Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics368 outlets ran this3 min read

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-ballot order

The administration is appealing a federal judge's order halting new rules for mail-in voting.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Supreme court

What this story says

  • The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on September 3, 2026, to reject a federal judge's order that halted new mail-ballot restrictions.
  • A federal judge questioned the operational status of the Postal Service's online portal for tracking mail ballots.
  • North Carolina was scheduled to begin sending mail ballots on September 5, 2026.
  • A whistleblower report warned the Postal Service's requirements could lead to millions of mail ballots not being sent.

Who covered it

Left 34%(104)Centre 48%(151)Right 18%(54)

Percentages are shares of the 309 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 59 of the 368 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

55/100

Hype

15/100

368 sources · methodology

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court on September 3, 2026, to overturn a federal judge's order that blocked new regulations for mail-in ballots. This action occurred hours after the administration could not confirm to the judge whether the Postal Service's system for tracking mail ballots was operational. North Carolina was scheduled to start sending out mail ballots on September 5, 2026, marking the beginning of a period where many states ship ballots for the approaching midterm elections.

The administration's appeal is part of a series of legal actions taken before the midterm elections in November. The new rules, stemming from an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in the spring, require the Postal Service to adhere to uniform envelope styles and for states to submit lists of eligible voters to an online portal. Ballots would not be delivered if the data on the envelopes did not match the information on the portal. U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani repeatedly questioned Department of Justice attorney Michael Velchik about the readiness of the system, noting the absence of a declaration from the Postal Service detailing its operation. Velchik argued that the primary legal question was whether the judge had the authority to block the rule.

Talwani was considering whether to extend a temporary order preventing the Postal Service from enforcing the new system until September 10. The administration had previously argued that the changes were minor and legal. However, the online portal was reportedly still inactive as of the hearing, and most election offices had already printed their envelopes and ballots. The federal government stated it was offering states the option to join the system, but no state had publicly announced its participation. A whistleblower report released that week suggested that the Postal Service's requirements, including physically bringing all ballots to post offices before mailing, could result in millions of mail ballots not being sent.

Disagreement on system readiness

The Associated Press reported that the online portal for tracking mail ballots was "apparently still inactive Thursday." In contrast, the administration argued that the Postal Service would "fully implement the rule" that it published the previous month.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated reports mentioned the whistleblower report warning that the postal system's requirements could lead to millions of mail ballots never being sent.

Tags:#MailInVoting#SupremeCourt#ElectionLaw#USPolitics#PostalService

Coverage settled. We checked this 11 times and stopped on 9 Sept 2026, 12:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

104 rated outlets

  • The left‑rated outlets reported that the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene on its mail‑ballot restrictions before the November midterm elections, after a federal judge issued an injunction. The Associated Press full report noted a Boston hearing where Judge Indira Talwani questioned the Justice Department. Digests from Bowen Island Undercurrent, thealbertan.com, Minnesota Reformer and others led on the request but omitted the hearing details.
  • The Associated Press article quoted Judge Indira Talwani saying she had no declaration from the Postal Service and described the situation as an experiment, and quoted DOJ attorney Michael Velchik referring to the “$64,000 question” of statutory authority. None of the digests from the other left outlets reproduced these quotations or the specific financial question.
  • The Texas Tribune reported that the Fifth Circuit restored several provisions of Texas’s 2021 election law, describing the ruling as a defeat of plaintiffs’ standing claims and a win for the state’s effort to prevent voter fraud. The article quoted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton calling the decision a “major victory” and included data showing a drop in mail‑ballot rejection rates after the law’s implementation.

Centre

151 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports, all digests, highlighted the Trump administration's appeal to the Supreme Court regarding mail-ballot restrictions ahead of the midterm elections. They mentioned the timing of the appeal, just before North Carolina was set to begin sending out mail ballots. The digests also noted the administration's argument that the judge lacked the legal authority to block the new rule.

Right

54 rated outlets

  • All twelve right‑rated digests report that the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene and lift a lower‑court block on its mail‑ballot executive order before the November midterm elections. They note that the request was framed as a need for swift action to allow the order’s nationwide implementation.
  • Several digests highlight U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, describing her as an Obama appointee and suggesting she was attempting to impede the administration’s effort, with language about “running out the clock.” Others point to Solicitor General John Sauer leading the petition and frame the order as a measure to protect election integrity and security.
  • None of the right‑rated digests mention any cost estimate for the proposed changes, list the specific states affected, or provide detailed excerpts from the administration’s filing. They also omit any commentary from the Supreme Court or from independent election‑security experts.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-ballot order?
Of the 309 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 34% are rated left, 48% are rated centre, 18% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 368. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-ballot order left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 309 rated outlets on this story, 34% are rated left, 48% are rated centre, 18% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-ballot order biased?
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-ballot order is one event reported by 368 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-ballot order?
368 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the Trump administration ask the Supreme Court to do?
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to reject a federal judge's order that had halted new rules regulating mail-in ballots. This appeal was made on September 3, 2026, as states prepared to send out mail ballots for the upcoming midterm elections.
What were the concerns about the mail-ballot system?
A federal judge questioned whether the Postal Service's online portal for tracking mail ballots was operational. A whistleblower report also warned that the postal system's new requirements could prevent millions of mail ballots from being sent to voters.
When was North Carolina scheduled to send out mail ballots?
North Carolina was scheduled to begin sending out mail ballots on September 5, 2026. This date was significant as it marked the start of mail ballot distribution in several states leading up to the midterm elections.

Read it at the source

442 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

141
Show 133 more

Centre

163
Show 155 more

Right

72
Show 64 more

Not rated

66
Show 58 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
Ομπάμα κατά Τραμπ για το «κυνήγι» της βουλευτή με καταγωγή από τη Σομαλία, Ιλχάν Ομάρ4 min readObama condemns federal probe into Rep. Ilhan Omar's citizenshipRead storyPresident Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally in Wasilla, Alaska, October 13, 2026.Evan Vucci/Reuters3 min readTrump's approval rating hits record low of 33%Read storyFILE – Then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump holds up his book "The Art of the Deal," given to him by a fan as he speaks during a campaign stop, Nov. 21, 2015, in Birmingham, Ala. (AP Photo/Eric Schultz, file)(AP Photo/Eric Schultz, file)4 min readDonald Trump's Dealmaking Record Shows Mixed Results, Reports SayRead story
Trump administration seeks Supreme Court reversal of mail-ballot order | MediaBias News