Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species rule changes
Two lawsuits filed on 9 September challenge rules narrowing the definition of harm and limiting protections for newly threatened species
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species rule changes
Photograph: Star Advertiser (embedded from source)
What this story says
- U.S. states and the District of Columbia filed two lawsuits on 9 September 2026 challenging Trump administration rules that weaken the Endangered Species Act.
- The lawsuits target a rule that narrows the definition of harm and a pair of rules that limit protections for newly threatened species.
- Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and New York Attorney General Letitia James publicly opposed the rule changes.
- Most reports say twenty states and the District of Columbia are plaintiffs, while one report notes Hawaii joining a coalition of nineteen states.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 98 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 12 of the 110 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
76/100
Craft
79/100
Hype
30/100
110 sources · methodology
Missing from the right
Only 13 of the 98 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
On 9 September 2026, twenty U.S. states and the District of Columbia filed two separate lawsuits against the Trump administration. The suits allege that recent federal rules illegally weaken the Endangered Species Act, a law that has protected species such as the bald eagle and the Hawaiian monk seal.
One lawsuit challenges a rule that narrows the Act’s definition of "harm" so that activities like oil drilling or mining may proceed in habitat areas as long as they do not directly kill or injure an animal. The second lawsuit attacks two rules: one that removes broad protections for newly threatened species unless the Fish and Wildlife Service creates species‑specific safeguards, and another that forces the agency to consider objections from developers and other businesses before designating critical habitat.
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and New York Attorney General Letitia James issued statements condemning the changes. Brown said the administration is undermining a law supported by the public, while James called for a future where wildlife can thrive.
“The Trump administration is trying to undermine the law, the will of Congress and the will of the people who overwhelmingly support protections for endangered species.”
20
states joining the lawsuits
plus the District of Columbia
Number of states joining the lawsuits
The Star Advertiser’s full report says Hawaii joined a coalition of nineteen states, while most other digests state that twenty states and the District of Columbia are plaintiffs. The Star Advertiser article also notes that Democratic attorneys general of twenty states and the District of Columbia joined one or both cases.
What the coverage left out
None of the right‑rated digests mention the statements from Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and New York Attorney General Letitia James. The left‑rated digests do not mention Hawaii’s specific involvement in the coalition.
Coverage settled. We checked this 16 times and stopped on 15 Sept 2026, 08:15. The figures above are what it finished at.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
40 rated outlets
- All twelve left‑rated outlets reported that a coalition of twenty U.S. states and the District of Columbia filed two lawsuits on Wednesday challenging the Trump administration’s rollbacks of endangered‑species protections. Each digest noted that the suits seek to restore rules that protect habitats of threatened wildlife.
- Al Jazeera’s full report added that Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown said the administration was undermining the law and public support for species protection, while California Attorney General Rob Bonta criticised the president’s focus on industry. The article explained that the new rule narrows the 1973 Act’s definition of “harm”, potentially allowing mining and oil drilling in sensitive habitats, and noted that environmental groups have filed parallel lawsuits.
- The digests omitted the attorneys‑general quotations, the discussion of how the rule narrows the Act’s “harm” definition, and the reference to possible mining or oil drilling in protected areas. They also left out mention of parallel lawsuits by environmental groups and the Interior Department’s claim that the suits target regulatory overreach.
Centre
45 rated outlets
- The twelve centre‑rated reports, including the Star Advertiser’s full article, focused on the specific rules being challenged: the narrowed definition of harm and the removal of broad protections for newly threatened species. They quoted Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and New York Attorney General Letitia James, and listed the lead states, Washington, California, Maryland and Massachusetts, that are co‑leading the suits. Several centre digests also noted Hawaii’s participation, echoing the headline that Hawaii joins nineteen states.
Right
13 rated outlets
- The single right‑rated digest, based on a Reuters wire, emphasised that U.S. states filed two lawsuits accusing the Trump administration of illegally weakening the Endangered Species Act. It framed the action as a legal challenge to federal rule changes without mentioning the number of states involved or the statements from the two attorneys general.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species…?
- Of the 98 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 33% are rated left, 59% are rated centre, 8% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 110. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 98 rated outlets on this story, 33% are rated left, 59% are rated centre, 8% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species… biased?
- Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species rule changes is one event reported by 110 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Twenty states and D.C. sue Trump administration over endangered species…?
- 110 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- How many lawsuits were filed and when?
