Skip to the story
All stories

Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election rules

President responds to suggestion he bypass Congress to enforce voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
President Donald Trump did not dismiss the idea of declaring a national security emergency around elections to impose new requirements before the midterms (Getty)

What this story says

  • Donald Trump told Wayne Allyn Root he would not dismiss declaring a national security emergency to enforce voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements for federal elections.
  • Legal experts, including the Center for American Progress, say no federal executive official has the authority to change federal election rules.
  • Trump has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that U.S. elections are vulnerable to widespread fraud, a claim courts have rejected.
  • The SAVE Act, which would impose the requirements Trump supports, has not passed Congress.

Who covered it

Left 44%(28)Centre 34%(22)Right 22%(14)

Percentages are shares of the 64 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 7 of the 71 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

54/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

35/100

71 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 14 of the 64 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

President Donald Trump did not reject the idea of declaring a national security emergency to enforce voter ID, proof-of-citizenship requirements, and restrictions on mail-in ballots for federal elections. During an interview with Wayne Allyn Root on Real America’s Voice, Root suggested Trump could bypass Congress by declaring such an emergency. Trump responded, “Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK. I’ll leave it at that.”

Root claimed a national security emergency could only be overturned by a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate. He argued that if Trump declared one within a month, it would enforce photo ID, proof of citizenship, and limits on mail-in ballots. The Center for American Progress reported in March 2026 that no federal executive official has the authority to alter federal election rules. The U.S. Constitution grants that power to Congress.

Trump has long asserted, without evidence, that U.S. elections are susceptible to widespread fraud. Courts have blocked his previous attempts to enforce similar measures, including an executive order directing states to create lists of eligible citizens for voter rolls. A federal appeals court ruled that the order involved “unprecedented levels of involvement by federal officials in how states administer elections.” The Supreme Court is currently considering whether to allow Trump to restrict mail-in voting.

What the coverage left out

No centre- or right-rated outlet ran this story at all. None of the left-rated reports mentioned that the Supreme Court is currently considering whether to allow Trump to restrict mail-in voting, though The Independent reported that the administration had asked the court to do so. The digests did not carry the detail that courts have previously blocked Trump’s attempts to enforce similar measures.

Coverage settled. We checked this 28 times and stopped on 17 Aug 2026, 07:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election rules
HuffPostLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

28 rated outlets

  • All six left-rated reports led on Trump’s refusal to dismiss the idea of declaring a national emergency to change election rules. The Independent and HuffPost, whose full reports are printed below, both quoted Trump’s remark that “stranger things have happened” and Root’s suggestion that a national emergency could bypass Congress. The Independent noted that legal experts, including the Center for American Progress, say no president has the authority to change election laws unilaterally.
  • HuffPost described Root as a “conspiracy theorist” and noted that MAGA activists have circulated a draft executive order accusing China of interfering in the 2020 election as a pretext for declaring an emergency. The outlet quoted a former Defense Department special counsel calling the plan a “madcap” scheme. The Independent and HuffPost both reported that Trump has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that elections are vulnerable to fraud.
  • The digests from Common Dreams, Raw Story, and The New Republic also carried Trump’s remark that “stranger things have happened.” Raw Story’s digest mentioned a warning from a former Trump administration official about a potential “midterm plot” involving “ballot-snatchers,” though it did not link the warning directly to the national emergency proposal. The New Republic’s digest described the plan as “dystopian.”

Centre

22 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the centre coverage of this story. The centre-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Right

14 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the right coverage of this story. The right-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election…?
Of the 64 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 44% are rated left, 34% are rated centre, 22% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 71. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 64 rated outlets on this story, 44% are rated left, 34% are rated centre, 22% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election… biased?
Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election rules is one event reported by 71 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Trump does not dismiss declaring national emergency to change election…?
71 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did Trump say about declaring a national emergency for elections?
Trump told Wayne Allyn Root he would not dismiss the idea, saying, “Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK. I’ll leave it at that.” Root had suggested Trump declare a national security emergency to enforce voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements for federal elections. Legal experts say no president has the authority to change election laws unilaterally.
Can a U.S. president change election rules without Congress?
No. The Center for American Progress reported in March 2026 that no federal executive official has the authority to alter federal election rules. The U.S. Constitution grants that power to Congress. Courts have blocked Trump’s previous attempts to enforce similar measures, including an executive order directing states to create lists of eligible citizens for voter rolls.
What is the SAVE Act?
The SAVE Act is a bill that would require Americans to prove their citizenship upon registering to vote and to show photo ID to vote in federal elections. Trump supports the bill, but it has not passed Congress. Wayne Allyn Root suggested Trump bypass Congress by declaring a national emergency to enforce its provisions.

Read it at the source

71 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

28
Show 20 more

Centre

22
Show 14 more

Right

14
Show 6 more

Not rated

7

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Trump does not dismiss declaring emergency to change election rules | MediaBias News