US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies
New guidance ends Obama-era rules treating racial disparities in suspensions as potential discrimination
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies
Photograph: Education Week (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The US Department of Education issued new guidance on 19 August 2026 directing schools to apply discipline policies without considering race.
- The guidance ends Obama-era rules that treated racial disparities in student discipline as potential civil rights violations under Title VI.
- The Department opened Title VI civil rights investigations into school districts in Fayetteville, Arkansas, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
- No left-rated outlet reported on the guidance, according to the digests available.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 12 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
78/100
Craft
72/100
Hype
15/100
12 sources · methodology
Thin on the left so far
None of the 12 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
On 19 August 2026, the US Department of Education issued new guidance to schools receiving federal funds. The guidance directs schools to apply student discipline policies without regard to race. It ends prior approaches that treated statistical disparities in discipline as potential civil rights violations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The guidance was communicated through a “Dear Colleague” letter, as reported by K-12 Dive. The Department also opened Title VI civil rights investigations into school districts in Fayetteville, Arkansas, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The investigations allege that administrators directed staff to factor race into disciplinary decisions, according to American Faith.
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said on X that “For too long, the left’s pursuit of ‘equity’ has perversely required schools to discriminate on the basis of race,” as quoted by The Dallas Express News and wbap.com. The guidance explicitly urges schools to stop what it calls “racial balancing” in discipline policies.
What the coverage left out
None of the 12 digests below mention that no left-rated outlet ran this story. None of the centre-rated digests mention the Title VI investigations into Fayetteville and Milwaukee school districts.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 20 Aug 2026, 04:00, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies
American Faith — embedded from source
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Centre
6 rated outlets
- The six centre-rated digests led on the Department’s guidance ending what it termed “racial balancing” in student discipline. Reuters, WTVB, The Mighty 790 KFGO, and Investing.com reported that the guidance urges schools to stop adjusting discipline policies to reduce racial disparities. Education Week and K-12 Dive noted that the guidance follows the rescission of longstanding discrimination rules and was issued in a “Dear Colleague” letter.
- All six digests carried the Department’s directive to apply discipline policies without regard to race. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the Title VI investigations into Fayetteville and Milwaukee school districts.
Right
6 rated outlets
- The six right-rated digests led on the reversal of Obama-era policies and the end of race-conscious discipline. The Dallas Express News, wbap.com, and ussanews.com reported that the guidance ends approaches treating statistical disparities as potential civil rights violations. American Faith and The Daily Signal framed the guidance as scrapping “disparate impact” rules and ending race-based discipline requirements.
- All six right-rated digests mentioned the Title VI investigations into Fayetteville and Milwaukee school districts. The Dallas Express News, wbap.com, and American Faith quoted Secretary McMahon’s statement on X, which criticised the left’s pursuit of “equity.” WKZO’s digest did not mention the investigations or McMahon’s statement.
Read it at the source
12 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Centre
6- US tells schools not to alter discipline policies to reduce racial disparities (opens Investing.com in a new tab)
Investing.com — is Investing.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US tells schools not to alter discipline policies to reduce racial disparities (opens The Mighty 790 KFGO in a new tab)
The Mighty 790 KFGO — is The Mighty 790 KFGO biased? Our profile of this outlet
- US tells schools not to alter discipline policies to reduce racial disparities (opens WTVB in a new tab)
- US tells schools not to alter discipline policies to reduce racial disparities (opens Reuters in a new tab)
- Education Department Tells Schools Race Can’t Factor Into Student Discipline (opens Education Week in a new tab)
Education Week — is Education Week biased? Our profile of this outlet
- OCR calls on schools to ‘stop racial balancing’ in new discipline guidance (opens K-12 Dive in a new tab)
Right
6- US tells schools not to alter discipline policies to reduce racial disparities (opens WKZO in a new tab)
- Feds Launch Civil Rights Probes Into Schools That Punished Kids Differently Based on Race (opens American Faith in a new tab)
American Faith — is American Faith biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Title VI Update: Education Department Ends Race-Conscious Discipline (opens wbap.com in a new tab)
- Title VI Update: Education Department Ends Race-Conscious Discipline (opens The Dallas Express News in a new tab)
The Dallas Express News — is The Dallas Express News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Department of Education to No Longer Require School Discipline Policies That Discriminate on the Basis of Race (opens ussanews.com in a new tab)
ussanews.com — is ussanews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Department of Education's New Race-Neutral Discipline Rules (opens The Daily Signal in a new tab)
The Daily Signal — is The Daily Signal biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies?
- Of the 12 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 50% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 12 rated outlets on this story, 0% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 50% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies biased?
- US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies is one event reported by 12 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered US Education Department bars race from school discipline policies?
- 12 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What does the new US Education Department guidance say?
- The guidance directs schools receiving federal funds to apply student discipline policies without regard to race. It ends prior rules that treated statistical disparities in discipline as potential civil rights violations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The guidance was issued on 19 August 2026.
- Which school districts are under investigation by the Education Department?
- The US Department of Education opened Title VI civil rights investigations into school districts in Fayetteville, Arkansas, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The investigations allege that administrators directed staff to factor race into disciplinary decisions, as reported by American Faith.
- Did any left-rated outlets report on the new guidance?
- No left-rated outlet ran this story, according to the digests available. The 12 digests below are from centre-rated and right-rated outlets only.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

