Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics32 outlets ran this3 min read

Trump seeks control over US health research funding

White House considers external commission to validate NIH grants, sparking concern.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Des chercheurs américains ont annoncé mi-septembre poursuivre en justice le NIH qu’ils accusent d’avoir bloqué l’octroi de subventions à des fins de censure de recherches ayant trait à la diversité, l’identité de genre ou encore le changement climatique. © Crédit photo : MANDEL NGAN / AFP

What this story says

  • Donald Trump is seeking to gain control over US health research funding.
  • The White House is reportedly considering an external commission to validate grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
  • This measure is viewed as part of a wider effort to counter 'woke' programs and institutions.
  • Researchers have expressed concerns that such a commission could slow or halt medical progress.

Who covered it

Left 33%(7)Centre 48%(10)Right 19%(4)

Percentages are shares of the 21 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 11 of the 32 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

45/100

Hype

41/100

32 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 7 of the 21 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Donald Trump is reportedly seeking to take control of funding for US health research. According to US media reports over the weekend, the White House is considering the creation of an external commission. This body would be tasked with validating grants awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

This proposed measure is seen as part of a broader effort to crack down on what are described as 'woke' programs and institutions. Some reports indicate that since returning to power, Trump has significantly reduced federal funding for research, particularly in biomedicine.

Disagreement on commission's purpose

While some reports state the commission would be capable of rejecting projects it deems inconsistent with Republican ideas or Trump's views, others focus on its role in validating grants. The White House budget director, Russ Vought, is cited as having justified the measure by accusing the NIH of funding projects opposed to Trump's values, as reported by the Washington Post.

What the coverage left out

None of the centre or right-rated reports mention the lawsuit filed by researchers against the NIH alleging censorship of research on diversity, gender identity, and climate change, nor do they include the specific example of Ann Cohen, an associate professor whose funding for Alzheimer's research was cut.

Tags:#DonaldTrump#USPolitics#BiomedicalResearch#NIH#Woke

Coverage settled. We checked this 12 times and stopped on 26 Sept 2026, 21:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Donaldas Trumpas / / AP
15min.ltCentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

7 rated outlets

  • The Washington Post digest said political officials were weighing a commission to review NIH award decisions. PBS NewsHour noted Senators Susan Collins and Patty Murray opposed the Trump administration’s plan to give the White House control of NIH grant funding. Semafor reported Collins has resisted NIH funding cuts since Trump’s second term began. Scientific American recorded that advocates and scientists warned the proposal could upend U.S. science.
  • The digests identified the voices of two Republican senators, Susan Collins and Patty Murray, as opponents of the proposal. Scientific American’s summary highlighted comments from unnamed advocates and scientists warning of scientific disruption. Semafor’s note referenced Collins’s personal role in opposing funding cuts, while the Washington Post piece focused on unnamed political officials considering the commission.
  • None of the four digests included a cost estimate for the proposed commission or details about its membership. They also omitted any statement from the White House or the Trump administration explaining the rationale for the plan. No digest provided information on how the commission would operate or its timeline.

Centre

10 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports led on Donald Trump's reported efforts to gain greater control over US health research funding. Sud Ouest and 15min.lt, in their full reports, highlighted the White House's consideration of an external commission to validate NIH grants. LRT's digest also stated that Trump seeks tighter control as part of a crackdown on 'woke' programs. Sud Ouest included a quote from Russ Paulsen, president of Research! America, who warned that adding more bureaucrats would 'considerably slow down medical progress, to the point of paralyzing it'.

Right

4 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports focused on Trump's reported intention to further tighten his grip on biomedical research. Arab News, The Straits Times, and Free Malaysia Today News all used similar phrasing in their headlines and digests, indicating Trump's desire to control health research funding as part of his campaign against 'woke' programmes. Arab News and The Straits Times also noted that since returning to power in early 2025, Trump has drastically cut federal funding for research, particularly in biomedicine.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump seeks control over US health research funding?
Of the 21 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 33% are rated left, 48% are rated centre, 19% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 32. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Trump seeks control over US health research funding left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 21 rated outlets on this story, 33% are rated left, 48% are rated centre, 19% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Trump seeks control over US health research funding biased?
Trump seeks control over US health research funding is one event reported by 32 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Trump seeks control over US health research funding?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Trump seeks control over US health research funding?
32 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is Donald Trump reportedly seeking to do with US health research funding?
Donald Trump is reportedly seeking to take control of funding for US health research. The White House is considering creating an external commission to validate grants awarded by the NIH, a move seen as part of a crackdown on 'woke' programs.
What is the proposed external commission intended to do?
The White House is reportedly considering an external commission to validate grants from the NIH. This body would have the power to reject projects it deems inconsistent with Republican ideas or Trump's views, according to some reports.
Why is this measure being considered?
This measure is seen as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to crack down on 'woke' programs and institutions. The White House budget director is cited as accusing the NIH of funding projects opposed to Trump's values.

Read it at the source

32 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

7

Centre

10
Show 2 more

Right

4

Not rated

11
Show 3 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
Flávio Bolsonaro desembarca de avião3 min readFlávio Bolsonaro claims solo exit from Brazil, US sources cite TrumpRead storyWhite House Denies Hegseth and Rubio Resignations3 min readWhite House Denies Hegseth and Rubio ResignationsRead storyJD Vance Blames Iran War for Midterm Losses, Splits with Trump4 min readJD Vance Blames Iran War for Midterm Losses, Splits with TrumpRead story
Trump and US health research funding | MediaBias News