Trump Demands Alaska Senate Candidate Be Removed From Ballot

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump Demands Alaska Senate Candidate Be Removed From Ballot?

Of the 17 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 6% are rated left, 29% are rated centre, 65% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 25. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is Trump Demands Alaska Senate Candidate Be Removed From Ballot left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 17 rated outlets on this story, 6% are rated left, 29% are rated centre, 65% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of Trump Demands Alaska Senate Candidate Be Removed From Ballot biased?

Trump Demands Alaska Senate Candidate Be Removed From Ballot is one event reported by 25 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting Trump Demands Alaska Senate Candidate Be Removed From Ballot?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered Trump Demands Alaska Senate Candidate Be Removed From Ballot?

25 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What is the controversy surrounding the Alaska Senate race?

The controversy involves reports that individuals aligned with Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola's campaign may have helped recruit a candidate named Dan Sullivan to run against Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan. President Trump has called this 'election fraud' and demanded Peltola be removed from the ballot.

Has the Alaska Supreme Court ruled on the second Dan Sullivan's candidacy?

Yes, the Alaska Supreme Court has ruled that the second candidate named Dan Sullivan can appear on the ballot. State officials had initially sought to keep him off, arguing he was trying to confuse voters, but the court rejected that decision.

What is President Trump's stance on the situation?

President Trump has strongly condemned the alleged recruitment effort, calling it 'election fraud' and demanding that Mary Peltola should not be allowed to run. He has also suggested that the second Dan Sullivan should not be on the ballot and that legal consequences should follow.

Have Peltola's campaign or the DSCC commented on the allegations?

Yes, Peltola's campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) have issued statements denying any involvement in recruiting the second Dan Sullivan. They have stated they have no connection to either Sullivan campaign.