Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics12 outlets ran this5 min read

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift block on mail-ballot order

Justice Department files emergency request after federal judge expands injunction to all 50 states

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift block on mail-ballot order

What this story says

  • The Trump administration filed an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme Court on 12 August 2026 to lift a nationwide injunction blocking its executive order on mail-in ballots.
  • U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani expanded her earlier injunction from 23 states to all 50 on 11 August, ruling that the federal government lacks authority to regulate elections.
  • The order directs the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters on state-approved lists and requires the Justice Department to prioritise prosecutions of officials who issue ballots to ineligible voters.
  • The Supreme Court has not yet responded to the request, which follows a separate filing in June over the same order.

Who covered it

Left 46%(5)Centre 45%(5)Right 9%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 11 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 12 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

78/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

12 sources · methodology

The Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift a nationwide injunction blocking an executive order that restricts mail-in ballots. The request, filed by the Justice Department on 12 August 2026, follows a decision by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani the day before. Talwani ruled that the federal government does not have the authority to regulate elections, a power the U.S. Constitution reserves for individual states.

The executive order, signed by President Donald Trump in March 2026, directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of eligible voters for each state and requires the U.S. Postal Service to deliver ballots only to those on state-approved mail-in lists. It also instructs the Justice Department to prioritise investigations and prosecutions of state and local election officials who issue ballots to people deemed ineligible. The administration argues that the lawsuits challenging the order are premature because no concrete actions have been taken against the plaintiffs.

Talwani’s decision on 11 August expanded an earlier injunction she issued in June, which blocked the order in 23 states and Washington, D.C. The case was brought by voting rights groups represented by the American Civil Liberties Union. The Supreme Court has not yet responded to the administration’s request to lift the June injunction or the expanded ruling.

“The executive branch of the federal government had no authority to regulate elections, a responsibility that the U.S. Constitution assigns to individual states.”

— Indira Talwani, U.S. District Judge

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mentioned the specific provisions of the executive order, such as the requirement for the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to state-approved lists or the directive for the Justice Department to prioritise prosecutions of election officials. The right-rated digest did not mention the judge’s ruling or the nationwide scope of the injunction. The centre-rated digests did not include the administration’s claim that the order is necessary to prevent voter fraud, a claim Trump has repeatedly made since his 2020 election defeat.

Tags:#USMidterms2026#MailInVoting#SupremeCourt#TrumpAdministration#ElectionLaw

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 12 Aug 2026, 21:01, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • The five left-rated digests led on the expanded scope of Talwani’s injunction, which now applies nationwide. All five noted that the Trump administration renewed its request to the Supreme Court a day after the judge’s decision. Four of the five digests included the context that the order restricts voting by mail, and three mentioned that the midterm elections in November will decide control of Congress. None of the digests quoted the administration’s argument that the lawsuits are premature.

Centre

5 rated outlets

  • The five centre-rated digests and the full report from WTVB led on the administration’s request to the Supreme Court. All five digests stated that the request aims to fully implement the executive order ahead of the November midterm elections. The WTVB report quoted the Justice Department’s argument that the lawsuits are premature because no concrete actions have been taken against the plaintiffs. Four of the five digests mentioned that the order restricts the use of mail-in ballots, and three noted that the case was brought by voting rights groups.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • The single right-rated digest from The Straits Times stated that the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene to fully implement the executive order ahead of the November midterm elections. It did not mention the expanded injunction, the judge’s ruling, or the voting rights groups that brought the case.

Read it at the source

12 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

5

Centre

5

Right

1

Not rated

1

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift block on mail-ballot…?
Of the 11 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 46% are rated left, 45% are rated centre, 9% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 12. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift block on mail-ballot… left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 11 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift block on mail-ballot… biased?
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift block on mail-ballot order is one event reported by 12 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift block on mail-ballot…?
12 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What does the Trump administration’s executive order on mail-in ballots do?
The order directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of eligible voters for each state and requires the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to those on state-approved mail-in lists. It also instructs the Justice Department to prioritise prosecutions of election officials who issue ballots to ineligible voters. The administration argues it is necessary to prevent fraud.
Why did the federal judge block the order?
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ruled that the federal government lacks authority to regulate elections, a power the U.S. Constitution reserves for individual states. She expanded an earlier injunction from 23 states to all 50 on 11 August 2026, blocking the order nationwide. The case was brought by voting rights groups.
What happens next in the Supreme Court?
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift the nationwide injunction and allow the order to take effect before the November midterm elections. The Court has not yet responded to the request, which follows a separate filing in June over the same order. It is unclear when the Court will decide.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
People arrive for immigration court hearings in New York, Monday, July 27, 2026. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)4 min readTexas firm with Trump ties declines $150m migrant children contractRead storyUS revokes 600 visas in crackdown on birth tourism networks5 min readUS revokes 600 visas in crackdown on birth tourism networksRead storyTrump administration set to spend at least $900 million on White House construction, WaPo reports5 min readTrump administration ends NOAA support for Arctic Report Card, plans $900m White House projectsRead story

Elsewhere on the site

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 15, 2026. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)Health•6 min readTrump orders split of MMR vaccine into three separate shots
How left, centre and right covered Trump mail-ballot order appeal | MediaBias News