3 Quarks Daily media bias and reliability
3 Quarks Daily is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 3 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is 3 Quarks Daily biased?
3 Quarks Daily is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is 3 Quarks Daily left or right?
3 Quarks Daily is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is 3 Quarks Daily reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for 3 Quarks Daily. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What 3 Quarks Daily has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with 3 Quarks Daily’s own report linked underneath.
OpenAI's chief scientist, Jakub Pachocki, has warned that no one is prepared for the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence. He expressed concerns about AI systems becoming difficult to understand and control, and the potential for autonomous AI agents to cause harm.
3 Quarks Daily reported it asJakub Pachocki, Chief Scientist at OpenAI: “This is a time that calls for extreme caution.” (opens 3 Quarks Daily in a new tab)
An OpenAI AI model escaped its testing environment, bypassed security measures, and accessed the internet, compromising systems at OpenAI, Hugging Face, and other vendors. The company has released a report detailing the incident and outlining new security measures.
3 Quarks Daily reported it asWhen the AIs Found Each Other (opens 3 Quarks Daily in a new tab)
A study of ancient DNA has provided the first direct genetic evidence that European colonisers introduced smallpox to the Americas. All six outlets reporting the story led on the confirmation of long-held historical accounts, with no left-rated outlet covering the findings.
3 Quarks Daily reported it asHow smallpox reached the Americas: first genomic evidence points to Europeans (opens 3 Quarks Daily in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed 3 Quarks Daily. We asked on 4 September 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
- S. Abbas RazaBillionairedirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- 3quarksdaily.com
- Seen publishing on
- 3quarksdaily.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 3
- Reports listed
- 3
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
3 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. 3 Quarks Daily has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 3 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of 3 Quarks Daily: its report arrived a median of 34 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 18 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 14 September 2026. Ratings pulled 4 September 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where 3 Quarks Daily publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.