- Two lawsuits were filed on 9 September 2026 by a coalition of twenty states and the District of Columbia, challenging Trump administration rules that weaken the Endangered Species Act.
- What specific rules are being challenged?
- The suits target a rule that narrows the definition of harm, a rule that removes broad protections for newly threatened species unless species‑specific safeguards are created, and a rule that forces the agency to consider business objections before designating critical habitat.
- Which officials spoke against the rule changes?
- Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and New York Attorney General Letitia James issued public statements condemning the rule changes, saying they undermine the law and threaten wildlife.
- Did all reports agree on the number of states involved?
- No. The Star Advertiser’s full article says Hawaii joined a coalition of nineteen states, while most other digests state that twenty states and the District of Columbia are plaintiffs.
Read it at the source
110 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
40- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens New Jersey Monitor in a new tab)
New Jersey Monitor — is New Jersey Monitor biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Ohio Capital Journal in a new tab)
Ohio Capital Journal — is Ohio Capital Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Colorado Newsline in a new tab)
Colorado Newsline — is Colorado Newsline biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump's changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Newsday in a new tab)
- Washington, Oregon sue to prevent federal changes that would undercut Endangered Species Act (opens OPB in a new tab)
- Twenty States Sue Trump for Animal Protection Cuts (opens Il Fatto Quotidiano in a new tab)
Il Fatto Quotidiano — is Il Fatto Quotidiano biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Florida Phoenix in a new tab)
Florida Phoenix — is Florida Phoenix biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens alabamareflector.com in a new tab)
alabamareflector.com — is alabamareflector.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 32 more
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Iowa Capital Dispatch in a new tab)
Iowa Capital Dispatch — is Iowa Capital Dispatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Record and Landmark in a new tab)
Record and Landmark — is Record and Landmark biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Dothan Eagle in a new tab)
Dothan Eagle — is Dothan Eagle biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Tucson in a new tab)
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Missouri Independent in a new tab)
Missouri Independent — is Missouri Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Michigan Advance in a new tab)
Michigan Advance — is Michigan Advance biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens The Almanac in a new tab)
The Almanac — is The Almanac biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Palo Alto Online in a new tab)
Palo Alto Online — is Palo Alto Online biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump's changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Cal Matters in a new tab)
Cal Matters — is Cal Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Pennsylvania Capital-Star in a new tab)
Pennsylvania Capital-Star — is Pennsylvania Capital-Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections (opens Hawaii Tribune-Herald in a new tab)
Hawaii Tribune-Herald — is Hawaii Tribune-Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Louisiana Illuminator in a new tab)
Louisiana Illuminator — is Louisiana Illuminator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CT Joins Lawsuits Against Trump Administration Over Reductions In Endangered Species Protections (opens CTNewsJunkie.com in a new tab)
CTNewsJunkie.com — is CTNewsJunkie.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections (opens CNN in a new tab)
- US states sue Trump over weakening of endangered species protections (opens Al Jazeera in a new tab)
Al Jazeera — is Al Jazeera biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Idaho Capital Sun in a new tab)
Idaho Capital Sun — is Idaho Capital Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens South Dakota Searchlight in a new tab)
South Dakota Searchlight — is South Dakota Searchlight biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens arkansasadvocate.com in a new tab)
arkansasadvocate.com — is arkansasadvocate.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- WA, other states sue feds over endangered species rollbacks • Washington State Standard (opens washingtonstatestandard.com in a new tab)
washingtonstatestandard.com — is washingtonstatestandard.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Oregon Capital Chronicle in a new tab)
Oregon Capital Chronicle — is Oregon Capital Chronicle biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Source New Mexico in a new tab)
Source New Mexico — is Source New Mexico biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Stateline in a new tab)
- Colorado joins lawsuit challenging changes to Endangered Species Act (opens Colorado Politics in a new tab)
Colorado Politics — is Colorado Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Washington state sues over federal endangered species rule change (opens Lodinews.com in a new tab)
Lodinews.com — is Lodinews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oregon sues Trump administration for weakening wildlife protections (opens The Register-Guard in a new tab)
The Register-Guard — is The Register-Guard biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oregon sues Trump administration for weakening wildlife protections (opens USA Today in a new tab)
