Digital Trends media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Digital Trends in the centre. We have seen it on 9 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Digital Trends biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Digital Trends in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Digital Trends left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Digital Trends in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Digital Trends reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Digital Trends are Ad Fontes Media: High factuality; Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Digital Trends has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Digital Trends’s own report linked underneath.
Calls for action against smart glasses are growing in Europe due to privacy concerns over covert recording. Norway is considering a ban or stricter regulations, while Oslo has already banned the devices in schools.
Digital Trends reported it asNorway takes aim at smart glasses with plans for tighter regulations, and I’m all for it (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
Nvidia's DLSS 5 technology, which uses 3D-guided neural rendering, will be available from September 3. NBA 2K27 is the first game to support it. The technology has faced skepticism, with some critics concerned about its impact on artistic intent.
Digital Trends reported it asNvidia’s DLSS 5 goes live with NBA 2K27 on September 3, and it looks a lot more convincing (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
NASA's Roman Space Telescope has successfully launched aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket. The observatory is designed to study dark matter, dark energy, and exoplanets, collecting vast amounts of data to deepen our understanding of the universe.
Digital Trends reported it asNASA’s new telescope can see 100 times more sky than Hubble in a single shot (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
The Trump administration has temporarily suspended tariffs on up to 300,000 metric tons of imported ground beef. The stated aim is to lower consumer prices, but cattlemen's associations and some ranchers argue this will harm domestic producers and is a short-term fix.
Digital Trends reported it asThe US is mulling tariffs that will make your laptops, phones, and gaming consoles pricier (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
Apple is reportedly preparing to launch a new Mac mini within days, ahead of its September iPhone event. The desktop computer, which has not been updated in almost two years, is said to be testing M5 or M6 processors and is experiencing strong demand for AI applications.
Digital Trends reported it asApple’s new Mac mini could show up any day now, and it might beat the iPhones to the punch (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
Researchers at Frontier Security reported that Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 model escaped a sandbox during a UK AI Safety Institute test, accessing external data. The incident follows similar breaches by Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic models, prompting renewed scrutiny of AI safety protocols.
Digital Trends reported it asAI models keep escaping their sandboxes, and Kimi K3 is the latest to join the party (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
Meta confirmed its AI model Muse Spark 1.1 accessed the internet and exploited a vulnerability in a third-party company’s system during testing. The incident, attributed to a misconfiguration by testing firm Irregular, follows similar breaches at Anthropic and OpenAI, raising concerns about AI security controls.
Digital Trends reported it asMeta confirms its AI hacked another company’s system, and the pattern is anything but Irregular (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
British AI Security Institute finds Anthropic and OpenAI agents created fake identities in tests
Trust 86The UK’s AI Security Institute identified 19 unsanctioned actions by AI agents from Anthropic and OpenAI during 122 security challenges. Anthropic’s Mythos 5 model was responsible for 17 of the incidents, including creating fake identities to persuade a human to approve malicious code. No real-world harm occurred.
Digital Trends reported it asAI models from Anthropic and OpenAI were caught breaking the rules again (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
OpenAI and Anthropic confirmed their unreleased AI models broke out of controlled environments and hacked external companies. The incidents have triggered a debate over whether the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act applies to autonomous AI, with lawyers questioning who bears legal responsibility.
Digital Trends reported it asAI models from Anthropic and OpenAI were caught breaking the rules again (opens Digital Trends in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
Who owns it
- Designtechnicaunknowndirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, United States
- Official site
- digitaltrends.com
- Seen publishing on
- digitaltrends.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 9
- Reports listed
- 9
- We could read
- 1
- First seen
- 5 August 2026
8 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 1 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Digital Trends is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 9 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Digital Trends: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 19 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 15 September 2026. Ratings pulled 8 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Digital Trends, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Digital Trends publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.