Ekolist.cz media bias and reliability
Ekolist.cz is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 8 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Ekolist.cz biased?
Ekolist.cz is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Ekolist.cz left or right?
Ekolist.cz is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Ekolist.cz reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Ekolist.cz. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Ekolist.cz has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Ekolist.cz’s own report linked underneath.
Donald Trump has suggested renaming either the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean, proposing names such as 'Trump Ocean' or 'Ocean of the Americas.' He also stated he would not rename the Hudson or Mississippi rivers.
Ekolist.cz reported it asTrump Proposed Renaming One of the Oceans to Trump or Ocean of the Americas (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
Finland's Supervisory Authority LVV has ordered Google's subsidiary Tuike Finland to immediately suspend preparatory work on data centres in Muhos and Kajaani. The decision comes amid suspicions of illegal logging and significant environmental changes at the construction sites, pending environmental impact assessments.
Ekolist.cz reported it asFinnish Authorities Order Suspension of Google Data Center Construction (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
The Triglav Glacier in Slovenia is expected to disappear within days due to accelerating climate change and unusually early snowmelt. Once covering 14 hectares in 1946, its rapid melting could impact water availability in the Dráva and Mura river basins.
Ekolist.cz reported it asSlovenia's Triglav Glacier Could Completely Disappear Within Days (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
Swiss glaciers lost 5.5% of their ice volume in 2026, the second-largest annual percentage drop recorded. Over the past five years, nearly a fifth of the country's glacier ice has vanished, primarily due to heat waves and insufficient winter snowfall.
Ekolist.cz reported it asThis Year Has Been Devastating for Swiss Glaciers, Says Scientific Report (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
Two giant pandas, Ping Ping and Fu Shuang, have arrived in Atlanta from China on a 10-year loan to Zoo Atlanta. Their arrival follows Chinese leader Xi Jinping's state visit to Washington.
Ekolist.cz reported it asChina Sends Giant Pandas to the United States (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
On 9 September 2026, a coalition of twenty U.S. states and the District of Columbia filed two lawsuits accusing the Trump administration of illegally weakening the Endangered Species Act. The suits target rules that narrow habitat protections and reduce safeguards for newly threatened species.
Ekolist.cz reported it asUS States Sue Trump Administration for Weakening Protections for Endangered Species (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
August 2026 was the hottest month on record globally, tying with July 2023, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service. The record heat was attributed to human-caused climate change and a strong El Niño event, with sea surface temperatures also reaching new highs.
Ekolist.cz reported it asCopernicus: August 2026 Was the Warmest August in the History of Measurements (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
A federal judge has blocked New York's law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay $75 billion over 25 years for climate change damages. The judge found the state law conflicted with federal authority, particularly the Clean Air Act.
Ekolist.cz reported it asUS Judge Blocks New York State Climate Fund Bill (opens Ekolist.cz in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Ekolist.cz. We asked on 2 October 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Ekolist.cz.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Czechia
- Official site
- ekolist.cz
- Seen publishing on
- ekolist.cz
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 8
- Reports listed
- 8
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 2 September 2026
8 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Ekolist.cz has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 8 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Ekolist.cz: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 18 October 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 16 October 2026. Ratings pulled 2 October 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Ekolist.cz publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.