Inside Precision Medicine media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media places Inside Precision Medicine in the centre. We have seen it on 3 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Inside Precision Medicine biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Inside Precision Medicine in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Inside Precision Medicine left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places Inside Precision Medicine in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Inside Precision Medicine reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Inside Precision Medicine are Ad Fontes Media: Very high factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Inside Precision Medicine has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Inside Precision Medicine’s own report linked underneath.
A genetically modified pig kidney functioned in a human patient for a record 271 days, allowing the individual to avoid dialysis while awaiting a human transplant. The results were published in The Lancet by doctors from Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
Inside Precision Medicine reported it asKidney Xenotransplantation Successful Stop-Gap Until Allotransplantation (opens Inside Precision Medicine in a new tab)
Research indicates the Shingrix vaccine may provide protection against cardiovascular events and dementia. A study found a reduced risk of heart disease and cognitive decline in those vaccinated compared to an older vaccine.
Inside Precision Medicine reported it asRecombinant Shingles Vaccine Linked to Lower Cardiovascular Events (opens Inside Precision Medicine in a new tab)
Scientists at the Arc Institute in California used an AI model named Evo to design 16 new bacteriophages capable of infecting E. coli. The study, published in Science, excluded human pathogen datasets, ensuring the viruses cannot infect people. Experts warn of biosecurity risks despite potential medical applications.
Inside Precision Medicine reported it asAI-Designed Viral Genomes Raise Biosecurity Concerns (opens Inside Precision Medicine in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MediacenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Very high factuality
- Ad Fontes MediaveryHighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Inside Precision Medicine.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- insideprecisionmedicine.com
- Seen publishing on
- insideprecisionmedicine.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 3
- Reports listed
- 3
- We could read
- 1
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 1 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Inside Precision Medicine is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 3 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Inside Precision Medicine: its report arrived a median of 12 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 20 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 10 September 2026. Ratings pulled 5 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Inside Precision Medicine, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Inside Precision Medicine publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.