Skip to the story
All stories

USPS mail-voting rule blocked by judge amid election concerns

Federal judge issues temporary restraining order against new Postal Service policies that could delay ballots.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated

What this story says

  • A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking new U.S. Postal Service rules on mail-in voting on August 28, 2026.
  • A USPS whistleblower warned that millions of mail ballots could be delayed or blocked by the new policies.
  • Election officials have stated they cannot comply with the rushed requirements before the upcoming midterm elections.
  • The Trump administration is appealing the latest court order that freezes the mail-in voting rule.

Who covered it

Left 34%(23)Centre 50%(33)Right 16%(11)

Percentages are shares of the 67 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 8 of the 75 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

78/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

35/100

75 sources · methodology

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on August 28, 2026, halting new U.S. Postal Service (USPS) policies concerning mail-in voting. This action followed warnings from a USPS whistleblower that millions of mail ballots could face delays or be blocked due to the new regulations. The Trump administration is appealing this order.

The USPS rule, implemented under a March executive order from President Donald Trump, has drawn criticism from election officials who say they cannot meet its requirements before the midterm elections. Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, along with 25 other states, secured a temporary restraining order against the USPS rule. The U.S. Supreme Court had previously lifted a pause on the Trump administration's mail-ballot order on August 24, 2026.

Disagreement on court actions

The Devils Lake Daily Journal reported that a federal judge froze the Trump administration regulation to restrict mail voting for two weeks on August 28, 2026, calling the USPS rule a violation of states’ power to administer elections. In contrast, glasgowcourier.com stated that the U.S. Supreme Court gave way on August 24, 2026, for President Donald Trump to have a hand in regulating mail-in ballots nationwide.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated or centre-rated reports printed below mention the U.S. Supreme Court lifting a pause on Trump’s mail-ballot order on August 24, 2026, as reported by glasgowcourier.com.

Coverage settled. We checked this 9 times and stopped on 8 Sept 2026, 19:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

23 rated outlets

  • Common Dreams led on Senator Bernie Sanders's statement that President Trump's actions regarding mail-in voting constituted an "authoritarian power grab." Sanders claimed Trump sought to rig the election and that mail-in voting is secure, citing his own use of it.
  • Other left-rated outlets focused on the practical implications of the new USPS rule. Election officials warned that compliance would be impossible, leading to "chaos" and potentially disenfranchising voters. Some reports highlighted that the USPS was building a ballot screening system despite ongoing court battles.
  • The Seattle Times, NOTUS, Raw Story, Arizona Mirror, CNN, Joe.My.God., Salon, and Dothan Eagle all reported that election officials stated they could not comply with the new rules. The Watauga Democrat, El Paso Inc., and Daily Post-Athenian noted Colorado would proceed with mailing ballots as usual, despite the order.

Centre

33 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports highlighted the legal actions surrounding the USPS mail-voting rule. The Millbury-Sutton Chronicle and The Grafton News reported that Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell and 25 states secured a temporary restraining order against the USPS rule. bdemo.com noted that the Trump administration is appealing the latest order freezing the mail-in voting rule. The Devils Lake Daily Journal reported on the federal judge's order blocking the rule, while France24 focused on the USPS whistleblower's warning about potential ballot losses.

Right

11 rated outlets

  • The Center Square, the Herald Palladium, the Elkhart Truth, the Daily Courier, Shelby News, Rochester Sentinel, Mountain Democrat, the Courier‑Times and thedailybs.com each led on Colorado’s plan to mail ballots to every registered voter for the November midterm election. All nine digests noted that the effort continues despite ongoing litigation over a federal order and conflicting judicial rulings concerning the U.S. Postal Service.
  • None of the right‑rated digests mention the district judge’s decision to block the mail‑voting rule, any cost estimates, or statements from election officials. The summaries also contain no quoted remarks from parties involved, indicating that those details were omitted from the coverage presented by these outlets.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover USPS mail-voting rule blocked by judge amid election concerns?
Of the 67 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 34% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 16% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 75. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is USPS mail-voting rule blocked by judge amid election concerns left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 67 rated outlets on this story, 34% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 16% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of USPS mail-voting rule blocked by judge amid election concerns biased?
USPS mail-voting rule blocked by judge amid election concerns is one event reported by 75 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered USPS mail-voting rule blocked by judge amid election concerns?
75 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the new USPS rule concerning mail-in voting?
The new U.S. Postal Service rule, stemming from a March executive order by President Donald Trump, places new restrictions on mail-in voting. These include requirements for scanning each ballot envelope individually and collecting voter data through an online portal, which election officials warn are difficult to comply with.
Why has the USPS mail-voting rule been blocked?
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the USPS rule on August 28, 2026. This followed warnings from a USPS whistleblower about potential ballot delays and a legal challenge by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell and 25 other states, who argued the rule violated states' power to administer elections.
What are the concerns about the new USPS mail-voting policies?
Concerns include that the new policies could delay or block millions of mail ballots from reaching voters ahead of the midterm elections. Election officials have also stated they cannot comply with the rushed requirements before the election, warning of potential chaos and disenfranchisement.

Read it at the source

75 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

23
Show 15 more

Centre

33
Show 25 more

Right

11
Show 3 more

Not rated

8

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

How left, centre and right covered the USPS mail-voting rule block | MediaBias News