Protect Our Care media bias and reliability
Protect Our Care is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 8 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Protect Our Care biased?
Protect Our Care is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Protect Our Care left or right?
Protect Our Care is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Protect Our Care reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Protect Our Care. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Protect Our Care has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Protect Our Care’s own report linked underneath.
Dr. Heidi Overton, President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Food and Drug Administration, is scheduled for a Senate confirmation hearing. Lawmakers are expected to focus on her positions regarding vaccines and the abortion pill mifepristone.
Protect Our Care reported it asOverton Hearing Watch: Trump’s Pro-Glyphosate, Anti-Vax FDA Pick Has Explaining to Do (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
Donald Trump is reportedly seeking to exert greater control over US health research funding. The White House is considering an external commission to validate grants, a move seen as part of a broader crackdown on 'woke' programs.
Protect Our Care reported it asTrump Demands Life-Saving NIH Grants Be Held Political Hostage (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the vaccine-skeptic group Children's Health Defense that they have a "friend in the White House" in President Donald Trump. Kennedy delivered the keynote address at a conference hosted by the group in Washington, D.C.
Protect Our Care reported it as#1 Anti-Vax Propaganda Group Has “Friend at the White House”, RFK Jr Declares: Public Health Project Newsletter (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
Confidential deals struck by the Trump administration with pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Eli Lilly included provisions that encouraged higher drug prices overseas and offered protection from tariffs. Documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act lawsuits revealed these terms, alongside broad confidentiality pledges from the Health and Human Services Department.
Protect Our Care reported it asCONFIRMED: Trump’s Secret Deals Pad the Pockets of Big Drug Companies While Raising Costs for Seniors (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has excluded two measles-associated deaths reported by Pennsylvania from its latest weekly update. The agency stated the decision was made pending further investigation into the cause of the deaths.
Protect Our Care reported it asHow Predictable: “Without Objection”, New CDC Director Followed RFK Jr’s Order to Meddle With PA Measles Death Reporting (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has excluded two measles-associated deaths reported by Pennsylvania from its latest weekly update. The agency stated the decision was made pending further investigation into the cause of the deaths.
Protect Our Care reported it asIn “Highly Unusual” Order on Measles Deaths, CDC Director Schwartz Caves to Trump-RFK Jr Anti-Vax Agenda (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
New documents obtained by the Associated Press and The Guardian appear to contradict statements made by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regarding his 2019 visit to Samoa. Kennedy had told lawmakers the trip was unrelated to vaccines, but a letter he sent mentions vaccines eight times.
Protect Our Care reported it asRFK Jr. Exposed! New Reporting Reveals His Bald-Faced Lies During Senate Confirmation Hearing (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on 11 August 2026 recommending U.S. children receive fewer vaccinations, while reviving debunked claims linking vaccines to autism. The CDC and multiple studies involving over 5.6 million people have found no such link. No right-rated U.S. outlet covered the story.
Protect Our Care reported it asJury Is In On Trump’s Anti-Vax Executive Order: Dangerous, Costly & Needless (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on 10 August 2026 to separate the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine into three individual shots and reduce the number of recommended childhood vaccines from 18 to 11. The order advises states with school vaccine mandates to consider updating their laws, though states retain authority over vaccination requirements.
Protect Our Care reported it asTrump Executive Order on Non-Existent Autism-Vaccine Link Will Get Kids Killed (opens Protect Our Care in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Protect Our Care. We asked on 9 September 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Protect Our Care.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- protectourcare.org
- Seen publishing on
- protectourcare.org
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 8
- Reports listed
- 9
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 6 August 2026
9 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Protect Our Care has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 8 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, we logged no report earlier than Protect Our Care’s on 1 of them. Overall it filed a median of 20 hours after the earliest report we logged.
Measured 25 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 25 September 2026. Ratings pulled 9 September 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Protect Our Care publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.