Skip to the story
All stories

Senate committee advances Nicole Saphier's surgeon general nomination

The HELP committee voted 12-11 to advance the nomination of Dr. Nicole Saphier.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated

What this story says

  • Dr. Nicole Saphier's nomination for surgeon general has moved forward after a Senate committee vote.
  • The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions voted 12 to 11 to advance her nomination.
  • Saphier stated she does not believe childhood vaccines cause autism and called the MMR vaccine a key tool against measles.
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders indicated he would vote against the nomination, citing Saphier's past questioning of the hepatitis B vaccine at birth.

Who covered it

Left 37%(15)Centre 39%(16)Right 24%(10)

Percentages are shares of the 41 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 5 of the 46 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

60/100

Hype

20/100

46 sources · methodology

Dr. Nicole Saphier's nomination for surgeon general advanced from a Senate committee on Wednesday. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions voted 12 to 11 to move her nomination forward. Saphier, a radiologist and former Fox News Channel contributor, faced questions during her confirmation hearing regarding her views on vaccines.

During the hearing, Saphier stated that she does not believe childhood vaccines cause autism. She also said that the MMR vaccine is the greatest tool for combating measles infections. Sen. Bernie Sanders, the ranking member of the committee, announced he would vote against Saphier's nomination. Sanders cited Saphier's past questioning of the necessity of the hepatitis B vaccine at birth as a reason for his opposition.

Disagreement on hepatitis B vaccine stance

The Independent reported that Sen. Bernie Sanders stated Saphier "has questioned the need for the hepatitis B vaccine at birth." In contrast, The Independent also reported that Saphier stated at her confirmation hearing that the universal birth dose of hepatitis B was safe and effective.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the 12-11 vote count for advancing Dr. Nicole Saphier's nomination. None of the centre-rated digests mention Sen. Bernie Sanders' specific reason for voting against the nomination. None of the right-rated digests mention Dr. Nicole Saphier's statement that she does not believe childhood vaccines cause autism.

Coverage settled. We checked this 9 times and stopped on 6 Oct 2026, 03:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Nicole Saphier testifies before senators on Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2026. Eric Lee/The Washington Post via Getty Images
CBS NewsCentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

15 rated outlets

  • The Independent's full report stated that the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions advanced Nicole Saphier's nomination by a 12 to 11 vote. The report noted her stance on childhood vaccines, stating she told lawmakers she did not believe they cause autism.
  • The Independent's report also detailed concerns raised by Senator Bernie Sanders, who said he would vote against her nomination. Sanders cited Saphier's questioning of the need for the hepatitis B vaccine at birth.
  • Ten other left-rated outlets reported that the Senate committee advanced Saphier's nomination. These digests did not include details about her vaccine stance or specific concerns raised by senators.

Centre

16 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports from CBS News, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, WBAL, Washington Top News, Winnipeg Free Press, The Record, WKMG, and Political Wire focused on the advancement of Dr. Nicole Saphier's nomination for surgeon general by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. These digests noted the 12-11 party-line vote. CBS News' full report included President Trump's description of Saphier as a "STAR physician" and "an INCREDIBLE COMMUNICATOR." It also detailed Sen. Bill Cassidy's support for Saphier, citing her statements on vaccine safety, and mentioned that Saphier's nomination followed the withdrawal of another nominee, Casey Means. The digests generally stated Saphier's background as a radiologist and former Fox News contributor.

Right

10 rated outlets

  • The right-rated report from the Washington Examiner focused on President Donald Trump’s nominee for surgeon general, Nicole Saphier, being approved by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The digest stated that Saphier convinced key Republican senators of her support for childhood vaccines, a position that puts her at odds with other parts of the Trump political coalition. It also noted her profession as a radiologist specializing in breast cancer.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Senate committee advances Nicole Saphier's surgeon general nomination?
Of the 41 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 37% are rated left, 39% are rated centre, 24% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 46. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Senate committee advances Nicole Saphier's surgeon general nomination left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 41 rated outlets on this story, 37% are rated left, 39% are rated centre, 24% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Senate committee advances Nicole Saphier's surgeon general nomination biased?
Senate committee advances Nicole Saphier's surgeon general nomination is one event reported by 46 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Senate committee advances Nicole Saphier's surgeon general nomination?
46 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What was the vote count for Dr. Nicole Saphier's nomination?
The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions voted 12 to 11 to advance Dr. Nicole Saphier's nomination for surgeon general. This vote count was reported by The Independent and CBS News.
What did Dr. Nicole Saphier say about vaccines?
Dr. Nicole Saphier stated that she does not believe childhood vaccines cause autism. She also said that the MMR vaccine is the greatest tool for combating measles infections. She also stated that the universal birth dose of hepatitis B was safe and effective.
Why did Senator Bernie Sanders oppose the nomination?
Senator Bernie Sanders stated he would vote against Dr. Nicole Saphier's nomination because she has questioned the need for the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. He also said the nation needs a surgeon general who will tell the truth about vaccines.

Read it at the source

46 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

15
Show 7 more

Centre

16
Show 8 more

Right

10
Show 2 more

Not rated

5

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Saphier Nomination Advances | MediaBias News