggests prosecuting Trump aides to deter future hires?
20 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did Senator Elissa Slotkin suggest Democrats should do regarding a future Trump administration?
Senator Elissa Slotkin suggested that Democrats should select 'signature cases' to prosecute and 'go after people and projects that are just super egregious.' She stated this approach would create a 'deterrence message' to discourage young people from working for a future Trump administration.
Where did Senator Slotkin make these remarks?
Senator Slotkin made these remarks at a live recording of the America, Actually! podcast at the University of Chicago. She spoke about her views on accountability and future political landscapes during the event.
How did conservatives react to Slotkin's statements?
Conservatives condemned Slotkin's remarks. New York Post columnist Miranda Devine called her 'a piece of work,' and FTC Commissioner Mark Meador expressed disappointment, calling the rhetoric 'dangerous' and an 'embarrassment.'

Read it at the source

20 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

1

Right

13
Show 5 more

Not rated

5

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Elissa Slotkin on Trump aides | MediaBias News