Is dailymail.com biased?
Ad Fontes Media places dailymail.com in the centre. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is dailymail.com biased?
Ad Fontes Media places dailymail.com in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is dailymail.com left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places dailymail.com in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is dailymail.com reliable?
The factuality data this site ingests describes dailymail.com as mixed factuality. It reaches us without a named assessor, so it is an unattributed rating rather than our verdict. It does not guarantee that every report is correct.
What dailymail.com has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with dailymail.com’s own report linked underneath.
The Senate Homeland Security Committee voted to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination 111 times during a hearing on COVID-19 origins. The resolution, opposed by all Democrats, was sent to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for potential prosecution.
dailymail.com reported it asDr Fauci held in contempt of Congress and could be PROSECUTED (opens dailymail.com in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MediacenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Mixed factuality
The rating above reaches us without a named assessor, and is published as that rather than as anyone’s verdict.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for dailymail.com.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- dailymail.com
- Seen publishing on
- dailymail.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. dailymail.com is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of dailymail.com: its report arrived a median of 13 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 August 2026. Ratings pulled 7 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as dailymail.com, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.