- WA sues over federal endangered species rule change (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Hawaii joins 19 states suing Trump over endangered species rules | Honolulu Star-Advertiser (opens Star Advertiser in a new tab)
Star Advertiser — is Star Advertiser biased? Our profile of this outlet
- New Washington lawsuit alleges federal government weakening protections for endangered species (opens The spokesman-Review in a new tab)
The spokesman-Review — is The spokesman-Review biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Wisconsin Examiner in a new tab)
Wisconsin Examiner — is Wisconsin Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
45- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens My Mother Lode in a new tab)
My Mother Lode — is My Mother Lode biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat – WTOP News (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Michigan joins fight over Trump rollback of endangered species rules (opens Michigan Live in a new tab)
Michigan Live — is Michigan Live biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Weiser joins lawsuits against rollback of Endangered Species Act protections (opens Montrose Daily Press in a new tab)
Montrose Daily Press — is Montrose Daily Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Washington state, other states sue feds over endangered species rollbacks - The Daily Chronicle (opens The Chronicle in a new tab)
The Chronicle — is The Chronicle biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Washington state, other states sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Nisqually Valley News in a new tab)
Nisqually Valley News — is Nisqually Valley News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens The CT Mirror in a new tab)
The CT Mirror — is The CT Mirror biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 37 more
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Mooresville Tribune in a new tab)
Mooresville Tribune — is Mooresville Tribune biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens The News Virginian in a new tab)
The News Virginian — is The News Virginian biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Hickory Daily Record in a new tab)
Hickory Daily Record — is Hickory Daily Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Muscatine Journal in a new tab)
Muscatine Journal — is Muscatine Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Beatrice Daily Sun in a new tab)
Beatrice Daily Sun — is Beatrice Daily Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Lake Geneva News in a new tab)
Lake Geneva News — is Lake Geneva News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens The Times and Democrat in a new tab)
The Times and Democrat — is The Times and Democrat biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Martinsville Bulletin in a new tab)
Martinsville Bulletin — is Martinsville Bulletin biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Bristol Herald Courier in a new tab)
Bristol Herald Courier — is Bristol Herald Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Roanoke Times in a new tab)
Roanoke Times — is Roanoke Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens The Valley News Today in a new tab)
The Valley News Today — is The Valley News Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Bismarck Tribune in a new tab)
Bismarck Tribune — is Bismarck Tribune biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens The Daily Progress in a new tab)
The Daily Progress — is The Daily Progress biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Bulletin-Review in a new tab)
Bulletin-Review — is Bulletin-Review biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Danville Register & Bee in a new tab)
Danville Register & Bee — is Danville Register & Bee biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens The McDowell News in a new tab)
The McDowell News — is The McDowell News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Missoulian in a new tab)
Missoulian — is Missoulian biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Danville San Ramon in a new tab)
Danville San Ramon — is Danville San Ramon biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States file lawsuits over weakened Species Act (opens fredericksburg.com in a new tab)
fredericksburg.com — is fredericksburg.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States file lawsuits over weakened Species Act (opens The Press of Atlantic City in a new tab)
The Press of Atlantic City — is The Press of Atlantic City biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections (opens West Hawaii Today in a new tab)
West Hawaii Today — is West Hawaii Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Attorney General Raoul Challenges Trump Administration’s Rollbacks Of Endangered Species Act Regulations (opens RiverBender.com in a new tab)
RiverBender.com — is RiverBender.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'Oregon will continue to fight back': States sue to stop changes to Endangered Species Act (opens KOIN 6 in a new tab)
- Attorneys general coalition sues Trump admin over Endangered Species Act (opens Spectrum News in a new tab)
Spectrum News — is Spectrum News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Washington AG sues Fish and Wildlife Service for changing the Environmental Protection Act (opens ABC FOX Montana in a new tab)
ABC FOX Montana — is ABC FOX Montana biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Donald Trump Administration Hit With 2 Major Lawsuits From 20 States (opens Reality Tea in a new tab)
Reality Tea — is Reality Tea biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Attorneys general coalition sues Trump admin over Endangered Species Act (opens Spectrum News 13 in a new tab)
Spectrum News 13 — is Spectrum News 13 biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Attorneys general coalition sues Trump admin over Endangered Species Act (opens Bay News 9 in a new tab)
