Is kbsi23.com biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places kbsi23.com as leaning right. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is kbsi23.com biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places kbsi23.com as leaning right. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is kbsi23.com left or right?
Media Bias/Fact Check places kbsi23.com as leaning right. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Right.
Is kbsi23.com reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for kbsi23.com are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What kbsi23.com has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with kbsi23.com’s own report linked underneath.
The US Senate passed a bill on 3 August 2026 that includes a one-month delay on federal regulation of intoxicating hemp-derived THC products in Minnesota. The reprieve, part of a short-term funding measure, could be extended beyond December and prevents an immediate ban on the state's hemp-based edibles and drinks industry.
kbsi23.com reported it asMissouri, Illinois attorneys general oppose changes to federal hemp THC ban - KBSI FOX23 News Cape Girardeau News (opens kbsi23.com in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Media Bias/Fact CheckleanRightCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
High factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for kbsi23.com.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- kbsi23.com
- Seen publishing on
- kbsi23.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
On 1 of those stories, outlets rated right were largely absent from the coverage and kbsi23.com ran the story anyway.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of kbsi23.com: its report arrived a median of 24 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 7 August 2026. Ratings pulled 8 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as kbsi23.com, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where kbsi23.com publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.