Skip to the story
All stories

US to skip UN human rights review

The United States will be the first country to refuse a regular review of its human rights record at the UN's top body.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
This photo shows a scene during the 63rd session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Switzerland on Sept. 30, 2026. Lian Yi / Xinhua via Getty Images

What this story says

  • The United States will be the first country to refuse a regular review of its human rights record at the UN's top rights body.
  • The Trump administration withdrew the US from the Human Rights Council last year, citing an anti-US and anti-Israel bias.
  • A State Department spokesperson stated the US gives no credibility to the agency.
  • Critics warn that the US refusal could encourage other countries to follow suit.

Who covered it

Left 28%(16)Centre 55%(32)Right 17%(10)

Percentages are shares of the 58 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 10 of the 68 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

59/100

Hype

45/100

68 sources · methodology

The United States is set to become the first country to fully shun a regular review of its human rights record at the UN's top rights body. The Trump administration pulled the US out of the Human Rights Council last year, accusing it of an anti-US and anti-Israel bias. The US government has not changed its position on attending the review.

A State Department spokesperson stated that the US gives no credibility to the agency. Critics warn that the US walkout could encourage other countries to follow suit. Jamil Dakwar of the ACLU stated the administration is signalling it will continue to violate human rights unabashed.

Disagreement on the council's credibility

CBS News reported that the State Department spokesperson alleged the council has a "persistent failure to condemn the most egregious human rights violators." Reuters reported that rights groups say violations have surged to levels not seen in decades. Aftenposten and vz.ru reported the headline "Hopeless Body" in relation to the UN meeting.

What the coverage left out

None of the left, centre, or right-rated reports printed below mention the specific date the US pulled out of the Human Rights Council last year, only that it occurred in the previous year.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 10 Nov 2026, 12:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

16 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports led on the US becoming the first country to fully shun the UN Human Rights Council review. These reports included statements from Jamil Dakwar of the ACLU, who said the administration is signalling it will "continue to violate human rights unabashed." CBS News, which is rated centre but included in this section due to its full report, also quoted Dakwar and mentioned criticism of US policies including "strong-arm deportations and targeted killings of alleged drug-runners in the Caribbean and Pacific."

Centre

32 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports focused on the US being the first nation to skip the UN Human Rights Council review. These reports noted the Trump administration's previous withdrawal from the council and its accusations of anti-US and anti-Israel bias. A State Department spokesperson's statement that the US gives "no credibility to the agency" was also highlighted.

Right

10 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports highlighted the US refusal to participate in the UN Human Rights Audit. The headline from Aftenposten and The Straits Times, "US to skip UN human rights review, drawing censure," indicated a focus on the negative reception to the US decision. The reports also noted the Trump administration's previous withdrawal from the council.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover US to skip UN human rights review?
Of the 58 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 28% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 17% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 68. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is US to skip UN human rights review left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 58 rated outlets on this story, 28% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 17% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of US to skip UN human rights review biased?
US to skip UN human rights review is one event reported by 68 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered US to skip UN human rights review?
68 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why is the US skipping the UN Human Rights Council review?
The Trump administration previously withdrew the US from the Human Rights Council, accusing it of an anti-US and anti-Israel bias. A State Department spokesperson stated the US gives no credibility to the agency.
What is the significance of the US skipping this review?
The United States is set to become the first country to fully shun a regular review of its human rights record at the UN's top rights body. Critics warn that this action could encourage other countries to follow suit.
What did critics say about the US decision?
Jamil Dakwar of the ACLU stated that the administration is signalling it will continue to violate human rights unabashed. Critics also warn that the US walkout could encourage other countries to follow suit.

Read it at the source

68 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

16
Show 8 more

Centre

32
Show 24 more

Right

10
Show 2 more

Not rated

10
Show 2 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

US skips UN rights review | MediaBias News