Bay News 9 — is Bay News 9 biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Weiser joins lawsuits against rollback of Endangered Species Act protections (opens The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel in a new tab)
- Oregon sues Trump administration for weakening wildlife protections (opens Statesman Journal in a new tab)
Statesman Journal — is Statesman Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Washington co-leads two lawsuits challenging cuts to federal Endangered Species Act protections (opens Krem2 News in a new tab)
Krem2 News — is Krem2 News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Donald Trump Administration Hit With 2 Major Lawsuits From 20 States (opens Mandatory in a new tab)
- US states sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections (opens WTVB in a new tab)
- Washington sues over federal endangered species rule change (opens The Columbian in a new tab)
The Columbian — is The Columbian biased? Our profile of this outlet
- WA sues to prevent federal changes that would undercut Endangered Species Act (opens KUOW in a new tab)
- Attorneys general sue over changes to Endangered Species Act (opens Courthouse News Service in a new tab)
Courthouse News Service — is Courthouse News Service biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections (opens Reuters in a new tab)
Right
13- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Jonesboro Sun in a new tab)
Jonesboro Sun — is Jonesboro Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Illinois Quick Hits: State joins suit against threatened species rule rollback (opens The Center Square in a new tab)
The Center Square — is The Center Square biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue over changes to wildlife protections (opens Omaha World-Herald in a new tab)
Omaha World-Herald — is Omaha World-Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States file lawsuits over weakened Species Act (opens The Billings Gazette in a new tab)
The Billings Gazette — is The Billings Gazette biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Michigan AG Joins Multi-State Lawsuits Against Federal Endangered Species Act Changes (opens The Free Press (Tampa) in a new tab)
The Free Press (Tampa) — is The Free Press (Tampa) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States file lawsuits over weakened Species Act (opens Richmond Times-Dispatch in a new tab)
Richmond Times-Dispatch — is Richmond Times-Dispatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Democrats Sue the Trump Administration for Non-Compliance with the Endangered Species Law (opens Interfax.ru in a new tab)
Interfax.ru — is Interfax.ru biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Twenty States Are Suing Trump over the Weakening of Laws Protecting Endangered Animals. (opens thairath.co.th in a new tab)
thairath.co.th — is thairath.co.th biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 5 more
- 'Exploitation': WA joins lawsuit to block Trump admin. from gutting Endangered Species Act (opens MY Northwest in a new tab)
MY Northwest — is MY Northwest biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US states sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections - Regional Media News (opens regionalmedianews.com in a new tab)
regionalmedianews.com — is regionalmedianews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections (opens New Hampshire Union Leader in a new tab)
New Hampshire Union Leader — is New Hampshire Union Leader biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Washington AG leads lawsuits to block federally-weakened Endangered Species Act rules (opens Komo News in a new tab)
- Washington AG leads lawsuits to block federally-weakened Endangered Species Act rules (opens KATU in a new tab)
Not rated
12- US States Sue Trump Administration for Weakening Protections for Endangered Species (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
Ekolist.cz — is Ekolist.cz biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue feds over endangered species rollbacks (opens Dailyfly in a new tab)
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens livermorevine.com in a new tab)
livermorevine.com — is livermorevine.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens pleasantonweekly.com in a new tab)
pleasantonweekly.com — is pleasantonweekly.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Redwood City Pulse in a new tab)
Redwood City Pulse — is Redwood City Pulse biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California sues over Trump’s changes to Endangered Species Act, arguing they threaten habitat (opens Mountain View Voice in a new tab)
Mountain View Voice — is Mountain View Voice biased? Our profile of this outlet
- U.S. States File Two Lawsuits Against Trump Administration for Allegedly Weakening the Federal Endangered Species Act (opens News.law in a new tab)
- Attorneys general sue over changes to Endangered Species Act (opens Missoula Current in a new tab)
Missoula Current — is Missoula Current biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 4 more
- AG Campbell challenges Trump Administration’s rollbacks of Endangered Species Act regulations (opens statehousenews.com in a new tab)
statehousenews.com — is statehousenews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California Sues Over Endangered Species Act Rollbacks (opens Hoodline in a new tab)
- States Challenge Trump Administration Over Endangered Species Act Changes (opens Devdiscourse in a new tab)
Devdiscourse — is Devdiscourse biased? Our profile of this outlet
- States sue Trump admin. over rollback of endangered species protections (opens The San Joaquin Valley Sun in a new tab)
The San Joaquin Valley Sun — is The San Joaquin Valley Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


