Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics6 outlets ran this4 min read

Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on silencers and short-barrel firearms

Rep. Andrew Clyde, who owns a Georgia gun store, called the move the largest Second Amendment win in a century

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on silencers and short-barrel firearms

What this story says

  • A district court ruled that removing the $200 tax on silencers and short-barrel firearms made the registration requirement unconstitutional.
  • The Trump administration did not appeal the ruling, allowing it to take effect without further legal challenge.
  • Rep. Andrew Clyde, who founded Clyde Armory, led the push to eliminate the tax in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year.
  • Gun violence prevention groups criticised the decision, saying it would make Americans less safe.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 17%(1)Right 83%(5)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .

Trust

54/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

30/100

6 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

A federal court ruling removed the $200 tax and registration requirements for silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns under the 1934 National Firearms Act. The Trump administration did not appeal the decision, allowing the change to take effect immediately. The ruling applies to the parties in the lawsuit and is not a nationwide injunction, as reported by the Associated Press.

The tax and registration rules were introduced in 1934. Last year, Congress reduced the tax to zero in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Gun-rights groups then argued that the registration requirement was unconstitutional without the tax. A district court agreed, and the Justice Department did not challenge the ruling.

Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Georgia Republican who founded Clyde Armory before entering Congress, called the change the "greatest restoration" of Second Amendment rights in nearly a century. He led 47 Republican lawmakers in urging Attorney General Todd Blanche not to appeal the ruling. Clyde argued that taxing a constitutional right was a way to destroy it, and that removing the tax removed the justification for registration.

Gun violence prevention groups opposed the move. Kris Brown, president of Brady: United Against Gun Violence, said the government had failed to protect public safety. She said the decision would deregulate "uniquely lethal weapons and devices" for the first time in nearly a century.

What the coverage left out

No left-rated outlet ran this story at all. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the cost of the $200 tax or that the ruling applies only to the parties in the lawsuit, not nationwide. The New York Ledger was the only outlet to report the warning from gun violence prevention groups.

Tags:#SecondAmendment#GunRights#NationalFirearmsAct#TrumpAdministration#USPolitics

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 6 times, most recently on 15 Aug 2026, 23:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • The New York Ledger led on the scale of the change, calling it the "greatest restoration" of Second Amendment rights in a century. Its report included Clyde’s argument that taxing a constitutional right was a way to destroy it, and that removing the tax removed the justification for registration. It also carried the warning from gun violence prevention groups that the decision would make Americans less safe.
  • The Ledger quoted Clyde directly: "If you can tax something legitimately, then you can actually destroy it through increased taxation. You might, quote, ‘have a right on paper,’ but you don’t really have a right because you can’t afford the right." The report also included a statement from Kris Brown, who said the government had failed to act to protect safety.

Right

5 rated outlets

  • All five right-rated digests led on the scale of the change, calling it the "greatest restoration" of Second Amendment rights in nearly a century. Four of the five digests named Clyde as the lawmaker who called it that. Three of the five mentioned that the Trump administration did not appeal the ruling, allowing it to take effect immediately.
  • None of the right-rated digests mentioned the warning from gun violence prevention groups. None carried the statement from Kris Brown or the argument that the decision would make Americans less safe. None included the detail that the ruling applies only to the parties in the lawsuit and is not a nationwide injunction.

Read it at the source

6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Centre

1

Right

5

Not rated

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on…?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 83% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on… left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on… biased?
Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on silencers and short-barrel firearms is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Trump DOJ drops appeal, ending 92-year tax and registration on…?
6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the court ruling change?
The ruling removed the $200 tax and registration requirements for silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns under the 1934 National Firearms Act. The change took effect after the Trump administration did not appeal. It applies only to the parties in the lawsuit, not nationwide.
Who led the push to remove the tax?
Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Georgia Republican who founded Clyde Armory, led the push to eliminate the $200 tax in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year. He called the ruling the greatest restoration of Second Amendment rights in nearly a century.
What did gun violence prevention groups say?
Gun violence prevention groups criticised the decision. Kris Brown, president of Brady: United Against Gun Violence, said the government had failed to protect public safety and that the ruling would deregulate "uniquely lethal weapons and devices" for the first time in nearly a century.
Which outlets covered the story?
The New York Ledger, rated centre, ran a full report. Five right-rated outlets ran digests: Bizpac Review, American Wire News, Democratic Accent, Fox News and USSANews. No left-rated outlet ran the story at all.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
AP Photo/Lisa Marie Pane4 min readGun Owners of America members buy unregistered suppressors after DOJ misses appeal deadlineRead storyTexas court ruling deregulates silencers and short-barrelled firearms after Justice Department misses deadline3 min readTexas court ruling deregulates silencers and short-barrelled firearms after Justice Department misses deadlineRead storyHealth Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has revealed that President Donald Trump has 'boxes and boxes of McDonald’s' on his plane (Donald Trump Jr. via X)4 min readTrump’s fast-food habit on flights revealed by health secretary KennedyRead story
Court ends $200 tax on silencers and short-barrel firearms | MediaBias News